Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Dynamic Manuscript

Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD

Authors: Tomoki Aburatani, Kazuyuki Kojima, Sho Otsuki, Hideaki Murase, Keisuke Okuno, Kentaro Gokita, Chiharu Tomii, Toshiro Tanioka, Mikito Inokuchi

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is widely performed in Japan as a function-preserving surgical approach. Since esophagogastrostomy (EG) was associated with increased reflux symptoms and anastomotic strictures, we have chosen double-tract reconstruction (DTR) as the standard reconstruction method since March 2013. In this study, we described a novel method of laparoscopic DTR using detachable ENDO-PSD and compared its 1-year outcome with EG performed formerly in our institution.

Methods

Patients who underwent laparoscopic PG between May 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively divided into two groups based on the type of reconstruction and were subsequently analyzed (19 patients in the DTR group and 22 in the EG group). All of them underwent a laparoscopic PG with regional lymph node dissection. In the DTR group, the lower left port site was extended to 4 cm, and an intracorporeal purse-string suture was performed using the detachable ENDO-PSD. The jejunogastrostomy was fashioned on the anterior side of the remnant stomach parallel to the transection line, 2 cm from the cut end. The EG group used the conventional purse-string suture instrument through the 6 cm upper midline mini-laparotomy incision. Patient characteristics, operative data, early operative complications and 1-year postoperative follow-up findings were compared between the two groups.

