Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Review

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors: Lesley Uttley, Fiona Campbell, Michael Rhodes, Anna Cantrell, Heather Stegenga, Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Oesophageal resection is the main method of curative treatment for cancer of the oesophagus. Despite advances in surgical technology and postoperative care, the survival rate and prognosis of people undergoing oesophagectomy is still poor. The use of minimally invasive techniques in oesophageal surgery offers hope of reduced recovery time due to a reduction in surgical trauma. Although the first reports of thoracoscopy- and laparoscopy-assisted oesophagectomy emerged some 20 years ago, there is still no consensus that the outcomes are clearly superior to outcomes following conventional open surgery. Increasingly, some surgeons promote the use of minimally invasive techniques for oesophagectomy but questions remain over its safety and efficacy compared with open surgery.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to compare minimally invasive techniques for oesophagectomy to open surgery. The outcomes of interest for efficacy and safety included mortality, operative complications, recurrence, and quality of life.

Results

There were 28 included comparative studies. No randomised controlled studies (RCTs) were available and therefore the data need to be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion

Recommendations for future research are discussed. We argue that it is difficult to conduct an RCT for this procedure due to ethical considerations and suggest ways that future nonrandomised studies could be improved.
Literature
1.
2.
Hirst J, Smithers BM, Gotley DC et al (2010) Defining cure for esophageal cancer: analysis of actual 5-year survivors following esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18(6):1766–1774CrossRef
3.
4.
Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64(2):121–133PubMed
5.
Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Decaluwe H, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D et al (2009) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(1):13–20PubMedCrossRef
6.
Gemmill EH, McCulloch P (2007) Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 94(12):1461–1467PubMedCrossRef
7.
Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24(7):1621–1629PubMedCrossRef
8.
Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A et al (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55(11):3031–3040PubMedCrossRef
9.
Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, van HR (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64(2):135–146PubMed
10.
Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H (2006) Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc 20(11):1681–1686PubMedCrossRef
11.
Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245(2):232–240PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
Law S (2006) Minimally invasive techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(5):925–940PubMedCrossRef
14.
Santillan AA, Farma JM, Meredith KL et al (2008) Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 6(9):879–884
15.
Migliore M, Choong CK, Lim E, Goldsmith KA, Ritchie A, Wells FC (2007) A surgeon’s case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32(2):375–380PubMedCrossRef
16.
Biere M, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia J, van Berge Henegouwen A, Rosman C, Sosef MN, de Lange E, Bonjer H, Cuesta MA, van der Peet D (2011) Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 11:2PubMedCrossRef
17.
Smith BR, Hinojosa MW, Reavis KM et al (2008) Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon’s training: general vs. thoracic. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1907–1911PubMedCrossRef
18.
Boone J, Livestro DP, Elias SG et al (2009) International survey on esophageal cancer: part 1 surgical techniques. Dis Esophagus 22(3):195–202PubMedCrossRef
19.
Rajan PS, Vaithiswaran V, Rajapandian S et al (2010) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy for carcinoma oesophagus - approaches and options in a high volume tertiary centre. J Indian Med Assoc 108(10):642–644PubMed
20.
Fernando HC, Luketich JD (2004) Quality of life after esophageal surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 14(3):367–374PubMedCrossRef
21.
Parameswaran R, McNair A, Avery KN et al (2008) The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2372–2379PubMedCrossRef
22.
Bernabe KQ, Bolton JS, Richardson WS (2005) Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 19(3):334–337PubMedCrossRef
23.
Buess G, Kayser J, Manncke K, Walter DJ, Bessell JR, Becker HD (1997) Endoscopic microsurgical dissection of the esophagus. Int Surg 82(2):109–112PubMed
24.
Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Cojutti A, Benzoni E, Baracchini E, Bresadola F (2006) Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(2):63–67PubMedCrossRef
25.
Caputo M, Fumagalli Romario U, Bona S, Rosati R, Peracchia A (2005) Laparoscopic gastroplasty for esophagectomy. Rays 30(4):315–318PubMed
26.
Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Dis Esophagus 21(3):220–225PubMedCrossRef
27.
Hamouda AH, Forshaw MJ, Tsigritis K, Jones GE, Noorani AS, Rohatgi A et al (2010) Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center. Surg Endosc 24(4):865–869PubMedCrossRef
28.
Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, Namikawa T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M et al (2009) Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(4):617–621PubMedCrossRef
29.
Kunisaki C, Hatori S, Imada T, Akiyama H, Ono H, Otsuka Y et al (2004) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with a voice-controlled robot: the AESOP system. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14(6):323–327PubMedCrossRef
30.
Lata AL, Oaks T, Levine EA (2010) Initial experience with thorascopic assisted esophagectomy. Am Surg 76(7):735–740PubMed
31.
Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JEJ (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135(8):920–925PubMedCrossRef
32.
Shah NR, Meredith KL, Weber J et al (2009) Outcomes associated with open and minimally invasive approaches to esophageal cancer. Gastroenterology 136:A899
33.
Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90(1):108–113PubMedCrossRef
34.
Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S (2009) Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 33(9):1868–1875PubMedCrossRef
35.
Perry KA, Enestvedt CK, Pham T, Welker M, Jobe BA, Hunter JG et al (2009) Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg 144(7):679–684PubMedCrossRef
36.
Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC et al (2010) Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg 199(5):594–598PubMedCrossRef
37.
Rosati R, Fumagalli U, De Pascale S et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open gastroplasty in transthoracic esophagectomy have similar outcomes. Gastroenterology 136:A914
38.
Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn T (2010) Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 97(12):1845–1853PubMedCrossRef
39.
Saha AK, Sutton CD, Sue-Ling H, Dexter SP, Sarela AI (2009) Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 23(1):119–124PubMedCrossRef
40.
Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, Riegler FM, Kabon B, Fleischmann E et al (2010) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc 24(12):3044–3053PubMedCrossRef
41.
Schroder W, Holscher AH, Bludau M, Vallbohmer D, Bollschweiler E, Gutschow C (2010) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg 34(4):738–743PubMedCrossRef
42.
Shiriashi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T et al (2006) Risk analysis of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 81(3):1083–1089CrossRef
43.
Thomson IG, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM, O’Rourke P et al (2010) Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence. Ann Surg 252(2):281–291PubMedCrossRef
44.
van den Broek WT, Makay O, Berends FJ, Yuan JZ, Houdijk AP, Meijer S et al (2004) Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus. Surg Endosc 18(5):812–817PubMedCrossRef
45.
Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q (2010) Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Dis Esophagus 23(5):408–414PubMed
46.
Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK et al (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 87(3):911–919PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?
Authors
Lesley Uttley
Fiona Campbell
Michael Rhodes
Anna Cantrell
Heather Stegenga
Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2546-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon’s experiences and proposal of clinical application

OriginalPaper

Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing

Editorial

Benefit-risk paradigm for clinical trial design of obesity devices: FDA proposal

New Technology

EVA: Laparoscopic Instrument Tracking Based on Endoscopic Video Analysis for Psychomotor Skills Assessment

OriginalPaper

C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

OriginalPaper

Causes and prevention of laparoscopic ureter injuries: an analysis of 31 cases during laparoscopic hysterectomy in the Netherlands