Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2004

01-12-2004 | Original Article

Bisphosphonate use for the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases: A survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists

Authors: Sunil Verma, Danielle Kerr-Cresswell, George Dranitsaris, Flay Charbonneau, Maureen Trudeau, Geetha Yogendran, Anne-Marie Cesta, Mark Clemons

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of bisphosphonates (BP) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases (BM) has been shown to reduce bone pain and lower the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). Many practice guidelines exist for the use of BPs in patients with BM. Unfortunately, none clearly address whether the benefits of BP use apply equally to all subgroups of patients, the duration of therapy, and when to discontinue BP therapy. A questionnaire was therefore developed and administered to determine how medical oncologists in Canada use BPs in clinical practice.

Methods

A structured mailing strategy was adopted. The population consisted of 100 medical oncologists with active breast cancer practices in Canada. All regions of Canada were represented. The questionnaire was developed to capture data on respondent demographics, BPs used, major factors influencing decision making, and clinical practice in situations where there is a lack of high-quality data.

Results

Completed questionnaires were returned by 76 medical oncologists. All treated breast cancer and the majority (68%) were based at teaching hospitals. Ninety-six percent of respondents regularly prescribed BPs, initiating therapy at the time the patient presented with BM. Although 79% of respondents recognized that there was no clear data to support the continued use of BP after bony progression, 53% stated that they rarely or never discontinue a BP once started. In situations where a BP was discontinued, the majority of respondents report the reason for discontinuation was a decrease in patient performance status. In the patient with clearly progressive visceral metastases and an estimated prognosis of less than 6 months, 75% of respondents would still commence BP therapy.

Conclusions

This study confirms that most medical oncologists in Canada, while acknowledging lack of evidence, maintain patients on BP therapy when patients have an expected survival of less than 6 months or even after patients progress while on a BP. More research is needed to determine the role of continuing, switching, or discontinuing BP therapy in the context of disease progression or shortened expected survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bloomfield D, Warr D, Whelan T, Pritchard K, Levine M (1999) Use of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Current Oncology 6:144–154 Bloomfield D, Warr D, Whelan T, Pritchard K, Levine M (1999) Use of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Current Oncology 6:144–154
2.
go back to reference Body JJ, Mancini I (2002) Bisphosphonates for cancer patients: why, how, and when? Support Care Cancer 10(5):399–407CrossRefPubMed Body JJ, Mancini I (2002) Bisphosphonates for cancer patients: why, how, and when? Support Care Cancer 10(5):399–407CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Breast Cancer Disease Site Group. Use of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. CCO Practice Guideline Initiative. Available from: URL: www.hiru.mcmaster.ca/ccopgi/guidelines/bre/cpg1_11.html Breast Cancer Disease Site Group. Use of bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. CCO Practice Guideline Initiative. Available from: URL: www.hiru.mcmaster.ca/ccopgi/guidelines/bre/cpg1_11.html
4.
go back to reference Cancer Care Ontario (2000) New drug funding program. Available from: URL: www.cancercare.on.ca/treatment/newdrugs.html. Cancer Care Ontario (2000) New drug funding program. Available from: URL: www.cancercare.on.ca/treatment/newdrugs.html.
5.
go back to reference Coleman R (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80:1588–1594PubMed Coleman R (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80:1588–1594PubMed
6.
go back to reference Coleman R, Rubens R (1987) The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55:61–66PubMed Coleman R, Rubens R (1987) The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55:61–66PubMed
7.
go back to reference Coleman R, Smith P, Rubens R (1998) Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:336–340PubMed Coleman R, Smith P, Rubens R (1998) Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:336–340PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hill M, Richards M, Gregory W, Smith P, Rubens R (1993) Spinal cord compression in breast cancer: a review of 70 cases. Br J Cancer 68:969–973PubMed Hill M, Richards M, Gregory W, Smith P, Rubens R (1993) Spinal cord compression in breast cancer: a review of 70 cases. Br J Cancer 68:969–973PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chelebowski RT et al (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 Update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(21):4042–4057CrossRefPubMed Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chelebowski RT et al (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 Update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(21):4042–4057CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Lipton A et al (1998) Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. J Clin Oncol 16:2038–2044PubMed Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Lipton A et al (1998) Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. J Clin Oncol 16:2038–2044PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Porter L et al (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. NEJM 335:1785–1791CrossRefPubMed Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Porter L et al (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. NEJM 335:1785–1791CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090CrossRefPubMed Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Major P, Cook R, Tozer R, Hirte H (1998) Bisphosphonates for bone metastases in breast cancer patients: trial design issues and evaluation of published studies. Current Oncology 5:181–187 Major P, Cook R, Tozer R, Hirte H (1998) Bisphosphonates for bone metastases in breast cancer patients: trial design issues and evaluation of published studies. Current Oncology 5:181–187
14.
go back to reference Mundy G (1997) Mechanisms of bone metastasis. Cancer 80:1546–1556PubMed Mundy G (1997) Mechanisms of bone metastasis. Cancer 80:1546–1556PubMed
16.
go back to reference Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN et al (1999) for the Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 17(3):846–854PubMed Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN et al (1999) for the Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 17(3):846–854PubMed
Metadata
Title
Bisphosphonate use for the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases: A survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists
Authors
Sunil Verma
Danielle Kerr-Cresswell
George Dranitsaris
Flay Charbonneau
Maureen Trudeau
Geetha Yogendran
Anne-Marie Cesta
Mark Clemons
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2004
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0671-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2004

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2004 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine