Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Endoscopy | Guidelines

SAGES and EAES recommendations for minimally invasive surgery during COVID-19 pandemic

Authors: Nader Francis, Jonathan Dort, Eugene Cho, Liane Feldman, Deborah Keller, Rob Lim, Dean Mikami, Edward Phillips, Konstantinos Spaniolas, Shawn Tsuda, Kevin Wasco, Tan Arulampalam, Markar Sheraz, Salvador Morales, Andrea Pietrabissa, Horacio Asbun, Aurora Pryor

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The unprecedented pandemic of COVID-19 has impacted many lives and affects the whole healthcare systems globally. In addition to the considerable workload challenges, surgeons are faced with a number of uncertainties regarding their own safety, practice, and overall patient care. This guide has been drafted at short notice to advise on specific issues related to surgical service provision and the safety of minimally invasive surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although laparoscopy can theoretically lead to aerosolization of blood borne viruses, there is no evidence available to confirm this is the case with COVID-19. The ultimate decision on the approach should be made after considering the proven benefits of laparoscopic techniques versus the potential theoretical risks of aerosolization. Nevertheless, erring on the side of safety would warrant treating the coronavirus as exhibiting similar aerosolization properties and all members of the OR staff should use personal protective equipment (PPE) in all surgical procedures during the pandemic regardless of known or suspected COVID status. Pneumoperitoneum should be safely evacuated via a filtration system before closure, trocar removal, specimen extraction, or conversion to open. All emergent endoscopic procedures performed during the pandemic should be considered as high risk and PPE must be used by all endoscopy staff.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A (2006) Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect 62(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A (2006) Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect 62(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eubanks S, Newman L, Lucas G (1993) Reduction of HIV transmission during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc 3(1):2–5 Eubanks S, Newman L, Lucas G (1993) Reduction of HIV transmission during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc 3(1):2–5
3.
go back to reference Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS et al (2016) Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med 73:857–863PubMed Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS et al (2016) Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med 73:857–863PubMed
4.
go back to reference COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim TH (2014) Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28(8):2374–2380CrossRefPubMed Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim TH (2014) Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28(8):2374–2380CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gloster HM Jr, Roenigk RK (1995) Risk of acquiring human papilloma-virus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 32:436–441CrossRefPubMed Gloster HM Jr, Roenigk RK (1995) Risk of acquiring human papilloma-virus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 32:436–441CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Garden JM, O‘Banion MK, Shelnitz LS et al (1988) Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae. JAMA 259:1199–1202CrossRefPubMed Garden JM, O‘Banion MK, Shelnitz LS et al (1988) Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae. JAMA 259:1199–1202CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM (1990) Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser-generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon. Obstet Gynecol 75:114–118PubMed Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM (1990) Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser-generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon. Obstet Gynecol 75:114–118PubMed
20.
go back to reference Baggish MS, Poiesz BJ, Joret D, Williamson P, Refai A (1991) Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med 11:197–203CrossRefPubMed Baggish MS, Poiesz BJ, Joret D, Williamson P, Refai A (1991) Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med 11:197–203CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference In SM, Park DY, Sohn IK et al (2015) Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments. Br J Surg 102:1581–1586CrossRefPubMed In SM, Park DY, Sohn IK et al (2015) Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments. Br J Surg 102:1581–1586CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wisniewski PM, Warhol MJ, Rando RF, Sedlacek TV, Kemp JE, Fisher JC (1990) Studies on the transmission of viral disease via the CO2 laser plume and ejecta. J Reprod Med 35:1117–1123PubMed Wisniewski PM, Warhol MJ, Rando RF, Sedlacek TV, Kemp JE, Fisher JC (1990) Studies on the transmission of viral disease via the CO2 laser plume and ejecta. J Reprod Med 35:1117–1123PubMed
23.
go back to reference Royal Surgical Colleges, Association of Surgeon of Great Britain & Ireland, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland, & Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons. (2020) Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19 Royal Surgical Colleges, Association of Surgeon of Great Britain & Ireland, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland, & Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons. (2020) Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19
24.
go back to reference Okoshi K, Kobayashi K, Kinoshita K, Tomizawa Y, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2015) Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel. Surg Today 45(8):957–965CrossRefPubMed Okoshi K, Kobayashi K, Kinoshita K, Tomizawa Y, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2015) Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel. Surg Today 45(8):957–965CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Chiu PWY, Ng SC, Inoue H, Reddy DN, Ling HuE, Cho JY, Ho LK, Hewett DG, Chiu HM, Rerknimitr R, Wang HP, Ho SH, Seo DW, Goh KL, Tajiri H, Kitano S, Chan FKL (2020) Practice of endoscopy during COVID-19 pandemic: position statements of the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE-COVID statements). Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321185 CrossRefPubMed Chiu PWY, Ng SC, Inoue H, Reddy DN, Ling HuE, Cho JY, Ho LK, Hewett DG, Chiu HM, Rerknimitr R, Wang HP, Ho SH, Seo DW, Goh KL, Tajiri H, Kitano S, Chan FKL (2020) Practice of endoscopy during COVID-19 pandemic: position statements of the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE-COVID statements). Gut. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​gutjnl-2020-321185 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
SAGES and EAES recommendations for minimally invasive surgery during COVID-19 pandemic
Authors
Nader Francis
Jonathan Dort
Eugene Cho
Liane Feldman
Deborah Keller
Rob Lim
Dean Mikami
Edward Phillips
Konstantinos Spaniolas
Shawn Tsuda
Kevin Wasco
Tan Arulampalam
Markar Sheraz
Salvador Morales
Andrea Pietrabissa
Horacio Asbun
Aurora Pryor
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07565-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020 Go to the issue