Top

Surgical Endoscopy

Published in:

01-11-2015 | Review

Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review

Authors: Amir Ali, Yousif Subhi, Charlotte Ringsted, Lars Konge

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2015

Abstract

Background

Females are less attracted than males to surgical specialties, which may be due to differences in the acquisition of skills. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that investigate gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive database search using relevant search phrases and MeSH terms. We included studies that investigated the role of gender in the acquisition of surgical skills.

Results

Our search yielded 247 studies, 18 of which were found to be eligible and were therefore included. These studies included a total of 2,106 study participants. The studies were qualitatively synthesized in five categories (studies on medical students, studies on both medical students and residents, studies on residents, studies on gender differences in needed physical strength, and studies on other gender-related training conditions). Male medical students tended to outperform females, while no gender differences were found among residents. Gaming experience and interest in surgery correlated with better acquisition of surgical skills, regardless of gender. Although initial levels of surgical abilities seemed lower among females, one-on-one training and instructor feedback worked better on females and were able to help the acquisition of surgical skills at a level that negated measurable gender differences. Female physicians possess the required physical strength for surgical procedures, but may face gender-related challenges in daily clinical practice.

Conclusion

Medical students are a heterogeneous group with a range of interests and experiences, while surgical residents are more homogeneous perhaps due to selection bias. Gender-related differences are more pronounced among medical students. Future surgical curricula should consider tailoring personalized programs that accommodate more mentoring and one-on-one training for female physicians while giving male physicians more practice opportunities in order to increase the output of surgical training and acquisition of surgical skills.

Wirtzfeld DA (2009) The history of women in surgery. Can J Surg 52:317–320PubMedCentralPubMed

Levinson W, Lurie N (2004) when most doctors are women: What lies ahead? Ann Intern Med 141:471–474CrossRefPubMed

Ramakrishnan A, Sambuco D, Jagsi R (2014) Women’s Participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 23:927–934CrossRef

Pedersen LT, Bak NH, Dissing AS, Petersson BH (2011) Gender bias in specialty preferences among Danish medical students: a cross-sectional study. Dan Med Bull 58:A4304PubMed

Pakkenberg B, Gundersen HJ (1997) Neocortical neuron number in humans: effect of sex and age. J Comp Neurol 384:312–320CrossRefPubMed

Stark AK, Toft MH, Pakkenberg H, Fabricius K, Eriksen N, Pelvig DP, Møller M, Pakkenberg B (2007) The effect of age and gender on the volume and size distribution of neocortical neurons. Neuroscience 150:121–130CrossRefPubMed

Luders E, Gaser C, Narr KL, Toga AW (2009) Why sex matters: brain size independent differences in gray matter distributions between men and women. J Neurosci 29:14265–14270PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Baron-Cohen S, Knickmeyer RC, Belmonte MK (2005) Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science 310:819–823CrossRefPubMed

Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Fletcher JM, Shankweiler DP, Katz L, Gore JC (1995) Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373:607–609CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kimura D (1996) Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:259–263CrossRefPubMed

11.

Adam JJ, Paas FG, Buekers MJ, Wuyts IJ, Spijkers WA, Wallmeyer P (1999) Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics 42:327–335CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sneider JT, Hamilton DA, Cohen-Gilbert JE, Crowley DJ, Rosso IM, Silveri MM (2014) Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults. Behav Process 111C:42–50

13.

Schoenfeld R, Lehmann W, Leplow B (2010) Effects of age and sex and mental rotation and spatial learning from virtual environments. J Individ Differ 31:78–82CrossRef

14.

Kimura D, Hampson E (1994) Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 3:57–61CrossRef

15.

Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C (2011) Test-enhanced learning may be a gender-related phenomenon explained by changes in cortisol level. Med Educ 45:192–199CrossRefPubMed

16.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRef

17.

Elneel FH, Carter F, Tang B, Cuschieri A (2008) Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:31–37CrossRefPubMed

18.

Enochsson L, Isaksson B, Tour R, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Wredmark T, Tsai-Felländer L (2004) Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:876–882CrossRefPubMed

19.

