Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: a feasibility study

Authors: Matthew Maddocks, Anthony Byrne, Colin D. Johnson, Richard H. Wilson, Kenneth C. H. Fearon, Andrew Wilcock

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer cachexia impacts on treatment options, quality of life and survival. New treatments are emerging but need to be assessed using outcomes which patients find meaningful. One approach is the measurement of physical activity levels by small lightweight monitors, but experience is limited in cancer patients.

Materials and methods

This study formally assessed the acceptability of wearing an ActivPAL™ monitor for 1 week using compliance based on analysis of movement data. The optimal period of monitoring was explored by comparing mean values of daily step count and energy expenditure (EE) for 2 or 4 and 6 days of monitoring. The relationships between step count, stepping EE and non-stepping EE were also explored.

Results

Sixty patients (mean age 68 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2) with lung or upper gastrointestinal cancer took part. All but one found that the monitor acceptable and mean [95% CI] compliance was 98% [94–100%]. Median daily step counts and EE scores over 2 or 4 days were significantly higher than those from 6 days (p ≤ 0.01). Step count was strongly related to stepping and non-stepping EE (r = −0.911, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The ActivPAL™ is acceptable to patients with outcomes obtained over 6 days recommended for use in future studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bonnefoy M, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Lacour JR, Laville M, Kostka T (2001) Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labelled water study. JAGS 49:28–35CrossRef Bonnefoy M, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Lacour JR, Laville M, Kostka T (2001) Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labelled water study. JAGS 49:28–35CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Dahele M, Skipworth R, Wall L, Voss A, Preston T, Fearon K (2007) Objective physical activity and self-reported quality of life in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 33:676–685CrossRefPubMed Dahele M, Skipworth R, Wall L, Voss A, Preston T, Fearon K (2007) Objective physical activity and self-reported quality of life in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 33:676–685CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fouladiun M, Körner U, Gunnebo L, Sixt-Ammilon P, Bosaeus I, Lundholm K (2007) Daily physical–rest activities in relation to nutritional state, metabolism, and quality of life in cancer patients with progressive cachexia. Clin Cancer Res 13:6379–6385CrossRefPubMed Fouladiun M, Körner U, Gunnebo L, Sixt-Ammilon P, Bosaeus I, Lundholm K (2007) Daily physical–rest activities in relation to nutritional state, metabolism, and quality of life in cancer patients with progressive cachexia. Clin Cancer Res 13:6379–6385CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gordon JN, Green SR, Goggin PM (2005) Cancer cachexia. Q J Med 98:770–788 Gordon JN, Green SR, Goggin PM (2005) Cancer cachexia. Q J Med 98:770–788
7.
go back to reference Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40:992–997CrossRefPubMed Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40:992–997CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Muscaritoli M, Bossola M, Aversa Z, Bellantone R, Fanelli FR (2006) Prevention and treatment of cancer cachexia: new insights into an old problem. Eur J Cancer 42:31–41CrossRefPubMed Muscaritoli M, Bossola M, Aversa Z, Bellantone R, Fanelli FR (2006) Prevention and treatment of cancer cachexia: new insights into an old problem. Eur J Cancer 42:31–41CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Maddocks M, Lewis M, Chauhan A, Manderson C, Hocknell J, Wilcock A (2009) Randomized controlled pilot study of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.001 Maddocks M, Lewis M, Chauhan A, Manderson C, Hocknell J, Wilcock A (2009) Randomized controlled pilot study of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jpainsymman.​2009.​05.​001
11.
go back to reference Netz Y, Wu M-J (2005) Physical activity and psychological well-being in advanced age: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Psychol Aging 20:272–284CrossRefPubMed Netz Y, Wu M-J (2005) Physical activity and psychological well-being in advanced age: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Psychol Aging 20:272–284CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Paul DR, Kramer M, Stote KS, Spears KE, Moshfegh AJ, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV (2008) Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8:38CrossRefPubMed Paul DR, Kramer M, Stote KS, Spears KE, Moshfegh AJ, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV (2008) Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8:38CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel M, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M (2008) A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nut Phys Act 5:56CrossRef Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel M, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M (2008) A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nut Phys Act 5:56CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rejeski JW, Mihalko SL (2001) Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:23–35PubMed Rejeski JW, Mihalko SL (2001) Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:23–35PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH (2006) The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med 40:779–784CrossRefPubMed Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH (2006) The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med 40:779–784CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Steer TE (2005) Report of a Joint Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council workshop on cancer cachexia research at the Royal College of Physicians, Tuesday, 2nd December 2003. Br J Cancer 92:1830–1833CrossRefPubMed Steer TE (2005) Report of a Joint Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council workshop on cancer cachexia research at the Royal College of Physicians, Tuesday, 2nd December 2003. Br J Cancer 92:1830–1833CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RP (2005) Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:s531–s543CrossRefPubMed Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RP (2005) Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:s531–s543CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tudor-Locke C, Washington TL, Hart TL (2009) Expected values for steps/day in special populations. Preventative Medicine 49:3–11CrossRef Tudor-Locke C, Washington TL, Hart TL (2009) Expected values for steps/day in special populations. Preventative Medicine 49:3–11CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Tropano RP (2005) Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sport Exerc 37:582–588CrossRef Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Tropano RP (2005) Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sport Exerc 37:582–588CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22:209–212CrossRef Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22:209–212CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: a feasibility study
Authors
Matthew Maddocks
Anthony Byrne
Colin D. Johnson
Richard H. Wilson
Kenneth C. H. Fearon
Andrew Wilcock
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0776-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine