Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2005

01-02-2005 | Review Article

Emesis induced by low or minimal emetic risk chemotherapy

Authors: Maurizio Tonato, Rebecca A. Clark-Snow, David Osoba, Albano Del Favero, Enzo Ballatori, Sussanne Borjeson

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

For patients treated with low or minimally emetogenic chemotherapy there is little evidence from clinical trials supporting the choice of a given antiemetic therapy or of any treatment at all. The panel recognized the necessity of considering the introduction into clinical practice of new agents in these categories, particularly oral cytotoxic agents and targeted biological agents and also the possibility of over-treatment with antiemetics. There was consensus among panel members regarding the recommended treatment for patients receiving chemotherapy agents with low and minimal emetic risk. Patients without a history of nausea and vomiting for whom minimally emetic risk chemotherapy is prescribed should not routinely receive antiemetic prophylaxis. A single agent such as a low-dose corticosteroid is suggested for patients receiving agents of low emetic risk. If nausea and vomiting occurs during subsequent cycles of chemotherapy, prophylaxis with a single agent such as a substituted benzamide, a corticosteroid, or a phenothiazine should be administered. Only patients with persistent nausea and vomiting despite treatment with these recommended agents should receive a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist in the following cycles.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (1998) Prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the Perugia Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 9:811–819CrossRefPubMed Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (1998) Prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the Perugia Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 9:811–819CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference DeAngelis V, Roila F, Sabbatini R, et al (2003) Cancer chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis: antiemetic prescriptions in clinical practice. ASCO abstract 2971 DeAngelis V, Roila F, Sabbatini R, et al (2003) Cancer chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis: antiemetic prescriptions in clinical practice. ASCO abstract 2971
3.
go back to reference Gralla R, Osoba D, Kris M, et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed Gralla R, Osoba D, Kris M, et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed
4.
go back to reference Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Transferability to clinical practice of the clinical results of controlled clinical trials: the case of antiemetic prophylactic treatment for cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ann Oncol 9:759–765CrossRefPubMed Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Transferability to clinical practice of the clinical results of controlled clinical trials: the case of antiemetic prophylactic treatment for cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ann Oncol 9:759–765CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (2001) Is an antiemetic prophylactic treatment needed for patients submitted to consecutive days of 5-fluorouracil? An observational study. Tumori 87:379–382PubMed Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (2001) Is an antiemetic prophylactic treatment needed for patients submitted to consecutive days of 5-fluorouracil? An observational study. Tumori 87:379–382PubMed
6.
go back to reference Roila F (2004) Transferring scientific evidence to oncological practice: a trial on the impact of three different implementation strategies on antiemetic prescriptions. Support Care Cancer 12:446–453CrossRefPubMed Roila F (2004) Transferring scientific evidence to oncological practice: a trial on the impact of three different implementation strategies on antiemetic prescriptions. Support Care Cancer 12:446–453CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Emesis induced by low or minimal emetic risk chemotherapy
Authors
Maurizio Tonato
Rebecca A. Clark-Snow
David Osoba
Albano Del Favero
Enzo Ballatori
Sussanne Borjeson
Publication date
01-02-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0703-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2005 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine