Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Acute skin toxicity-related, out-of-pocket expenses in patients with breast cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy

A descriptive, exploratory study

Authors: Julie B. Schnur, Joshua Graff Zivin, David M. K. Mattson Jr., Sheryl Green, Lina H. Jandorf, A. Gabriella Wernicke, Guy H. Montgomery

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Acute skin toxicity is one of the most common side effects of breast cancer radiotherapy. To date, no one has estimated the nonmedical out-of-pocket expenses associated with this side effect. The primary aim of the present descriptive, exploratory study was to assess the feasibility of a newly developed skin toxicity costs questionnaire. The secondary aims were to: (1) estimate nonmedical out-of-pocket costs, (2) examine the nature of the costs, (3) explore potential background predictors of costs, and (4) explore the relationship between patient-reported dermatologic quality of life and expenditures.

Methods

A total of 50 patients (mean age = 54.88, Stage 0–III) undergoing external beam radiotherapy completed a demographics/medical history questionnaire as well as a seven-item Skin Toxicity Costs (STC) questionnaire and the Skindex-16 in week 5 of treatment.

Results

Mean skin toxicity costs were $131.64 (standard error [SE] = $23.68). Most frequently incurred expenditures were new undergarments and products to manage toxicity. Education was a significant unique predictor of spending, with more educated women spending more money. Greater functioning impairment was associated with greater costs. The STC proved to be a practical, brief measure which successfully indicated specific areas of patient expenditures and need.

Conclusions

Results reveal the nonmedical, out-of-pocket costs associated with acute skin toxicity in the context of breast cancer radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify individual costs associated with this treatment side effect, as well as the first to present a scale specifically designed to assess such costs.

Relevance

In future research, the STC could be used as an outcome variable in skin toxicity prevention and control research, as a behavioral indicator of symptom burden, or as part of a needs assessment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Cancer Database [database online] (2006) American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL National Cancer Database [database online] (2006) American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
3.
go back to reference Knobf MT, Sun Y (2005) A longitudinal study of symptoms and self-care activities in women treated with primary radiotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 28(3):210–218PubMedCrossRef Knobf MT, Sun Y (2005) A longitudinal study of symptoms and self-care activities in women treated with primary radiotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 28(3):210–218PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berthelet E, Truong PT, Musso K et al (2004) Preliminary reliability and validity testing of a new Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 27(6):626–631PubMedCrossRef Berthelet E, Truong PT, Musso K et al (2004) Preliminary reliability and validity testing of a new Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 27(6):626–631PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Freedman GM, Li T, Nicolaou N, Chen Y, Ma CC, Anderson PR (2009) Breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces time spent with acute dermatitis for women of all breast sizes during radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(3):689–694. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.071 PubMedCrossRef Freedman GM, Li T, Nicolaou N, Chen Y, Ma CC, Anderson PR (2009) Breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces time spent with acute dermatitis for women of all breast sizes during radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(3):689–694. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2008.​08.​071 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C PubMedCrossRef Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346. doi:10.​1016/​0360-3016(95)00060-C PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Harper JL, Franklin LE, Jenrette JM, Aguero EG (2004) Skin toxicity during breast irradiation: pathophysiology and management. South Med J97(10):989–993CrossRef Harper JL, Franklin LE, Jenrette JM, Aguero EG (2004) Skin toxicity during breast irradiation: pathophysiology and management. South Med J97(10):989–993CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mendelsohn FA, Divino CM, Reis ED, Kerstein MD (2001) Wound care after radiation therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care 15(5):216–224CrossRef Mendelsohn FA, Divino CM, Reis ED, Kerstein MD (2001) Wound care after radiation therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care 15(5):216–224CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schnur JB, Ouellette SC, DiLorenzo TA, Green S, Montgomery GH (2011) A qualitative analysis of acute skin toxicity among breast cancer radiotherapy patients. Psychooncology 20(3):260–268. doi:10.1002/pon.1734 PubMedCrossRef Schnur JB, Ouellette SC, DiLorenzo TA, Green S, Montgomery GH (2011) A qualitative analysis of acute skin toxicity among breast cancer radiotherapy patients. Psychooncology 20(3):260–268. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1734 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wengstrom Y, Haggmark C, Forsberg C (2001) Coping with radiation therapy: strategies used by women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 24(4):264–271PubMedCrossRef Wengstrom Y, Haggmark C, Forsberg C (2001) Coping with radiation therapy: strategies used by women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 24(4):264–271PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schnur JB, Love B, Scheckner BL, Green S, Wernicke AG, Montgomery GH. A systematic review of patient-rated measures of radiodermatitis in breast cancer radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181e84b36 Schnur JB, Love B, Scheckner BL, Green S, Wernicke AG, Montgomery GH. A systematic review of patient-rated measures of radiodermatitis in breast cancer radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.​1097/​COC.​0b013e3181e84b36​
18.
go back to reference Hopwood P, Haviland JS, Sumo G, Mills J, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR (2010) Comparison of patient-reported breast, arm, and shoulder symptoms and body image after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: 5-year follow-up in the randomised Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials. Lancet Oncol 11(3):231–240. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70382-1 PubMedCrossRef Hopwood P, Haviland JS, Sumo G, Mills J, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR (2010) Comparison of patient-reported breast, arm, and shoulder symptoms and body image after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: 5-year follow-up in the randomised Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials. Lancet Oncol 11(3):231–240. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(09)70382-1 PubMedCrossRef
20.
24.
go back to reference Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP (2001) Measurement properties of skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg 5(2):105–110. doi:10.1007/BF02737863 PubMedCrossRef Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP (2001) Measurement properties of skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg 5(2):105–110. doi:10.​1007/​BF02737863 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference SAS (r) (2009) Proprietary Software 9.2 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC SAS (r) (2009) Proprietary Software 9.2 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
27.
go back to reference Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc Ser B26:211–234 Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc Ser B26:211–234
29.
go back to reference Campbell JD, Ramsey SD (2009) The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence. Pharmacoeconomics 27(3):199–209PubMedCrossRef Campbell JD, Ramsey SD (2009) The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence. Pharmacoeconomics 27(3):199–209PubMedCrossRef
30.
32.
Metadata
Title
Acute skin toxicity-related, out-of-pocket expenses in patients with breast cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy
A descriptive, exploratory study
Authors
Julie B. Schnur
Joshua Graff Zivin
David M. K. Mattson Jr.
Sheryl Green
Lina H. Jandorf
A. Gabriella Wernicke
Guy H. Montgomery
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1435-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine