Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019

01-07-2019

The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training

Authors: Mona W. Schmidt, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Marc L. Schmidt, Erica Wennberg, Carly R. Garrow, Sang Paik, Laura Benner, Marlies P. Schijven, Beat P. Müller-Stich, Felix Nickel

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Virtual reality (VR-)trainers are well integrated in laparoscopic surgical training. However, objective feedback is often provided in the form of single parameters, e.g., time or number of movements, making comparisons and evaluation of trainees’ overall performance difficult. Therefore, a new standard for reporting outcome data is highly needed. The aim of this study was to create a weighted, expert-based composite score, to offer simple and direct evaluation of laparoscopic performance on common VR-trainers.

Materials and methods

An integrated analytic hierarchy process-Delphi survey was conducted with 14 international experts to achieve a consensus on the importance of different skill categories and parameters in evaluation of laparoscopic performance. A scoring algorithm was established to allow comparability between tasks and VR-trainers. A weighted composite score was calculated for basic skills tasks and peg transfer on the LapMentor™ II and III and validated for both VR-trainers.

Results

Five major skill categories (time, efficiency, safety, dexterity, and outcome) were identified and weighted in two Delphi rounds. Safety, with a weight of 67%, was determined the most important category, followed by efficiency with 17%. The LapMentor™-specific score was validated using 15 (14) novices and 9 experts; the score was able to differentiate between both groups for basic skills tasks and peg transfer (LapMentor™ II: Exp: 86.5 ± 12.7, Nov. 52.8 ± 18.3; p < 0.001; LapMentor™ III: Exp: 80.8 ± 7.1, Nov: 50.6 ± 16.9; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

