Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Laparoscopy

Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Authors: Basem G. Soliman, Duc T. Nguyen, Edward Y. Chan, Ray K. Chihara, Leonora M. Meisenbach, Edward A. Graviss, Min P. Kim

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We postulated that the use of robotics may improve outcomes in hiatal hernia repair.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected Society of Thoracic Surgery database at a single institution of patients who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair from 2012 to 2017 using either laparoscopy or the da Vinci Xi robot. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes and then performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling to determine the factors associated with postoperative morbidity.

Results

There were 293 consecutive patients who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair using either a laparoscopic (n = 151) or a robotic (n = 142) technique. There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, smoking history, presence of comorbidity, or hiatal hernia type. Seventy percent of the cases were a repair of either type III or type IV hiatal hernia. There were significantly higher ASA III and IV (7.9% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.03), higher Toupet fundoplication (83.4% vs. 44.4%, P < 0.001), and lower redo-repair (7.3% vs. 20.4%, P = 0.001) in the laparoscopic group compared to the robotic group. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter (1.3 ± 1.8 vs. 1.8 ± 1.5 days, P = 0.003) and there were significantly lower rates of complications (6.3 vs. 19.2%, P = 0.001) after robotic compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. There was no difference in readmission rate and mortality. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that older age and laparoscopic technique were associated with higher complications after surgery.

Conclusion

The use of the Da Vinci Xi robot in our institution was associated with improved outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair despite a higher incidence of re-operative cases in the robotic group. Thus, short-term outcomes of Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair are not inferior to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Further studies are needed to determine if Da Vinci Xi robot provides superior short-term and long-term outcome in treatment of symptomatic hiatal hernia.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Tian W, Fei Y (2018) Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery to hernia repair. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg 21:740–743 Tian W, Fei Y (2018) Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery to hernia repair. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg 21:740–743
22.
go back to reference Morelli L, Di Franco G, Lorenzoni V, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, Mosca F, Turchetti G, Cuschieri A (2018) Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6465-9 CrossRefPubMed Morelli L, Di Franco G, Lorenzoni V, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, Mosca F, Turchetti G, Cuschieri A (2018) Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-6465-9 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair
Authors
Basem G. Soliman
Duc T. Nguyen
Edward Y. Chan
Ray K. Chihara
Leonora M. Meisenbach
Edward A. Graviss
Min P. Kim
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07055-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020 Go to the issue