Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Inguinal Hernia | 2018 SAGES Oral

An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Authors: Merritt Denham, Brandon Johnson, Michelle Leong, Kristine Kuchta, Eliza Conaty, Michael B. Ujiki, Woody Denham, Stephen P. Haggerty, Zeeshan Butt, JoAnn Carbray, Matt Gitelis, John G. Linn

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It remains unclear whether use of self-fixating mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) impacts postoperative quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize patients receiving self-fixating mesh during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR will report less pain and improved QoL compared to those receiving non-fixating mesh.

Methods

An IRB-approved, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with primary, unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to receive either non-fixating (control) or self-fixating mesh. Clinical visits were conducted 3 weeks and 1 year after LIHR. A validated Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) instrument was used to assess patients’ QoL preoperatively and postoperatively along with Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Comparisons between self-fixating and non-fixating mesh groups were made using Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum or independent samples t tests.

Results

Two hundred and seventy patients were enrolled (137 non-fixating vs 133 self-fixating). Preoperatively, there was no difference in mean age, BMI, or median hernia duration between groups (57.9 vs 56.6 years, p = 0.550; 26.1 vs 26.8, p = 0.534; 3.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.846). Median operative times (34 vs 34 min, p = 0.545) and LOS were similar. More patients in the non-fixating group received tacks (43 vs 19, p = 0.001). Patients receiving non-fixating mesh recorded better mean SOMS scores for the first 3 days following surgery (Day 1: p = 0.005; Day 2: p = 0.002; Day 3: p = 0.024, Table 1) indicating less pain. No differences in pain were seen 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. There were zero recurrences found during clinical follow-up in either of the groups.

Conclusions

Patients receiving self-fixating mesh report worse postoperative pain in the first 2–3 days than those receiving non-fixating mesh. The groups showed no differences across QoL metrics (SOMS and CCS) at 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. Self-fixating mesh does not appear to positively impact QoL after TEP LIHR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersson B, Halle´n M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133:464–472CrossRefPubMed Andersson B, Halle´n M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133:464–472CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Schmedt CG, Daubler P, Leibl BJ et al (2002) Simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of 1336 consecutive cases at a single center. Surg Endosc 16:240–244CrossRefPubMed Schmedt CG, Daubler P, Leibl BJ et al (2002) Simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of 1336 consecutive cases at a single center. Surg Endosc 16:240–244CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M et al (2015) Single-center, singleblinded, randomized study of self-gripping versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 194:77–82CrossRefPubMed Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M et al (2015) Single-center, singleblinded, randomized study of self-gripping versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 194:77–82CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Suumann J, Kirsimägi U, Seepter H, Tein A, Lepner U (2017) Three-year results of a randomized study comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 209:139–144CrossRefPubMed Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Suumann J, Kirsimägi U, Seepter H, Tein A, Lepner U (2017) Three-year results of a randomized study comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 209:139–144CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S et al (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex ProGrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16:287–294CrossRefPubMed Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S et al (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex ProGrip polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16:287–294CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ronka K, Vironen J, Kossi J et al (2015) Randomized multicenter trial comparing glue fixation, self-gripping mesh, and suture fixation of mesh in Lichtenstein hernia repair (FinnMesh study). Ann Surg 262:714–719 (discussion 719–720)CrossRefPubMed Ronka K, Vironen J, Kossi J et al (2015) Randomized multicenter trial comparing glue fixation, self-gripping mesh, and suture fixation of mesh in Lichtenstein hernia repair (FinnMesh study). Ann Surg 262:714–719 (discussion 719–720)CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Verhagen T, Zwaans WA, Loos MJ, Charbon JA, Scheltinga MR, Roumen RM (2016) Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with a standard polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 103:812–818CrossRefPubMed Verhagen T, Zwaans WA, Loos MJ, Charbon JA, Scheltinga MR, Roumen RM (2016) Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with a standard polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 103:812–818CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:474–481CrossRefPubMed Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:474–481CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ozmen J, Choi V, Hepburn K, Hawkins W, Loi K (2015) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair using a self-gripping mesh: clinical results of 235 primary and recurrent groin hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(11):915–919CrossRefPubMed Ozmen J, Choi V, Hepburn K, Hawkins W, Loi K (2015) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair using a self-gripping mesh: clinical results of 235 primary and recurrent groin hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(11):915–919CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, Reiner M, Jacob B (2015) The use of self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study. Surg Endosc 29(9):2690–2696CrossRefPubMed Bresnahan E, Bates A, Wu A, Reiner M, Jacob B (2015) The use of self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study. Surg Endosc 29(9):2690–2696CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45:S3–S11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45:S3–S11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J et al (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708CrossRefPubMed Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J et al (2012) Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 215:702–708CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR (2006) Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. JSLS 10:457–460PubMedPubMedCentral Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR (2006) Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. JSLS 10:457–460PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Quyn AJ, Weatherhead KM, Daniel T (2012) Chronic pain after open inguinla hernia surgery: suture fixation versus self-adhesive mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:1215CrossRefPubMed Quyn AJ, Weatherhead KM, Daniel T (2012) Chronic pain after open inguinla hernia surgery: suture fixation versus self-adhesive mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:1215CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199CrossRefPubMed Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76CrossRefPubMed Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D (2014) Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 207:773CrossRefPubMed Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D (2014) Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 207:773CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Junsheng L, Zhenling J, Yinxiang L (2014) The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. The results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg 259:1080CrossRef Junsheng L, Zhenling J, Yinxiang L (2014) The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. The results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg 259:1080CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Authors
Merritt Denham
Brandon Johnson
Michelle Leong
Kristine Kuchta
Eliza Conaty
Michael B. Ujiki
Woody Denham
Stephen P. Haggerty
Zeeshan Butt
JoAnn Carbray
Matt Gitelis
John G. Linn
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Inguinal Hernia
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6555-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019 Go to the issue