Top

Published in:

01-01-2015

Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

Authors: Takeshi Mizushima, Mototsugu Kato, Ichiro Iwanaga, Fumiyuki Sato, Kimitoshi Kubo, Nobuyuki Ehira, Minoru Uebayashi, Shouko Ono, Manabu Nakagawa, Katsuhiro Mabe, Yuichi Shimizu, Naoya Sakamoto

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2015

Abstract

Background

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment for colorectal tumors, but is technically more difficult and has a higher risk of complications such as perforation than gastric ESD. Few studies have investigated the factors associated with technical difficulty and perforation in colorectal ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the technical difficulty according to location, and the risk factors for perforation, in colorectal ESD.

Methods

This retrospective study included 134 consecutive colorectal tumors treated by ESD in 122 patients at the Division of Endoscopy of Hokkaido University Hospital and the Department of Gastroenterology of Kitami Red Cross Hospital from November 2011 to February 2013. To evaluate the technical difficulty of performing ESD for colorectal tumors at specific locations, the en bloc R0 resection rate, specimen diameter, procedure speed, and procedure time were compared among tumor locations using the χ ² test or analysis of variance. Risk factors for perforation were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The en bloc R0 resection rate was 86.6 % (116/134), the mean tumor diameter was 27.1 mm, and the mean procedure time was 63.5 min. The mean speed of procedures was significantly slower in the sigmoid colon (24.7 min/cm²) than in other areas. Perforation occurred in nine cases (6.7 %). Submucosal fibrosis was the only factor independently associated with perforation (odds ratio 5.684, 95 % confidence interval 1.307–24.727).

Conclusions

ESD was slower for sigmoid colon tumors than for tumors in other areas, suggesting that ESD was technically more difficult in the sigmoid colon than in other colorectal areas. Submucosal fibrosis was independently associated with perforation during colorectal ESD.

Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, Nishino E, Ono W, Hirooka T, Ueda C, Iwata Y, Sugiyama T, Dozaiku T, Hirooka T, Fujita T, Inokuchi H, Azuma T (2013) 1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1000–1008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Hotta K, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Shinohara T, Oyama T (2010) Local recurrence surveillance after endoscopic resection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:S63–S68PubMedCrossRef

Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, Takahashi R, Kunihiro M, Kitadai Y, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, Chayama K (2001) Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 54:62–66PubMedCrossRef

Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M, Rex DK (2009) Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 70:344–349PubMedCrossRef

Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, Drew K, Lobo AJ (2004) Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumors: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 53:1334–1339PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y, Matsuda T (2009) Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:225–230PubMedCrossRef

Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Saito Y (2012) Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 47:635–640PubMedCrossRef

Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Mashimo Y, Joeng HK, Moriya Y, Kuwano H (2011) Comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection with transanal resection for non-invasive rectal tumor: a retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:1028–1033PubMedCrossRef

Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Kobayashi N, Sakamoto N, Yoshida N, Naito Y, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Ohya T, Ohata K, Okamura S, Iizuka S, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Fusaroli P, Bonino MA, Verra M, Morino M (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 28:427–438PubMedCrossRef

10.

Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Lee KI, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107PubMedCrossRef

12.

Tamai N, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Tajiri H (2012) Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elders: clinical and follow-up outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1493–1499PubMedCrossRef

13.

Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225PubMedCrossRef

14.

Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Kanemasa K, Sumida Y, Hasegawa D, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Kashiwa A, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yanagisawa A, Yoshikawa T (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation. Endoscopy 41:758–761PubMedCrossRef

15.

Ohta T, Ishihara R, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Nagai K, Matsui F, Kawada N, Yamashina T, Kanzaki H, Hanafusa M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Iishi H (2012) Factors predicting perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1159–1165PubMedCrossRef

16.

Toyokawa T, Inaba T, Omote S, Okamoto A, Miyasaka R, Watanabe K, Izumikawa K, Horii J, Fujita I, Ishikawa S, Morikawa T, Murakami T, Tomoda J (2012) Risk factors for perforation and delayed bleeding associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: analysis of 1123 lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:907–912PubMedCrossRef

17.

Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Mizuta Y, Shiozawa J, Kohno S (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58:331–336PubMedCrossRef

18.

Oda I, Saito D, Tada M, Iishi H, Tanabe S, Oyama T, Doi T, Otani T, Fujisaki J, Ajioka Y, Hamada T, Inoue H, Gotoda T, Yoshida S (2006) A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:262–270PubMedCrossRef

19.

Yoon JY, Kim JH, Lee JY, Hong SN, Lee SY, Sung IK, Park HS, Shim CS, Han HS (2013) Clinical outcomes for patients with perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection of laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Surg Endosc 27:487–493PubMedCrossRef

20.

Isomoto H, Nishiyama H, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ishii H, Ikeda K, Ohnita K, Nakao S, Shikuwa S (2009) Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:679–683PubMedCrossRef

21.

Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS, Lee SH, Lee DH, Kim do S, Youk EG (2012) Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 26:1587–1594PubMedCrossRef

22.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Tokyo: Kanehara and Co., Ltd.; 2009

23.

Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T, East JE, Nishino E, Ono W, Morita Y, Sanuki T, Yoshida M, Kutsumi H, Inokuchi H, Azuma T (2010) Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Endoscopy 42:714–722PubMedCrossRef

24.

Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S, Kanao H, Oka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:1329–1337PubMedCrossRef

Title: Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors
Authors: Takeshi Mizushima
Mototsugu Kato
Ichiro Iwanaga
Fumiyuki Sato
Kimitoshi Kubo
Nobuyuki Ehira
Minoru Uebayashi
Shouko Ono
Manabu Nakagawa
Katsuhiro Mabe
Yuichi Shimizu
Naoya Sakamoto
Publication date: 01-01-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer

Predictive factors of recurrence after surgical treatment for liver hydatid cyst

Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: single dock technique and technical outcomes

Laparoscopic ileo-cecal resection: the total retro-mesenteric approach

Electrical stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure after POEM

Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for nonprolapsed uteri