Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2013

01-05-2013

Benchtop testing and comparisons among three types of through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices

Authors: Sumanth R. Daram, Shou-Jiang Tang, Ruonan Wu, S. D. Filip To

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Through-the-scope (TTS) endoscopic clipping devices are widely used. No benchtop testing or direct comparisons of these endoclips have been performed to show their rotational ability and inherent mechanical strengths during closure and after deployment. This study aimed to provide benchtop data that can be used to guide clinical applications and to promote future device research and development.

Methods

Benchtop testing and comparisons were performed for three groups of TTS clips: QuickClip2 long, resolution, and instinct clips. The main outcome measurements were device-in-endoscope retroflection angles (DIERA), opening strength, “snapping” force of acute clip closure, and neoprene pulling strength.

Results

The achievable gastroscope DIERA was 10° for QuickClip2, 3° for the resolution clip, and 10° for the instinct clip. The QuickClip and the Instinct clip rotated almost equally well under all endoscope configurations, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). With or without a sheath, the resolution clip lacked the ability to rotate. During clip opening force testing (the amount of force required to force open the jaws of a deployed clip by 3.2 mm; 3.2 mm was chosen due to the standard dimension of the gauge used for the measurement), the Instinct clips were the strongest. For the Instinct clips, an opening force of 404 ± 124 g was needed to open the closed clip, and an additional 386 ± 133 g was required to open the clip jaws to 3.2 mm. In terms of snapping force during acute closure and neoprene pulling strength, the instinct and resolution clips performed almost equally. The limitations of the study were the benchtop testing and the finite sample size for closing and pulling strength comparisons.