An effective and simple performance measurement was established to propose a new standard in analyzing and reporting VR outcome data—the Heidelberg virtual reality (VR) score. The scoring algorithm and the consensus results on the importance of different skill aspects in laparoscopic surgery are universally applicable and can be transferred to any simulator or task. By incorporating specific expert baseline data for the respective task, comparability between tasks, studies, and simulators can be achieved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yiannakopoulou E, Nikiteas N, Perrea D, Tsigris C (2015) Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 13:60–64CrossRef Yiannakopoulou E, Nikiteas N, Perrea D, Tsigris C (2015) Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 13:60–64CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nickel F, Brzoska JA, Gondan M, Rangnick HM, Chu J, Kenngott HG, Linke GR, Kadmon M, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP (2015) Virtual reality training versus blended learning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial with laparoscopic novices. Medicine 94:e764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nickel F, Brzoska JA, Gondan M, Rangnick HM, Chu J, Kenngott HG, Linke GR, Kadmon M, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP (2015) Virtual reality training versus blended learning of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial with laparoscopic novices. Medicine 94:e764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T (2016) Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Int J Surg 29:85–94CrossRefPubMed Alaker M, Wynn GR, Arulampalam T (2016) Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Int J Surg 29:85–94CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kowalewski KF, Garrow CR, Proctor T, Preukschas AA, Friedrich M, Muller PC, Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2018) LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 32:3830–3838CrossRefPubMed Kowalewski KF, Garrow CR, Proctor T, Preukschas AA, Friedrich M, Muller PC, Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2018) LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 32:3830–3838CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Beyer-Berjot L, Berdah S, Hashimoto DA, Darzi A, Aggarwal R (2016) A virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Surg Educ 73:932–941CrossRefPubMed Beyer-Berjot L, Berdah S, Hashimoto DA, Darzi A, Aggarwal R (2016) A virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Surg Educ 73:932–941CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Thijssen AS, Schijven MP (2010) Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees? Am J Surg 199:529–541CrossRefPubMed Thijssen AS, Schijven MP (2010) Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees? Am J Surg 199:529–541CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yamaguchi S, Konishi K, Yasunaga T, Yoshida D, Kinjo N, Kobayashi K, Ieiri S, Okazaki K, Nakashima H, Tanoue K, Maehara Y, Hashizume M (2007) Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 21:2253–2257CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi S, Konishi K, Yasunaga T, Yoshida D, Kinjo N, Kobayashi K, Ieiri S, Okazaki K, Nakashima H, Tanoue K, Maehara Y, Hashizume M (2007) Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 21:2253–2257CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2009) Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 96:1086–1093CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2009) Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 96:1086–1093CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wilson M, McGrath J, Vine S, Brewer J, Defriend D, Masters R (2010) Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts. Surg Endosc 24:2458–2464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilson M, McGrath J, Vine S, Brewer J, Defriend D, Masters R (2010) Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts. Surg Endosc 24:2458–2464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Technol Int 11:32–36PubMed Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Technol Int 11:32–36PubMed
12.
go back to reference Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, Tully A, Sorensen JL, Dalsgaard T, Ottesen B (2006) Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. 20:1460–1466 Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, Tully A, Sorensen JL, Dalsgaard T, Ottesen B (2006) Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. 20:1460–1466
13.
go back to reference Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Lederman A, Baghai M, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES minimally invasive surgical trainer-virtual reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc 21:5–10CrossRefPubMed Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Lederman A, Baghai M, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2007) Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES minimally invasive surgical trainer-virtual reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc 21:5–10CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Avgerinos DV, Goodell KH, Waxberg S, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2005) Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user’s level of experience. Surg Endosc 19:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed Avgerinos DV, Goodell KH, Waxberg S, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2005) Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user’s level of experience. Surg Endosc 19:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21:1413–1417CrossRefPubMed van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21:1413–1417CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2008) LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity. Simul Healthc 3:16–25CrossRefPubMed Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2008) LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity. Simul Healthc 3:16–25CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhang A, Hunerbein M, Dai Y, Schlag PM, Beller S (2008) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator. Surg Endosc 22:1440–1444CrossRefPubMed Zhang A, Hunerbein M, Dai Y, Schlag PM, Beller S (2008) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator. Surg Endosc 22:1440–1444CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Corica FA, Boker JR, Sala LG, Stoliar G, Borin JF, Chu FT, Clayman RV (2006) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 202:779–787CrossRefPubMed McDougall EM, Corica FA, Boker JR, Sala LG, Stoliar G, Borin JF, Chu FT, Clayman RV (2006) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 202:779–787CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rosenthal R, von Websky MW, Hoffmann H, Vitz M, Hahnloser D, Bucher HC, Schäfer J (2015) How to report multiple outcome metrics in virtual reality simulation. Eur Surg 47:202–205CrossRef Rosenthal R, von Websky MW, Hoffmann H, Vitz M, Hahnloser D, Bucher HC, Schäfer J (2015) How to report multiple outcome metrics in virtual reality simulation. Eur Surg 47:202–205CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25:1192–1198CrossRefPubMed Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25:1192–1198CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, the SFLSC (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135:21–27CrossRefPubMed Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, the SFLSC (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135:21–27CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Saaty TL (1980) The analytic heirarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York Saaty TL (1980) The analytic heirarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
