Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017

01-02-2017

Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Authors: Salvatore Docimo Jr., Abraham Mathew, Alexander J. Shope, Joshua S. Winder, Randy S. Haluck, Eric M. Pauli

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive therapy for achalasia with a shorter hospitalization but with similar short- and long-term outcomes as a laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Previous literature comparing POEM to LHM has focused primarily on postoperative outcome parameters such as complications, dysphagia scores and gastro-esophageal reflux severity. This study specifically compares postoperative pain following POEM to pain following LHM, the current gold-standard operation.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing POEM or LHM for achalasia was performed from 2006 to 2015. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS) and pain scores (arrival to the recovery room, 1 h postoperative, average first 24 h and upon discharge). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test and Chi-square test.

Results

Forty-four POEM patients and 122 LHM patients were identified. The average age (52.2 ± 20.75 vs 50.9 ± 17.89 years, p = 0.306) and BMI (28.1 ± 7.62 vs 27.6 ± 7.07 kg/m2, p = 0.824) did not differ between the POEM and LHM groups, respectively; however, the American Society of Anesthesiology scores were higher in the POEM patients (2.43 ± 0.62 vs 2.11 ± 0.71, p = 0.011). There were no differences in rates of smoking, diabetes, cardiac disease or pulmonary disease. The average pain scores upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively were lower in the POEM group (2.3 ± 3.014 vs 3.61 ± 3 0.418, p = 0.025 and 2.2 ± 2.579 vs 3.46 ± 3.063, p = 0.034, respectively). There was no difference in the average pain score over the first 24 h (2.7 ± 2.067 vs 3.29 ± 1.980, p = 0.472) or at the time of discharge (1.6 ± 2.420 vs 2.09 ± 2.157, p = 0.0657) between the POEM and LHM groups. After standardizing opioid administration against 10 mg of oral morphine, the POEM group used significantly less narcotics that the LHM group (35.8 vs 101.8 mg, p < 0.001) while hospitalized. The average LOS for the POEM group was 31.2 h and 55.79 for the LHM group (p < 0.0001). At discharge, fewer POEM patients required a prescription for a narcotic analgesic (6.81 vs 92.4 %, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

POEM demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively. To achieve similar pain scores during the first 24 h and at discharge, LHM patients required more narcotic analgesic administration. Despite a significantly shorter LOS, fewer POEM patients require a prescription for narcotic analgesics compared to LHM. POEM is a less painful procedure for achalasia than LHM, permitting earlier hospital discharge with little need for home narcotic use.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Neill OM, Johnston BT, Coleman HG (2013) Achalasia: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 19:5806–5812CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Neill OM, Johnston BT, Coleman HG (2013) Achalasia: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 19:5806–5812CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Vaezi MF, Richter JE (1999) Diagnosis and management of achalasia. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameter Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3406–3412CrossRefPubMed Vaezi MF, Richter JE (1999) Diagnosis and management of achalasia. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameter Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3406–3412CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reynolds JC, Parkman HP (1989) Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 18:223–255 Reynolds JC, Parkman HP (1989) Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 18:223–255
4.
go back to reference Bredenwood AJ, Rosch T, Fockens P (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:3–12CrossRef Bredenwood AJ, Rosch T, Fockens P (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:3–12CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Karamanolis G, Sgouros S, Karatzias G, Papadopoulou E, Vasiliadis K, Stefanidis G, Mantides A (2005) Long-term outcome of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 100:270–274CrossRefPubMed Karamanolis G, Sgouros S, Karatzias G, Papadopoulou E, Vasiliadis K, Stefanidis G, Mantides A (2005) Long-term outcome of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 100:270–274CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pasricha PJ, Rai R, Ravich WJ, Hendrix TR, Kalloo AN (1996) Botulinum toxin for achalasia: long-term outcome and predictors of response. Gastroenterology 110:1410–1415CrossRefPubMed Pasricha PJ, Rai R, Ravich WJ, Hendrix TR, Kalloo AN (1996) Botulinum toxin for achalasia: long-term outcome and predictors of response. Gastroenterology 110:1410–1415CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zaninotto G, Annese V, Costantini M, Del Genio A, Costantino M, Epifani M, Gatto G, D’onofrio V, Benini L, Contini S, Molena D, Battaglia G, Tardio B, Andriulli A, Ancona E (2004) Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Ann Surg 239(3):364–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zaninotto G, Annese V, Costantini M, Del Genio A, Costantino M, Epifani M, Gatto G, D’onofrio V, Benini L, Contini S, Molena D, Battaglia G, Tardio B, Andriulli A, Ancona E (2004) Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Ann Surg 239(3):364–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271CrossRefPubMed Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wang L, Li Y-M, Li L (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized and controlled treatment trials for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 54:2303–2311CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Li Y-M, Li L (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized and controlled treatment trials for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 54:2303–2311CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Talukdar R, Inoue H, Reddy DN (2015) Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3030–3046CrossRefPubMed Talukdar R, Inoue H, Reddy DN (2015) Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3030–3046CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ponsky JL, Marks JM, Pauli EM (2012) How I Do It: per-Oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1251–1255CrossRefPubMed Ponsky JL, Marks JM, Pauli EM (2012) How I Do It: per-Oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1251–1255CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tomasko JM (2014) Quality of life comparing Dor and Toupet after Heller myotomy for achalasia. JSLS 18(3):1–6CrossRef Tomasko JM (2014) Quality of life comparing Dor and Toupet after Heller myotomy for achalasia. JSLS 18(3):1–6CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shaheen PE, Walsh D, Lasheen W, Davis MP, Lagman RL (2009) Opiod equianalgesic tables: are they all equally dangerous? J Pain Symptom Manage 38(3):409–417CrossRefPubMed Shaheen PE, Walsh D, Lasheen W, Davis MP, Lagman RL (2009) Opiod equianalgesic tables: are they all equally dangerous? J Pain Symptom Manage 38(3):409–417CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Knotkova H, Fine PG, Portenoy RK (2009) Opioid rotation: the science and the limitations of the equianalgesic dose table. J Pain Symptom Manage 38(3):426–439CrossRefPubMed Knotkova H, Fine PG, Portenoy RK (2009) Opioid rotation: the science and the limitations of the equianalgesic dose table. J Pain Symptom Manage 38(3):426–439CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL (2014) A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 259(6):1098–1103CrossRefPubMed Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL (2014) A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 259(6):1098–1103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, Arafat FO, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Soper NJ (2013) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17(2):228–235CrossRefPubMed Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, Arafat FO, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Soper NJ (2013) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17(2):228–235CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 154(4):893–897CrossRefPubMed Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 154(4):893–897CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Myotomy Inoue Per-Oral Endoscopic (2015) A series of 500 patients. JACS 221:256–264 Myotomy Inoue Per-Oral Endoscopic (2015) A series of 500 patients. JACS 221:256–264
20.
go back to reference Orenstein Peroral endoscopic myotomy (2015) (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic surgical therapy. Surg Endosc 29(5):1064–1070CrossRef Orenstein Peroral endoscopic myotomy (2015) (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic surgical therapy. Surg Endosc 29(5):1064–1070CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy
Authors
Salvatore Docimo Jr.
Abraham Mathew
Alexander J. Shope
Joshua S. Winder
Randy S. Haluck
Eric M. Pauli
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017 Go to the issue