Madan AK, Harper JL, Frantzides CT, Tichansky DS (2008) Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg Endosc 22:1686–1689CrossRefPubMed

20.

Thorson CM, Kelly JP, Forse RA, Turaga KK (2011) Can we continue to ignore gender differences in performance on simulation trainers? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:329–333CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kolozsvari NO, Andalib A, Kaneva P, Cao J, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2011) Sex is not everything: the role of gender in early performance of a fundamental laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc 25:1037–1042CrossRefPubMed

22.

Schlickum M, Fellander-Tsai L, Hedman L, Henningsohn L (2013) Endourological simulator performance in female but not male medical students predicts written examination results in basic surgery. Scand J Urol 47:38–42PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

23.

Donnon T, DesCoteaux JG, Violato C (2005) Impact of cognitive imaging and sex differences on the development of laparoscopic suturing skills. Can J Surg 48:387–393PubMedCentralPubMed

24.

Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2013) Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 257:839–844CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290CrossRefPubMed

26.

Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CB, Smith CD (2008) Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg Endosc 22:1294–1297CrossRefPubMed

27.

White MT, Welch K (2012) Does gender predict performance of novices undergoing fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) training? Am J Surg 203:397–400CrossRefPubMed

28.

Schueneman AL, Pickleman J, Freeark RJ (1985) Age, gender, lateral dominance, and prediction of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 98:506–515PubMed

29.

Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:1082–1085CrossRefPubMed

30.

Van HC, Perry KA, Spight DH, Wheeler-Mcinvaille K, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Jobe BA, O’Rourke RW (2008) Predictors of technical skill acquisition among resident trainees in a laparoscopic skills education program. World J Surg 32:1917–1921CrossRef

31.

Leslie KK, Dipasquale-Lehnerz P, Smith M (2005) Obstetric forceps training using visual feedback and the isometric strength testing unit. Obstet Gynecol 105:377–382CrossRefPubMed

32.

Waddington MS, Paech MJ, Kurowski IH, Reed CJ, Nicholls GJ, Guy DT, Day RE (2009) The influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and technique: a manikin study. Anaesth Intensive Care 37:791–801PubMed

33.

Bonar KD, Kaunitz AM, Sanchez-Ramos L (2000) The effect of obstetric resident gender on forceps delivery rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1050–1051CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gibson A, Boulton MG, Watson MP, Moseley MJ, Murray PI, Fielder AR (2005) The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology. Eye (Lond) 19:1264–1270CrossRef

35.

Peschers UM, Tunn R, Dejewski C, Koelbl H (2008) Urogynecological training, testing and treatment among gynecologists in Germany. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 140:118–123CrossRefPubMed

36.

Konge L, Ali A, Sørensen M, Bitsch M (2011) Gender differences among medical students in the approach to simulation. Ugeskr Laeger 173:3170–3173PubMed

37.

Blatter K, Graw P, Munch M, Knoblauch V, Wirz-Justice A, Cajochen C (2006) Gender and age differences in psychomotor vigilance performance under differential sleep pressure conditions. Behav Brain Res 168:312–317CrossRefPubMed

38.

Noble C, Baker BL, Jones TA (1964) Age and sex parameters in psychomotor learning. Percept Mot Skills 19:935–945CrossRefPubMed

39.

Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 125:367–383CrossRef

40.

Quine L (2002) Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey. BMJ 324:878–879PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

41.

Dageforde LA, Kibbe M, Jackson GP (2013) Recruiting women to vascular surgery and other surgical specialties. J Vasc Surg 57:262–267CrossRefPubMed

Title: Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review
Authors: Amir Ali
Yousif Subhi
Charlotte Ringsted
Lars Konge
Publication date: 01-11-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4092-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Endoscopic full-thickness resection with defect closure using an over-the-scope clip for gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria

No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study

Intra-abdominal bacterial contamination in TAMIS total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: a prospective study

Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs

Surgery duration predicts urinary retention after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution review

Laparoscopic surgery minimizes the release of circulating tumor cells compared to open surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma