Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2013

01-12-2013

Gravity line strategy may reduce risks of intraoperative injury during laparoscopic surgery

Authors: Anlong Zhu, Chao Yuan, Daxun Piao, Tao Jiang, Hongchi Jiang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

“Tilt” of surgical view was commonly shown on the monitor due to unintentional rotation of camera along its long axis by camera driver. Surgeons may be influenced on identification of anatomical structures by the tilt vision. We aimed to analyze the surgical records and videos of laparoscopic surgery, and to reveal the correlation between intraoperative complications and tilt view.

Methods

A series of 425 consecutive patients who received laparoscopic low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection were studied, and 398 surgery videos were reviewed. Still pictures showing intraoperative injury were selected. A method was established to measure tilt angle in the still pictures according to the reference line based on several anatomic landmarks. The patients were grouped with two methods according to different study purposes. Incidence of intraoperative complication and tilt angle were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The incidence of intraoperative complications was 8.3 %. Tilt of the surgical field at different degrees (<15°, 15°–30° and >30°) was found in a relatively high rate in these surgery videos (31.4 %). Compared with controls, comparatively bigger tilt angles were found in all cases of complication group. It is interesting to note that intraoperative complications happened more often when the tilt angle was in the range of 15°–30° (72.7 %) than >30° (18.2 %). We also noted a high incidence of complication (72.7 %), while tilt angle was over 15° (26 %) in the first 100 cases; comparatively a steady declining low rate of complication occurrence (5–7 %) and also tilt angle over 15° (9–11 %) were noted in the later 298 cases.

Conclusions

Rotation of camera is common during laparoscopic procedures. The tilt view increased the risk of laparoscopic procedures. Tilt angle at 15–30° is the most dangerous rotation for laparoscopic surgeries. Therefore, we propose the “Gravity Line Strategy” principle as one of the basic operating criteria to correct the tilt angle.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Luglio G, Nelson H (2010) Laparoscopy for colon cancer: state of the art. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:777–791PubMedCrossRef Luglio G, Nelson H (2010) Laparoscopy for colon cancer: state of the art. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:777–791PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Inoue T, Kinoshita H, Satou M, Oguchi N, Kawa G, Muguruma K, Murota T, Matsuda T (2010) Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a single institute experience of 1017 procedures. J Endourol 24:253–260PubMedCrossRef Inoue T, Kinoshita H, Satou M, Oguchi N, Kawa G, Muguruma K, Murota T, Matsuda T (2010) Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a single institute experience of 1017 procedures. J Endourol 24:253–260PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Bitker MO, Vaessen C (2010) Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 25:536–542PubMedCrossRef Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Bitker MO, Vaessen C (2010) Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 25:536–542PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Poulin EC (2000) Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multiple regression analysis of 416 resections. Surg Endosc 14:258–263PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Poulin EC (2000) Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multiple regression analysis of 416 resections. Surg Endosc 14:258–263PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khoury W, Kiran RP, Jessie T, Geisler D, Remzi FH (2009) Is the laparoscopic approach to colectomy safe for the morbidly obese? Surg Endosc 24:1336–1340PubMedCrossRef Khoury W, Kiran RP, Jessie T, Geisler D, Remzi FH (2009) Is the laparoscopic approach to colectomy safe for the morbidly obese? Surg Endosc 24:1336–1340PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shin EJ, Kalloo AN (2009) Transcolonic NOTES: current experience and potential implications for urologic applications. J Endourol 23:743–746PubMedCrossRef Shin EJ, Kalloo AN (2009) Transcolonic NOTES: current experience and potential implications for urologic applications. J Endourol 23:743–746PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Duff WM (2006) Avoiding misidentification injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of cystic duct marking technique in intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 203:257–261PubMedCrossRef Duff WM (2006) Avoiding misidentification injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of cystic duct marking technique in intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 203:257–261PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–197PubMedCrossRef Jones DB, Brewer JD, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191–197PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg 201:598–603PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg 201:598–603PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hanna G, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomized study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:249–251CrossRef Hanna G, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomized study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:249–251CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conrad J, Shah AH, Divino CM, Schluender S, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle. Surg Endosc 20:504–510PubMedCrossRef Conrad J, Shah AH, Divino CM, Schluender S, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle. Surg Endosc 20:504–510PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sarker SJ, Telfah MM, Onuba L, Patel BP (in press) Objective assessment of skills acquisition during laparoscopic surgery courses. Surg Innov Sarker SJ, Telfah MM, Onuba L, Patel BP (in press) Objective assessment of skills acquisition during laparoscopic surgery courses. Surg Innov
15.
go back to reference Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol 26:1085–1088PubMedCrossRef Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol 26:1085–1088PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Faber K, Gill IS (2012) Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22:121–126PubMedCrossRef Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Faber K, Gill IS (2012) Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22:121–126PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Al-Akash M, Seymour NE, Satava RM (2009) An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc 23:2684–2691PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, Al-Akash M, Seymour NE, Satava RM (2009) An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc 23:2684–2691PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Autorino R, Haber GP, Stein RJ, Rane A, De Sio M, White MA, Yang B, de la Rosette JJ, Kaouk JH, Laguna M (2010) Laparoscopic training in urology critical analysis of current evidence. J Endourol 24:1377–1390PubMedCrossRef Autorino R, Haber GP, Stein RJ, Rane A, De Sio M, White MA, Yang B, de la Rosette JJ, Kaouk JH, Laguna M (2010) Laparoscopic training in urology critical analysis of current evidence. J Endourol 24:1377–1390PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2010) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 15:322–325CrossRef Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2010) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 15:322–325CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Machado NO (2011) Biliary complications postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism, preventive measures, and approach to management: a review. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011:967017PubMedCrossRef Machado NO (2011) Biliary complications postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism, preventive measures, and approach to management: a review. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011:967017PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Wentink M (2001) Eye–hand coordination in laparoscopy—an overview of experiments and supporting aids. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10:155–162CrossRef Breedveld P, Wentink M (2001) Eye–hand coordination in laparoscopy—an overview of experiments and supporting aids. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10:155–162CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Bittner JG, Hathaway CA, Brown JA (2008) Three-dimensional visualisation and articulating instrumentation: impact on simulated laparoscopic tasks. J Minim Access Surg 4:31–38PubMedCrossRef Bittner JG, Hathaway CA, Brown JA (2008) Three-dimensional visualisation and articulating instrumentation: impact on simulated laparoscopic tasks. J Minim Access Surg 4:31–38PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? an assessment of a 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7:211–214PubMed Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? an assessment of a 3D head-mounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7:211–214PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So J, Dong F, Kum CK, Goh P (2001) Evaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15:990–991PubMedCrossRef Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So J, Dong F, Kum CK, Goh P (2001) Evaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15:990–991PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bishop PO, Kozak W, Vakkur GJ (1962) Some quantitative aspects of the cat’s eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J Physiol 163:466–502PubMed Bishop PO, Kozak W, Vakkur GJ (1962) Some quantitative aspects of the cat’s eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J Physiol 163:466–502PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gravity line strategy may reduce risks of intraoperative injury during laparoscopic surgery
Authors
Anlong Zhu
Chao Yuan
Daxun Piao
Tao Jiang
Hongchi Jiang
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3093-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2013 Go to the issue