23.
go back to reference Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong W, Xu Y (2010) Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decis Support Syst 49:281–289CrossRef Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong W, Xu Y (2010) Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decis Support Syst 49:281–289CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cotin S, Stylopoulos N, Ottensmeyer M, Neumann P, Rattner D, Dawson S (2002) Metrics for laparoscopic skills trainers: the weakest link! In: Dohi T, Kikinis R (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervenetion—MICCAI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 35–43 Cotin S, Stylopoulos N, Ottensmeyer M, Neumann P, Rattner D, Dawson S (2002) Metrics for laparoscopic skills trainers: the weakest link! In: Dohi T, Kikinis R (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervenetion—MICCAI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 35–43
27.
go back to reference Crawford G, Williams C (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J Math Psychol 29:387–405CrossRef Crawford G, Williams C (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J Math Psychol 29:387–405CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Aguaron J, Moreno-Jiménez JMa (2003) The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 147:137–145CrossRef Aguaron J, Moreno-Jiménez JMa (2003) The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 147:137–145CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dalkey NC (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF Dalkey NC (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF
30.
go back to reference Landeta J (2006) Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:467–482CrossRef Landeta J (2006) Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:467–482CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Awad M, Awad F, Carter F, Jervis B, Buzink S, Foster J, Jakimowicz J, Francis NK (2018) Consensus views on the optimum training curriculum for advanced minimally invasive surgery: a delphi study. Int J Surg 53:137–142CrossRefPubMed Awad M, Awad F, Carter F, Jervis B, Buzink S, Foster J, Jakimowicz J, Francis NK (2018) Consensus views on the optimum training curriculum for advanced minimally invasive surgery: a delphi study. Int J Surg 53:137–142CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna GB (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? 1. Am J Surg 182:110–116CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna GB (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? 1. Am J Surg 182:110–116CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Blumenthal AL (1977) The process of cognition. Experimental psychology series. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, New Jersey Blumenthal AL (1977) The process of cognition. Experimental psychology series. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, New Jersey
34.
go back to reference Palter VN, Graafland M, Schijven MP, Grantcharov TP (2012) Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. Surgery 151:391–397CrossRef Palter VN, Graafland M, Schijven MP, Grantcharov TP (2012) Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. Surgery 151:391–397CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J (2007) The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ 6:1–21 Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J (2007) The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ 6:1–21
36.
go back to reference Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F (2010) The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Wiley, Chichester Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F (2010) The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Wiley, Chichester
37.
go back to reference Trevelyan EG, Robinson PN (2015) Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med 7:423–428CrossRef Trevelyan EG, Robinson PN (2015) Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med 7:423–428CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Chowriappa AJ, Shi Y, Raza SJ, Ahmed K, Stegemann A, Wilding G, Kaouk J, Peabody JO, Menon M, Hassett JM, Kesavadas T, Guru KA (2013) Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training—the Robotic skills assessment score. J Surg Res 185:561–569CrossRefPubMed Chowriappa AJ, Shi Y, Raza SJ, Ahmed K, Stegemann A, Wilding G, Kaouk J, Peabody JO, Menon M, Hassett JM, Kesavadas T, Guru KA (2013) Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training—the Robotic skills assessment score. J Surg Res 185:561–569CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Stylopoulos N, Cotin S, Maithel SK, Ottensmeyer M, Jackson PG, Bardsley RS, Neumann PF, Rattner DW, Dawson SL (2004) Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap. Surg Endosc 18:782–789CrossRefPubMed Stylopoulos N, Cotin S, Maithel SK, Ottensmeyer M, Jackson PG, Bardsley RS, Neumann PF, Rattner DW, Dawson SL (2004) Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap. Surg Endosc 18:782–789CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Agrusa A, Di Buono G, Buscemi S, Cucinella G, Romano G, Gulotta G (2018) 3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospetive clinical trial. Oncotarget 9:17325CrossRef Agrusa A, Di Buono G, Buscemi S, Cucinella G, Romano G, Gulotta G (2018) 3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospetive clinical trial. Oncotarget 9:17325CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Milkovich G, Annoni AJ, Mahoney T (1972) The use of the Delphi procedures in manpower forecasting. Manag Sci 19:381–388CrossRef Milkovich G, Annoni AJ, Mahoney T (1972) The use of the Delphi procedures in manpower forecasting. Manag Sci 19:381–388CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Khorramshahgol R, Moustakis V (1988) Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): a methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 37:347–354CrossRef Khorramshahgol R, Moustakis V (1988) Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): a methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 37:347–354CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12:1–8 Hsu C-C, Sandford BA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12:1–8
Metadata
Title
The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training
Authors
Mona W. Schmidt
Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
Marc L. Schmidt
Erica Wennberg
Carly R. Garrow
Sang Paik
Laura Benner
Marlies P. Schijven
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Felix Nickel
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6480-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019 Go to the issue