Conclusions

The QuickClip2 and the Instinct clip rotate equally well under different endoscope configurations. The resolution clips lack rotational ability. The instinct clips are stronger mechanically than the other two TTS clips. Stronger clips are perhaps associated with higher therapeutic efficacy and retention rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hayashi T, Yonezawa M, Kawabara T (1975) The study on staunch clip for the treatment by endoscopy. Gastroenterol Endosc 17:92–101 Hayashi T, Yonezawa M, Kawabara T (1975) The study on staunch clip for the treatment by endoscopy. Gastroenterol Endosc 17:92–101
2.
go back to reference Raju GS, Gajula L (2004) Endoclips for GI endoscopy. Gastroenterol Endosc 59:267–279CrossRef Raju GS, Gajula L (2004) Endoclips for GI endoscopy. Gastroenterol Endosc 59:267–279CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Raju GS, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R (2007) Endoscopic mechanical hemostasis of GI arterial bleeding (review with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 66:774–785PubMedCrossRef Raju GS, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R (2007) Endoscopic mechanical hemostasis of GI arterial bleeding (review with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 66:774–785PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Technology Assessment Committee, Chuttani R, Barkun A, Carpenter S, Chotiprasidhi P, Ginsberg GG, Hussain N, Liu J, Silverman W, Taitelbaum G, Petersen B (2006) Endoscopic clip application devices. Gastrointest Endosc 63:746–750PubMedCrossRef Technology Assessment Committee, Chuttani R, Barkun A, Carpenter S, Chotiprasidhi P, Ginsberg GG, Hussain N, Liu J, Silverman W, Taitelbaum G, Petersen B (2006) Endoscopic clip application devices. Gastrointest Endosc 63:746–750PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Technology Committee ASGE, Conway JD, Adler DG, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, Kaul V, Kethu SR, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Rodriguez SA, Tierney WM (2009) Endoscopic hemostatic devices (review). Gastrointest Endosc 69:987–996CrossRef Technology Committee ASGE, Conway JD, Adler DG, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, Kaul V, Kethu SR, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Rodriguez SA, Tierney WM (2009) Endoscopic hemostatic devices (review). Gastrointest Endosc 69:987–996CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kopelman Y, Siersema PD, Bapaye A, Kopelman D (2012) Endoscopic full-thickness GI wall resection: current status. Gastrointest Endosc 75:165–173PubMedCrossRef Kopelman Y, Siersema PD, Bapaye A, Kopelman D (2012) Endoscopic full-thickness GI wall resection: current status. Gastrointest Endosc 75:165–173PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gill KR, Pooley RA, Wallace MB (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of endoclips. Gastrointest Endosc 70:532–536PubMedCrossRef Gill KR, Pooley RA, Wallace MB (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of endoclips. Gastrointest Endosc 70:532–536PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCurry JB, Tang SJ, Marks C, Dave B (xxxx) Successful management of a gastric arteriovenous malformation with endoclip application and angioembolization. (submitted) McCurry JB, Tang SJ, Marks C, Dave B (xxxx) Successful management of a gastric arteriovenous malformation with endoclip application and angioembolization. (submitted)
9.
go back to reference Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Hirabayashi K (2006) Randomized controlled study of 3 different types of hemoclips for hemostasis of bleeding canine acute gastric ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 64:768–773PubMedCrossRef Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Hirabayashi K (2006) Randomized controlled study of 3 different types of hemoclips for hemostasis of bleeding canine acute gastric ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 64:768–773PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maiss J, Dumser C, Zopf Y, Naegel A, Krauss N, Hochberger J, Matthes K, Hahn EG, Schwab D (2006) Hemodynamic efficacy of two endoscopic clip devices used in the treatment of bleeding vessels, tested in an experimental setting using the compact erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy (compact EASIE) training model. Endoscopy 38:575–580PubMedCrossRef Maiss J, Dumser C, Zopf Y, Naegel A, Krauss N, Hochberger J, Matthes K, Hahn EG, Schwab D (2006) Hemodynamic efficacy of two endoscopic clip devices used in the treatment of bleeding vessels, tested in an experimental setting using the compact erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy (compact EASIE) training model. Endoscopy 38:575–580PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shin C, Ko P, Magno S et al (2007) Comparative study of endoscopic clips: duration of attachment at the site of clip application. Gastrointest Endosc 66:757–761PubMedCrossRef Shin C, Ko P, Magno S et al (2007) Comparative study of endoscopic clips: duration of attachment at the site of clip application. Gastrointest Endosc 66:757–761PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kato M, Jung Y, Gromski MA, Chuttani R, Matthes K (2012) Prospective, randomized comparison of 3 different hemoclips for the treatment of acute upper GI hemorrhage in an established experimental setting. Gastrointest Endosc 75:3–10PubMedCrossRef Kato M, Jung Y, Gromski MA, Chuttani R, Matthes K (2012) Prospective, randomized comparison of 3 different hemoclips for the treatment of acute upper GI hemorrhage in an established experimental setting. Gastrointest Endosc 75:3–10PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ooka K, Shibuya M, Suzuki Y (1997) A comparative study of intracranial aneurysm clips: closing and opening forces and physical endurance. Neurosurgery 40:318–323PubMedCrossRef Ooka K, Shibuya M, Suzuki Y (1997) A comparative study of intracranial aneurysm clips: closing and opening forces and physical endurance. Neurosurgery 40:318–323PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nagatani T, Shibuya M, Ooka K, Suzuki Y, Takayasu M, Yoshida J (1998) Titanium aneurysm clips: mechanical characteristics and clinical trial. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 38(Suppl):39–44PubMedCrossRef Nagatani T, Shibuya M, Ooka K, Suzuki Y, Takayasu M, Yoshida J (1998) Titanium aneurysm clips: mechanical characteristics and clinical trial. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 38(Suppl):39–44PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Papadopoulos MC, Apok V, Mitchell FT, Turner DP, Gooding A, Norris J (2004) Endurance of aneurysm clips: mechanical endurance of Yaşargil and Spetzler titanium aneurysm clips. Neurosurgery 54:966–970PubMedCrossRef Papadopoulos MC, Apok V, Mitchell FT, Turner DP, Gooding A, Norris J (2004) Endurance of aneurysm clips: mechanical endurance of Yaşargil and Spetzler titanium aneurysm clips. Neurosurgery 54:966–970PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hsu TC (2006) Comparison of holding power of metal and absorbable hemostatic clips. Am J Surg 191:68–71PubMedCrossRef Hsu TC (2006) Comparison of holding power of metal and absorbable hemostatic clips. Am J Surg 191:68–71PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hepworth CC, Kadirkamanathan SS, Gong F, Swain CP (1998) A randomised controlled comparison of injection, thermal, and mechanical endoscopic methods of haemostasis on mesenteric vessels. Gut 42:462–469PubMedCrossRef Hepworth CC, Kadirkamanathan SS, Gong F, Swain CP (1998) A randomised controlled comparison of injection, thermal, and mechanical endoscopic methods of haemostasis on mesenteric vessels. Gut 42:462–469PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Benchtop testing and comparisons among three types of through-the-scope endoscopic clipping devices
Authors
Sumanth R. Daram
Shou-Jiang Tang
Ruonan Wu
S. D. Filip To
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2679-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2013 Go to the issue