Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016

01-04-2016

Efficacy and safety of Hybrid-APC for the ablation of Barrett’s esophagus

Authors: Hendrik Manner, Andrea May, Ioanna Kouti, Oliver Pech, Michael Vieth, Christian Ell

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and study aim

After thermal ablation of Barrett’s esophagus (BE), stricture formation is reported in 5 to over 10 % of patients. The question arises whether submucosal fluid injection prior to ablation may lower the risk of stricture formation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new technique of Hybrid-APC which combines submucosal injection with APC.

Patients and methods

Patients who had a residual BE segment of at least 1 cm after endoscopic resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia underwent thermal ablation of BE by Hybrid-APC. Prior to thermal ablation, submucosal injection of sodium chloride 0.9 % was carried out using a flexible water-jet probe (Erbejet 2; Erbe Elektromedizin, Tuebingen, Germany). Check-up upper GI endoscopy was carried out 3 months after macroscopically complete ablation including biopsies from the neo-Z-line and the former BE segment, and recording of stricture formation.

Results

From May 2011 to November 2012, a total of 60 patients (pt) were included in the study [55 pt male (92 %); mean age 62 ± 9 years, range 42–79]. Ten patients were excluded from the study. In the remaining 50 pt, Hybrid-APC ablation and check-up endoscopy at 3 months were carried out. Forty-eight out of 50 pt (96 %; ITT: 49/60, 82 %) achieved macroscopically complete remission after a median of 3.5 APC sessions [SD 2.4; range 1–10]. Freedom from BE was histopathologically observed in 39/50 patients (78 %). There was one treatment-related stricture (2 %). Minor adverse events of Hybrid-APC were observed in 11 patients (22 %).

Conclusions

According to this pilot series, Hybrid-APC was effective and safe for BE ablation in a tertiary referral center. The rate of stricture formation was only 2 %. Further studies are required to confirm the present results.