Results

The frequencies of reflux symptoms (10.5 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.003), usage of proton pump inhibitors (31.6 vs. 72.7%, P = 0.008), and anastomotic strictures (0 vs. 27%, P = 0.014) were significantly lower in the DTR group as compared to the EG group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, average postoperative/preoperative weight loss ratio, and postoperative/preoperative ratio of biochemical markers (hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, cholesterol).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that DTR is a useful reconstruction method after PG, especially in terms of preventing reflux esophagitis and anastomotic strictures.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH et al (2011) Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg 98:255–260CrossRefPubMed Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH et al (2011) Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg 98:255–260CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF (1998) Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery 123:127–130CrossRefPubMed Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF (1998) Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery 123:127–130CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim JH, Park SS, Kim J, Boo YJ, Kim SJ, Mok YJ, Kim CS (2006) Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. World J Surg 30:1870–1876 (discussion 1877–1878) CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Park SS, Kim J, Boo YJ, Kim SJ, Mok YJ, Kim CS (2006) Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. World J Surg 30:1870–1876 (discussion 1877–1878) CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T et al (2015) Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer 18:407–416CrossRefPubMed Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T et al (2015) Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer 18:407–416CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zhao P, Xiao SM, Tang LC, Ding Z, Zhou X, Chen XD (2014) Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20:8268–8273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao P, Xiao SM, Tang LC, Ding Z, Zhou X, Chen XD (2014) Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20:8268–8273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A (2013) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 37:558–564CrossRefPubMed Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A (2013) Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 37:558–564CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Fujita J et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg 38:1100–1106CrossRefPubMed Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Fujita J et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg 38:1100–1106CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B, Chen XL, Wang L, Yang K et al (2012) Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 59:633–640PubMed Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B, Chen XL, Wang L, Yang K et al (2012) Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 59:633–640PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pu YW, Gong W, Wu YY, Chen Q, He TF, Xing CG (2013) Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. A meta-analysis on postoperative complications, 5-year survival, and recurrence rate. Saudi Med J 34:1223–1228PubMed Pu YW, Gong W, Wu YY, Chen Q, He TF, Xing CG (2013) Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. A meta-analysis on postoperative complications, 5-year survival, and recurrence rate. Saudi Med J 34:1223–1228PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kumagai K, Shimizu K, Yokoyama N, Aida S, Arima S, Aikou T (2012) The Japanese Society for the Study of Postoperative Morbidity after Gastrectomy. Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan. Surg Today 42:411–418CrossRefPubMed Kumagai K, Shimizu K, Yokoyama N, Aida S, Arima S, Aikou T (2012) The Japanese Society for the Study of Postoperative Morbidity after Gastrectomy. Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan. Surg Today 42:411–418CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ahn SH, do Jung H, Son SY, Lee CM, do Park J, Kim HH (2014) Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:562–570CrossRefPubMed Ahn SH, do Jung H, Son SY, Lee CM, do Park J, Kim HH (2014) Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:562–570CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y, Osugi H (2007) Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer. Br J Surg 94:204–207CrossRefPubMed Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y, Osugi H (2007) Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer. Br J Surg 94:204–207CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Uyama I, Sugioka A, Fujita J, Komori Y, Matsui H, Hasumi A (2000) Completely laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 191:114–119CrossRefPubMed Uyama I, Sugioka A, Fujita J, Komori Y, Matsui H, Hasumi A (2000) Completely laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 191:114–119CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ (2005) Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol 90:139–146CrossRefPubMed Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ (2005) Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol 90:139–146CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2009) International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (eds) (2009) International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
17.
go back to reference Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, Fennerty MB, Janssens J, Kahrilas PJ et al (1999) An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 44:1–16CrossRef Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, Fennerty MB, Janssens J, Kahrilas PJ et al (1999) An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management—the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 44:1–16CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kubo M, Sasako M, Gotoda T, Ono H, Fujishiro M, Saito D et al (2002) Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification. Gastric Cancer 5:83–89CrossRefPubMed Kubo M, Sasako M, Gotoda T, Ono H, Fujishiro M, Saito D et al (2002) Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification. Gastric Cancer 5:83–89CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Association Japanese Gastric Cancer (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef Association Japanese Gastric Cancer (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2013) Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gas Cancer 16:282–289CrossRef Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2013) Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gas Cancer 16:282–289CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T (2010) Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 97:558–562. doi:10.1002/bjs.6944 CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T (2010) Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 97:558–562. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6944 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nomura E, Lee SW, Kawai M, Yamazaki M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, Uchiyama K (2014) Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition. World J Surg Oncol 12:20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nomura E, Lee SW, Kawai M, Yamazaki M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, Uchiyama K (2014) Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition. World J Surg Oncol 12:20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Hoshino E, Nunobe S, Fukunaga T et al (2008) Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 32:1473–1477CrossRefPubMed Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Hoshino E, Nunobe S, Fukunaga T et al (2008) Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 32:1473–1477CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Johansson J, Zilling T, von Holstein CS, Johnsson F, Oberg S, Walther B (2000) Anastomotic diameters and strictures following esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in 256 patients. World J Surg 24:78–84 (discussion 84–85) CrossRefPubMed Johansson J, Zilling T, von Holstein CS, Johnsson F, Oberg S, Walther B (2000) Anastomotic diameters and strictures following esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in 256 patients. World J Surg 24:78–84 (discussion 84–85) CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ (2013) A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 37:1043–1050CrossRefPubMed Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ (2013) A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 37:1043–1050CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Braga M, Zuliani W, Foppa L, Di Carlo V, Cristallo M (1988) Food intake and nutritional status after total gastrectomy: results of a nutritional follow-up. Br J Surg 75:477–480PubMed Braga M, Zuliani W, Foppa L, Di Carlo V, Cristallo M (1988) Food intake and nutritional status after total gastrectomy: results of a nutritional follow-up. Br J Surg 75:477–480PubMed
28.
go back to reference Bergh C, Sjostedt S, Hellers G, Zandian M, Sodersten P (2003) Meal size, satiety and cholecystokinin in gastrectomized humans. Physiol Behav 78:143–147CrossRefPubMed Bergh C, Sjostedt S, Hellers G, Zandian M, Sodersten P (2003) Meal size, satiety and cholecystokinin in gastrectomized humans. Physiol Behav 78:143–147CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Katai H, Sano T, Fukagawa T, Shinohara H, Sasako M (2003) Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 90:850–853CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Sano T, Fukagawa T, Shinohara H, Sasako M (2003) Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 90:850–853CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD
Authors
Tomoki Aburatani
Kazuyuki Kojima
Sho Otsuki
Hideaki Murase
Keisuke Okuno
Kentaro Gokita
Chiharu Tomii
Toshiro Tanioka
Mikito Inokuchi
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5539-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2017 Go to the issue