Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013

01-10-2013

Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture

Authors: Federico Costantino, Mario Dente, Philippe Perrin, Fadi Abou Sarhan, Philippe Keller

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed primarily to evaluate the safety of digestive running suture (in gastrojejunal and antecolic jejunojejunal anastomosis closure) using unidirectional absorbable barbed suture (V-Loc 180) in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and secondarily to assess the efficacy of V-Loc 180 in reducing operative time.

Methods

A prospective cohort study of 315 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB was performed between October 2009 and October 2012 using an identical procedure technique. For the first 76 patients, a multifilament absorbable suture was used to assess the gastrojejunal anastomosis and the antecolic jejunal suture. For the following 239 patients, a unidirectional barbed monofilament suture was used. Data including operative time, time required for gastric pouch creation, time spent in both anastomoses constructions, conversion rate, and complications were prospectively recorded.

Results

The postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Early complications were observed for 1 patient (1.3 %) in the multifilament group and for 14 patients (5.8 %) in the barbed procedure group (p > 0.05). Late complications were observed for 1 patient (1.3 %) in the multifilament group and for 5 patients (2 %) in the barbed procedure group (p > 0.05). A shortened operative time was achieved in the barbed suture group. The mean operative time was 74.3 ± 15.3 min in the Vicryl group versus 62.7 ± 15.5 min in the V-Loc group (p < 0.05). The mean operative time required to fashion the gastrojejunal anastomosis was 21.3 ± 6.3 min in the Vicryl group versus 17.4 ± 5.1 min in the V-Loc group (p < 0.05). The mean operative time required to fashion the jejunojejunal anastomosis was 21.4 ± 4.9 min in the Vicryl group versus 15.2 ± 5.5 min in the V-Loc group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The authors’ experience has demonstrated that the use of interlocked V-Loc suture during LRYGB anastomosis appears to be safe and efficient. The findings show a shortened total operative time in terms of single gastrojejunal or jejunojejunal anastomosis time. No statistically significant differences in early or late postoperative complications were observed between the V-Loc and multifilament absorbable suture patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogen CL, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288:1723–1727PubMedCrossRef Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogen CL, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288:1723–1727PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fisher BL, Schauer P (2002) Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg 184:9S–16SPubMedCrossRef Fisher BL, Schauer P (2002) Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg 184:9S–16SPubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Pope GG, Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR (2002) National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcome of bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6:855–860PubMedCrossRef Pope GG, Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR (2002) National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcome of bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6:855–860PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 249:1909–1917CrossRef Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 249:1909–1917CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Factors associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 197:548–555PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Factors associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 197:548–555PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hammad G, Gourash W (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17:212–215PubMedCrossRef Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hammad G, Gourash W (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17:212–215PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference NIH Consensus Development Conference Panel (1991) Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med 115:956–961CrossRef NIH Consensus Development Conference Panel (1991) Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med 115:956–961CrossRef
10.
go back to reference The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454CrossRef The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lönroth H, Dalenbäck J, Haglind E, Lundell L (1996) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 10:636–638PubMedCrossRef Lönroth H, Dalenbäck J, Haglind E, Lundell L (1996) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 10:636–638PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Torgerson JS, Sjöström L (2001) The Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study: rationale and results. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25(Suppl 1):S2–S4PubMedCrossRef Torgerson JS, Sjöström L (2001) The Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study: rationale and results. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25(Suppl 1):S2–S4PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Farrell MT, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, Khonn GP, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD (2009) Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 23:930–949PubMedCrossRef Farrell MT, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, Khonn GP, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD (2009) Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 23:930–949PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Costantino F, Mutter D, D’Agostino J, Dente M, Leroy J, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:65–69PubMedCrossRef Costantino F, Mutter D, D’Agostino J, Dente M, Leroy J, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:65–69PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ (2012) Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 27(4):1360–1366PubMedCrossRef Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ (2012) Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 27(4):1360–1366PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Oni G, Brown SA, Kenkel JM (2012) A comparison between barbed and nonbarbed absorbable suture for fascial closure in a porcine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:536e–541e Oni G, Brown SA, Kenkel JM (2012) A comparison between barbed and nonbarbed absorbable suture for fascial closure in a porcine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:536e–541e
20.
go back to reference Takayama S, Nakai N, Shiozaki M, Ogawa R, Sakamoto M, Takeyama H (2012) Use of barbed suture for peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:177–179PubMedCrossRef Takayama S, Nakai N, Shiozaki M, Ogawa R, Sakamoto M, Takeyama H (2012) Use of barbed suture for peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:177–179PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0763-4 PubMedCrossRef De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-012-0763-4 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ruiz de Adana JC, Hernández Matías A, Hernández Bartolomé M, Manzanedo Romero I, Leon Ledesma R, Valle Rubio A, López Herrero J, Limones Esteban M (2009) Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg 19:1274–1277PubMedCrossRef Ruiz de Adana JC, Hernández Matías A, Hernández Bartolomé M, Manzanedo Romero I, Leon Ledesma R, Valle Rubio A, López Herrero J, Limones Esteban M (2009) Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg 19:1274–1277PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens Cm, Nguyen NT (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3,464 cases. Arch Surg 138:957–961PubMedCrossRef Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens Cm, Nguyen NT (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3,464 cases. Arch Surg 138:957–961PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture
Authors
Federico Costantino
Mario Dente
Philippe Perrin
Fadi Abou Sarhan
Philippe Keller
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2993-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013 Go to the issue