Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014

01-01-2014

Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: assessment after 52 consecutive patients

Authors: Sébastien Gouy, Catherine Uzan, Stéphanie Scherier, Tristan Gauthier, Enrica Bentivegna, Aminata Kane, Philippe Morice, Frédéric Marchal

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To report the feasibility and reproducibility of single-port extraperitoneal para-aortic (PA) lymphadenectomy exclusively using conventional instruments in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to evaluate the learning curve.

Methods

From January 2011 to January 2013, 52 a total of consecutive patients with LACC were candidates for extraperitoneal PA lymphadenectomy via an original single-port approach that we developed. All patients underwent positron emission tomography–computed tomography that indicated no PA uptake.

Results

Fifty consecutive patients underwent single-port staging surgery. Two patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis and were not submitted to PA lymphadenectomy. Median age and body mass index were, respectively 47 (range 27–68) years and 23 (range 16–37) kg/m2. In one case, lymphadenectomy was unfeasible because of renal vessel anomalies (a bifurcated left renal vein crossed the aorta at the level of the inferior mesenteric artery), and two nodes were removed. Conventional instruments were used in all cases. The median operative time was 180 (range 110–270) min. The median and mean number of nodes removed were, respectively, 18 (range 2–47) and 19.4. Six (12 %) patients had metastatic PA disease. No conversion to laparotomy or conventional multiport laparoscopy was required. The median postoperative hospital stay and the interval between staging surgery and the beginning of chemoradiation were, respectively, 2 (range 1–26) days and 16.5 (range 1–60) days. The learning curve was evaluated at seven procedures with a decreased median operative time at 160 (range 110–240) min.