German Clinical Trials Register

DRKS00003369.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ell C, May A, Gossner L et al (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 118(4):670–677CrossRefPubMed Ell C, May A, Gossner L et al (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 118(4):670–677CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pech O, May A, Manner H et al (2014) Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 146(3):652–660CrossRefPubMed Pech O, May A, Manner H et al (2014) Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 146(3):652–660CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Manner H, Rabenstein T, Pech O et al (2014) Ablation of residual Barrett’s epithelium after endoscopic resection: a randomized long-term follow-up study of argon plasma coagulation vs. surveillance (APE study). Endoscopy 46(1):6–12PubMed Manner H, Rabenstein T, Pech O et al (2014) Ablation of residual Barrett’s epithelium after endoscopic resection: a randomized long-term follow-up study of argon plasma coagulation vs. surveillance (APE study). Endoscopy 46(1):6–12PubMed
4.
go back to reference Phoa KN, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG et al (2013) Remission of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology 145(1):96–104CrossRefPubMed Phoa KN, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG et al (2013) Remission of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology 145(1):96–104CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57:1200–1206CrossRefPubMed Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57:1200–1206CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ell C, May A, Pech O et al (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65:3–10CrossRefPubMed Ell C, May A, Pech O et al (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65:3–10CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF et al (2009) Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med 360:2277–2288CrossRefPubMed Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF et al (2009) Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med 360:2277–2288CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Manner H, May A, Miehlke S et al (2006) Ablation of nonneoplastic Barrett’s mucosa using argon plasma coagulation with concomitant esomeprazole therapy (APBANEX): a prospective multicenter evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1762–1769CrossRefPubMed Manner H, May A, Miehlke S et al (2006) Ablation of nonneoplastic Barrett’s mucosa using argon plasma coagulation with concomitant esomeprazole therapy (APBANEX): a prospective multicenter evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1762–1769CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pasricha S, Bulsiewicz WJ, Hathorn KE et al (2014) Durability and predictors of successful radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(11):1840–1847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pasricha S, Bulsiewicz WJ, Hathorn KE et al (2014) Durability and predictors of successful radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(11):1840–1847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Gupta M, Iyer PG, Lutzke L et al (2013) Recurrence of esophageal intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: results from a US multicenter consortium. Gastroenterology 145(1):79–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta M, Iyer PG, Lutzke L et al (2013) Recurrence of esophageal intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: results from a US multicenter consortium. Gastroenterology 145(1):79–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Schulz H, Miehlke S, Antos D et al (2000) Ablation of Barrett’s epithelium by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation in combination with high-dose omeprazole. Gastrointest Endosc 51:659–663PubMed Schulz H, Miehlke S, Antos D et al (2000) Ablation of Barrett’s epithelium by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation in combination with high-dose omeprazole. Gastrointest Endosc 51:659–663PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pereira-Lima JC, Busnello JV, Saul C et al (2000) Higher power setting argon plasma coagulation for the eradication of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1661–1668CrossRefPubMed Pereira-Lima JC, Busnello JV, Saul C et al (2000) Higher power setting argon plasma coagulation for the eradication of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1661–1668CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Manner H, May A, Rabenstein T et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of a new high-power argon plasma coagulation system (hp-APC) in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(3):397–405CrossRefPubMed Manner H, May A, Rabenstein T et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of a new high-power argon plasma coagulation system (hp-APC) in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(3):397–405CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Manner H, Enderle MD, Pech O et al (2008) Second-generation argon plasma coagulation: two-center experience with 600 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(6):872–878CrossRefPubMed Manner H, Enderle MD, Pech O et al (2008) Second-generation argon plasma coagulation: two-center experience with 600 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(6):872–878CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Orman ES, Li N, Shaheen NJ (2013) Efficay and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(10):1245–1255CrossRefPubMed Orman ES, Li N, Shaheen NJ (2013) Efficay and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(10):1245–1255CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL et al (2014) Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311(12):1209–1217CrossRefPubMed Phoa KN, van Vilsteren FG, Weusten BL et al (2014) Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311(12):1209–1217CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Norton ID, Wang L, Levine SA et al (2002) Efficacy of colonic submucosal saline solution injection for the reduction of iatrogenic thermal injury. Gastrointest Endosc 56:95–99CrossRefPubMed Norton ID, Wang L, Levine SA et al (2002) Efficacy of colonic submucosal saline solution injection for the reduction of iatrogenic thermal injury. Gastrointest Endosc 56:95–99CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M et al (2006) Submucosal injection of normal saline may prevent tissue damage from argon plasma coagulation: an experimental study using resected porcine esophagus, stomach, and colon. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):307–311CrossRefPubMed Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M et al (2006) Submucosal injection of normal saline may prevent tissue damage from argon plasma coagulation: an experimental study using resected porcine esophagus, stomach, and colon. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):307–311CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Ono S et al (2008) Submucosal injection of normal saline can prevent unexpected deep thermal injury of argon plasma coagulation in the in vivo porcine stomach. Gut Liver 2(2):95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Ono S et al (2008) Submucosal injection of normal saline can prevent unexpected deep thermal injury of argon plasma coagulation in the in vivo porcine stomach. Gut Liver 2(2):95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Manner H, Neugebauer A, Scharpf M et al (2014) The tissue effect of argon-plasma coagulation with prior submucosal injection (Hybrid-APC) versus standard APC: a randomized ex-vivo study. United European Gastroenterol J 2(5):383–390CrossRef Manner H, Neugebauer A, Scharpf M et al (2014) The tissue effect of argon-plasma coagulation with prior submucosal injection (Hybrid-APC) versus standard APC: a randomized ex-vivo study. United European Gastroenterol J 2(5):383–390CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D et al (2006) The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C&M Criteria. Gastroenterology 131:1392–1399CrossRefPubMed Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D et al (2006) The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C&M Criteria. Gastroenterology 131:1392–1399CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE et al (2011) Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology 141(2):460–468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE et al (2011) Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology 141(2):460–468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Haidry RJ, Dunn JM, Butt MA et al (2013) Radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection for dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: outcomes of the UK National Halo RFA Registry. Gastroenterology 145(1):87–95CrossRefPubMed Haidry RJ, Dunn JM, Butt MA et al (2013) Radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection for dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: outcomes of the UK National Halo RFA Registry. Gastroenterology 145(1):87–95CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pouw R, Visser M, Odze RD et al (2014) Pseudo-buried Barrett’s post radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus, with or without prior endoscopic resection. Endoscopy 46(2):105–109PubMed Pouw R, Visser M, Odze RD et al (2014) Pseudo-buried Barrett’s post radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus, with or without prior endoscopic resection. Endoscopy 46(2):105–109PubMed
25.
go back to reference Zhou C, Tsai TH, Lee HC et al (2012) Characterization of buried glands before and after radiofrequency ablation by using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 76:32–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou C, Tsai TH, Lee HC et al (2012) Characterization of buried glands before and after radiofrequency ablation by using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 76:32–40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Fudman DI, Lightdale CJ, Poneros JM et al (2014) Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 80(1):71–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fudman DI, Lightdale CJ, Poneros JM et al (2014) Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 80(1):71–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of Hybrid-APC for the ablation of Barrett’s esophagus
Authors
Hendrik Manner
Andrea May
Ioanna Kouti
Oliver Pech
Michael Vieth
Christian Ell
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4336-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2016 Go to the issue