Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014

01-03-2014

Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?

Authors: Ankit Patel, Meghna Patel, Nathaniel Lytle, Juan P. Toro, Rachel L. Medbery, Sheryl Bluestein, Sebastian D. Perez, John F. Sweeney, S. Scott Davis, Edward Lin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

There is significant growth in the use of the robotic surgery platform in the general surgery community. Current pre-requisites for robot surgery training include performing basic tasks on a simulator and achieving a minimum overall score for each task. However, there is limited information about these tasks related to performance and time required to become proficient. We focused on critical tasks that have the highest potential for preventing inadvertent injuries, and constructed models to predict how many attempts would be needed to master the tasks depending on the user’s initial attempt.

Methods and procedures

This study was conducted using de-identified data collected over 12 months from the dV-Trainers® simulator at our institution. We analyzed tasks used in institutional surgical robot credentialing that focused on camera manipulation and energy use. Data were extracted from the Camera Targeting, Energy Dissection, and Energy Switching exercises focusing on individual metrics such as Time to Complete Exercise, Economy of Motion, Misapplied Energy Time, and Blood Volume Loss. Mixed linear models looking at sequential attempts and specific performance metrics were constructed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.

Results

Over 26,000 overall minutes of recorded use was logged in our simulator by more than 30 unique users across all exercises. An average of 15 users performed each of the analyzed exercises, with an average of eight attempts per exercise. Based on our models, on average most users would need four to five attempts to achieve 80 % proficiency for any given metric.

Conclusion

Virtual reality robotic simulators such as the dv-Trainer® can be used by general surgeons to become better robotic surgeons. Our data suggests that it can be used by a surgeon to predict how much time and effort one would need to spend on the simulator in order to become proficient with the robot, especially in critical metrics such as camera manipulation and energy application. Surgeons who require more attempts to successfully complete tasks may want to consider additional training methods, such as proctoring or hands-on laboratories, to improve robot surgery proficiency.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463PubMedCrossRef Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804PubMedCrossRef Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088–1097PubMedCrossRef Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088–1097PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM (2012) Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator: role as an assessment tool? J Urol 187:998–1002PubMedCrossRef Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM (2012) Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator: role as an assessment tool? J Urol 187:998–1002PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 187:630–637PubMedCrossRef Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 187:630–637PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24:467–472PubMedCrossRef Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24:467–472PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brinkman WM, Luursema JM, Kengen B, Schout BM, Witjes JA, Bekkers RL (2013) da Vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills. Urology 81:562–566PubMedCrossRef Brinkman WM, Luursema JM, Kengen B, Schout BM, Witjes JA, Bekkers RL (2013) da Vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills. Urology 81:562–566PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kang SG, Yang KS, Ko YH, Kang SH, Park HS, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Cheon J (2012) A study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:438–442CrossRef Kang SG, Yang KS, Ko YH, Kang SH, Park HS, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Cheon J (2012) A study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:438–442CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Scerbo MW, Sechrist C, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT (2008) Do novices display automaticity during simulator training? Am J Surg 195:210–213PubMedCrossRef Stefanidis D, Scerbo MW, Sechrist C, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT (2008) Do novices display automaticity during simulator training? Am J Surg 195:210–213PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer® is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593PubMedCrossRef Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer® is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?
Authors
Ankit Patel
Meghna Patel
Nathaniel Lytle
Juan P. Toro
Rachel L. Medbery
Sheryl Bluestein
Sebastian D. Perez
John F. Sweeney
S. Scott Davis
Edward Lin
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3231-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014 Go to the issue