Conclusions

Extraperitoneal staging via a single-port left iliac approach is feasible with conventional tools, is reproducible and safe, and offers a high degree of cosmetic satisfaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stehman FB, Bundy BN, DiSaia PJ, Keys HM, Larson JE, Fowler WC (1991) Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer 67(11):2776–2785PubMedCrossRef Stehman FB, Bundy BN, DiSaia PJ, Keys HM, Larson JE, Fowler WC (1991) Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer 67(11):2776–2785PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heller PB, Maletano JH, Bundy BN, Barnhill DR, Okagaki T (1990) Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 38(3):425–430PubMedCrossRef Heller PB, Maletano JH, Bundy BN, Barnhill DR, Okagaki T (1990) Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: extended diagnostic evaluation for paraaortic node metastasis—a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 38(3):425–430PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:5802–5812CrossRef Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:5802–5812CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Varia MA, Bundy BN, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette HE, Rose PG, Connelly P (1998) Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:1015–1023PubMedCrossRef Varia MA, Bundy BN, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette HE, Rose PG, Connelly P (1998) Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:1015–1023PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Gilmore J, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E (2012) Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol 13(5):e212–e220PubMedCrossRef Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Gilmore J, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E (2012) Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol 13(5):e212–e220PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Recio FO, Piver MS, Hempling RE (1996) Pretreatment transperitoneal laparoscopic staging pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in large (> or =5 cm) stage IB2 cervical carcinoma: report of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 63(3):333PubMedCrossRef Recio FO, Piver MS, Hempling RE (1996) Pretreatment transperitoneal laparoscopic staging pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in large (> or =5 cm) stage IB2 cervical carcinoma: report of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 63(3):333PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Querleu D, Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Narducci F (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic dissection in the staging of advanced carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer 88:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef Querleu D, Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Narducci F (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic dissection in the staging of advanced carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer 88:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gouy S, Kane A, Uzan C, Gauthier T, Gilmore J, Morice P (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123(2):329–332PubMedCrossRef Gouy S, Kane A, Uzan C, Gauthier T, Gilmore J, Morice P (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123(2):329–332PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gouy S, Uzan C, Kane A, Scherier S, Gauthier T, Bentivegna E, Morice P (2012) A new single-port approach to perform a transperitoneal step and an extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a single incision. J Am Coll Surg 214(5):e25–e30PubMedCrossRef Gouy S, Uzan C, Kane A, Scherier S, Gauthier T, Bentivegna E, Morice P (2012) A new single-port approach to perform a transperitoneal step and an extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a single incision. J Am Coll Surg 214(5):e25–e30PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leblanc E, Narducci F, Frumovitz M, Lesoin A, Castelain B, Baranzelli MC, Taieb S, Fournier C, Querleu D (2007) Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 105:304–311PubMedCrossRef Leblanc E, Narducci F, Frumovitz M, Lesoin A, Castelain B, Baranzelli MC, Taieb S, Fournier C, Querleu D (2007) Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 105:304–311PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeghel G (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 26(7):1920–1923PubMedCrossRef Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeghel G (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 26(7):1920–1923PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasool N, Espalliat LR (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(7):1268–1273PubMedCrossRef Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasool N, Espalliat LR (2010) Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20(7):1268–1273PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Margulies AL, Peres A, Barranger E, Perreti I, Brouland JF, Toubet E, Sarda-Mantel LE, Thoury A, Chis C, Walker F, Luton D, Delpech Y, Koskas M (2013) Selection of patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the era of PET/CT. Anticancer Res 33(1):283–286PubMed Margulies AL, Peres A, Barranger E, Perreti I, Brouland JF, Toubet E, Sarda-Mantel LE, Thoury A, Chis C, Walker F, Luton D, Delpech Y, Koskas M (2013) Selection of patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the era of PET/CT. Anticancer Res 33(1):283–286PubMed
14.
go back to reference Uzan C, Souadka A, Gouy S, Debaere T, Duclos J, Lumbroso J, Haie-Meder C, Morice P (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET–CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16(7):1021–1027PubMedCrossRef Uzan C, Souadka A, Gouy S, Debaere T, Duclos J, Lumbroso J, Haie-Meder C, Morice P (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET–CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16(7):1021–1027PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Leblanc E, Gauthier H, Querleu D, Ferron G, Zerdoud S, Morice P, Uzan C, Lumbroso S, Lecuru F, Bats AS, Ghazzar N, Bannier M, Houvenaeghel G, Brenot-Rossi I, Narducci F (2011) Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18(8):2302–2309PubMedCrossRef Leblanc E, Gauthier H, Querleu D, Ferron G, Zerdoud S, Morice P, Uzan C, Lumbroso S, Lecuru F, Bats AS, Ghazzar N, Bannier M, Houvenaeghel G, Brenot-Rossi I, Narducci F (2011) Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18(8):2302–2309PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Jhingran A, Macapinlac HA, Euscher ED, Munsell MF, Coleman RL, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz M, Ramondetta LM (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117(9):1928–1934PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Jhingran A, Macapinlac HA, Euscher ED, Munsell MF, Coleman RL, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz M, Ramondetta LM (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117(9):1928–1934PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yildirim Y, Sehirali S, Avci ME, Yilmaz C, Ertopcu K, Tinar S, Duman Y, Sayhan S (2008) Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings. Gynecol Oncol 108(1):154–159PubMedCrossRef Yildirim Y, Sehirali S, Avci ME, Yilmaz C, Ertopcu K, Tinar S, Duman Y, Sayhan S (2008) Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings. Gynecol Oncol 108(1):154–159PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, Leblanc M, Rey A, Duvillard P (1998) Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 9:360–363CrossRef Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, Leblanc M, Rey A, Duvillard P (1998) Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 9:360–363CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, Querleu D, Coste E, Castelain B, Gibon D, LeBlanc E (2000) De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:529–533PubMedCrossRef Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, Querleu D, Coste E, Castelain B, Gibon D, LeBlanc E (2000) De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:529–533PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106:370–374PubMedCrossRef Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106:370–374PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marnitz S, Köhler C, Roth C, Füller J, Hinkelbein W, Schneider A (2005) Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 99:536–544PubMedCrossRef Marnitz S, Köhler C, Roth C, Füller J, Hinkelbein W, Schneider A (2005) Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 99:536–544PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Veyrie N, Poghosyan T, Corigliano N, Canard G, Servajean S, Bouillot JL (2013) Lateral incisional hernia repair by the retromuscular approach with polyester standard mesh: topographic considerations and long-term follow-up of 61 consecutive patients. World J Surg 37(3):538–544PubMedCrossRef Veyrie N, Poghosyan T, Corigliano N, Canard G, Servajean S, Bouillot JL (2013) Lateral incisional hernia repair by the retromuscular approach with polyester standard mesh: topographic considerations and long-term follow-up of 61 consecutive patients. World J Surg 37(3):538–544PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pan MX, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y, Xu XP, Zhang Z, Qin JS, He GL, Xu TC, Zhou CJ, Liu HY, Gao Y (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19(3):394–398PubMedCrossRef Pan MX, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y, Xu XP, Zhang Z, Qin JS, He GL, Xu TC, Zhou CJ, Liu HY, Gao Y (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19(3):394–398PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ostlie DJ, Adibe David Juang OO, Iqbal CW, Sharp SW, Snyder CL, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Holcomb GW 3rd, St Peter SD (2013) Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 48(1):209–214PubMedCrossRef Ostlie DJ, Adibe David Juang OO, Iqbal CW, Sharp SW, Snyder CL, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Holcomb GW 3rd, St Peter SD (2013) Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 48(1):209–214PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH (2013) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 257(2):214–218PubMedCrossRef Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH (2013) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 257(2):214–218PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 255(4):667–676PubMedCrossRef Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 255(4):667–676PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: assessment after 52 consecutive patients
Authors
Sébastien Gouy
Catherine Uzan
Stéphanie Scherier
Tristan Gauthier
Enrica Bentivegna
Aminata Kane
Philippe Morice
Frédéric Marchal
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3180-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014 Go to the issue