Top

Published in:

01-05-2013

Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study

Authors: Jenneke T. H. Hamminga, H. Sijbrand Hofker, Paul M. A. Broens, Philip M. Kluin, Erik Heineman, Jan Willem Haveman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Background

Diagnostic laparoscopy is the ultimate diagnostic tool to evaluate the appendix. Still, according to the literature, this strategy results in a negative appendectomy rate of approximately 12–18 % and associated morbidity. Laparoscopic criteria for determining appendicitis are lacking. The goal of this study is to define clear and reliable criteria for appendicitis during diagnostic laparoscopy that eventually may safely reduce the negative appendectomy rate.

Methods

From December 2009 through April 2011, 134 patients were included and analysed in a single-centre prospective pilot study. Intraoperatively, the appendix was evaluated by the surgeon according to nine criteria for appendicitis. The operating surgeon decided whether it should be removed or not. Immediately after the operation the surgeon had to complete a questionnaire on nine criteria for appendicitis. All removed appendices were examined by a pathologist. In case the appendix was not removed, the clinical postoperative course was decisive for the (missed) presence of appendicitis.

Results

In 109 cases an inflamed appendix was removed; in 25 patients the appendix was normal, 3 of which had been removed. After univariate analysis and clinical judgement six variables were included in the Laparoscopic APPendicitis score (LAPP score). In this study, use of the LAPP score would have led to a positive predictive value of 99 % and a negative predictive value of 100 %.

Conclusions

This study presents the LAPP score. The LAPP score is an easily applicable score that can be used by surgeons to evaluate the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. The score has high positive and negative predictive value. The LAPP score needs to be validated in a multicentre validation study.

Bijnen CL, van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB et al (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20:215–219PubMedCrossRef

Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB, Kazemier G, Heij HA (2010) Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended. Werkgroep richtlijn Diagnostiek en behandeling van acute appendicitis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:A303

Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41PubMed

Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2,660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41:745–749PubMedCrossRef

Rosai J (2004) Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 9th edn. Mosby, Edinburgh

Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamschi R et al (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies. Surg Endosc 20:14–29PubMedCrossRef

Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W (2010) SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24:757–761PubMedCrossRef

van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P et al (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–254PubMedCrossRef

Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804; discussion 804

10.

van Dalen R, Bagshaw PF, Dobbs BR et al (2003) The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age. Surg Endosc 17:1311–1313PubMedCrossRef

11.

Moberg AC, Ahlberg G, Leijonmarck CE (1998) Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1,043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 164:833–840PubMedCrossRef

12.

Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, McKeon JG et al (2000) Should an appendix that looks “normal” be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 166:388–389PubMedCrossRef

13.

Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R et al (2000) Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kaselas C, Molinaro F, Lacreuse I et al (2009) Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 44:1581–1585PubMedCrossRef

15.

Leun TT, Dixon E, Gill M (2009) Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann Surg 250:51–53CrossRef

16.

Andersson RE (2001) Small bowel obstruction after appendectomy. Br J Surg 88:1387–1391PubMedCrossRef

17.

Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564PubMedCrossRef

18.

Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468PubMedCrossRef

19.

Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 154:789–796PubMed

20.

Collaborative SCOAP, Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563

21.

Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K et al (2008) Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: For whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 144:276–282PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY et al (2012) Low dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 366:1596–1605PubMedCrossRef

Title: Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study
Authors: Jenneke T. H. Hamminga
H. Sijbrand Hofker
Paul M. A. Broens
Philip M. Kluin
Erik Heineman
Jan Willem Haveman
Publication date: 01-05-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2634-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Instrument Failures for the da Vinci Surgical System: a Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database Study

RE: Consumer-based technology for distribution of surgical videos for objective evaluation

Optimizing working space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure

Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience

Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial