Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Guidelines

Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

Authors: M. Eikermann, R. Siegel, I. Broeders, C. Dziri, A. Fingerhut, C. Gutt, T. Jaschinski, A. Nassar, A. M. Paganini, D. Pieper, E. Targarona, M. Schrewe, A. Shamiyeh, M. Strik, E. A. M. Neugebauer

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in Europe (and the world) and has become the standard procedure for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute cholecystitis in patients without specific contraindications. Bile duct injuries (BDI) are rare but serious complications that can occur during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prevention and management of BDI has given rise to a host of publications but very few recommendations, especially in Europe.

Methods

A systematic research of the literature was performed. An international expert panel was invited to appraise the current literature and to develop evidence-based recommendations. Statements and recommendations were drafted after a consensus development conference in May 2011, followed by presentation and discussion at the annual congress of the EAES held in Torino in June 2011. Finally, full guidelines were consented and adopted by the expert panel via e-mail and web conference.

Results

A total of 1,765 publications were identified through the systematic literature search and additional submission by panellists; 671 publications were selected as potentially relevant. Only 46 publications fulfilled minimal methodological criteria to support Clinical Practice Guidelines recommendations. Because the level of evidence was low for most of the studies, most statements or recommendations had to be based on consensus of opinion among the panel members. A total of 15 statements and recommendations were developed covering the following topics: classification of injuries, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and management of BDI.

Conclusions

Because BDI is a rare event, it is difficult to generate evidence for prevention, diagnosis, or the management of BDI from clinical studies. Nevertheless, the panel has formulated recommendations. Due to the currently limited evidence, a European registry should be considered to collect and analyze more valid data on BDI upon which recommendations can be based.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Guidelines CoSfDTCP, Medicine Io (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. The National Academies Press, Washington Guidelines CoSfDTCP, Medicine Io (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. The National Academies Press, Washington
2.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2009) The guidelines manual National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2009) The guidelines manual
3.
go back to reference Shea BJ, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter A, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Method 7:10 Shea BJ, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter A, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Method 7:10
4.
go back to reference Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells G, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry D, Boers M (2009) AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1013–1020PubMedCrossRef Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells G, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry D, Boers M (2009) AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1013–1020PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150PubMedCrossRef Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:141–150PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Bong JJ, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2010) Methods of cystic duct occlusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006807 Gurusamy KS, Bong JJ, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2010) Methods of cystic duct occlusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006807
7.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2008) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007196 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR (2008) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007196
9.
go back to reference Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD008318 Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD008318
10.
go back to reference Bahram M, Gaballa G (2010) The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in management of patients with gall stones. Int J Surg 8:342–345PubMedCrossRef Bahram M, Gaballa G (2010) The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in management of patients with gall stones. Int J Surg 8:342–345PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT (2008) Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:593–598PubMedCrossRef Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT (2008) Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:593–598PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Calik A, Topaloglu S, Topcu S, Turkyilmaz S, Kucuktulu U, Piskin B (2007) Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1578–1581PubMedCrossRef Calik A, Topaloglu S, Topcu S, Turkyilmaz S, Kucuktulu U, Piskin B (2007) Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1578–1581PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gupta A, Agarwal PN, Kant R, Malik V (2004) Evaluation of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 8:255–258PubMed Gupta A, Agarwal PN, Kant R, Malik V (2004) Evaluation of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 8:255–258PubMed
14.
go back to reference Harju J, Kokki H, Paakkonen M, Karjalainen K, Eskelinen M (2010) Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg 99:132–136PubMed Harju J, Kokki H, Paakkonen M, Karjalainen K, Eskelinen M (2010) Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg 99:132–136PubMed
15.
go back to reference Jarhult J (2005) Is preoperative evaluation of the biliary tree necessary in uncomplicated gallstone disease? Results of a randomized trial. Scand J Surg 94:31–33PubMed Jarhult J (2005) Is preoperative evaluation of the biliary tree necessary in uncomplicated gallstone disease? Results of a randomized trial. Scand J Surg 94:31–33PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kato K, Kasai S, Matsuda M, Onodera K, Kato J, Imai M, Mito M, Saito T (1996) A new technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy—retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 81 cases. Endoscopy 28:356–359PubMedCrossRef Kato K, Kasai S, Matsuda M, Onodera K, Kato J, Imai M, Mito M, Saito T (1996) A new technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy—retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 81 cases. Endoscopy 28:356–359PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, Chatzimavroudis G, Germanidis G, Zavos C, Pilpilidis I, Paikos D, Papaziogas B (2008) A comparative study of 10-Fr vs. 7-Fr straight plastic stents in the treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leak. Surg Endosc 22:101–106PubMedCrossRef Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, Chatzimavroudis G, Germanidis G, Zavos C, Pilpilidis I, Paikos D, Papaziogas B (2008) A comparative study of 10-Fr vs. 7-Fr straight plastic stents in the treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leak. Surg Endosc 22:101–106PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Khan OA, Balaji S, Branagan G, Bennett DH, Davies N (2011) Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:362–367PubMedCrossRef Khan OA, Balaji S, Branagan G, Bennett DH, Davies N (2011) Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:362–367PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P, Kivilaakso E (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P, Kivilaakso E (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11:358–362PubMed Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11:358–362PubMed
21.
go back to reference Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–372 discussion 372-373PubMedCrossRef Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–372 discussion 372-373PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409PubMedCrossRef Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749PubMedCrossRef Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sabharwal AJ, Minford EJ, Marson LP, Muir IM, Hill D, Auld CD (1998) Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study. Br J Surg 85:624–626PubMedCrossRef Sabharwal AJ, Minford EJ, Marson LP, Muir IM, Hill D, Auld CD (1998) Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study. Br J Surg 85:624–626PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Talwar N, Pusuluri R, Arora MP, Pawar M (2006) Randomized controlled trial of conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum versus gasless technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JK Sci 8:73–78 Talwar N, Pusuluri R, Arora MP, Pawar M (2006) Randomized controlled trial of conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum versus gasless technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JK Sci 8:73–78
27.
go back to reference Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Alkhaffaf B, Parkin E, Flook D (2011) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a common and potentially hazardous technique that can be avoided. Arch Surg 146:329–333PubMedCrossRef Alkhaffaf B, Parkin E, Flook D (2011) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a common and potentially hazardous technique that can be avoided. Arch Surg 146:329–333PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Amott D, Webb A, Tulloh B (2005) Prospective comparison of routine and selective operative cholangiography. ANZ J Surg 75:378–382PubMedCrossRef Amott D, Webb A, Tulloh B (2005) Prospective comparison of routine and selective operative cholangiography. ANZ J Surg 75:378–382PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Glattli A, Metzger A, Klaiber C, Seiler C, Maddern GJ, Baer HU (1994) Cholecystocholangiography vs cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective controlled trial. Surg Endosc 8:299–301PubMedCrossRef Glattli A, Metzger A, Klaiber C, Seiler C, Maddern GJ, Baer HU (1994) Cholecystocholangiography vs cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective controlled trial. Surg Endosc 8:299–301PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Huang SM, Hsiao KM, Pan H, Yao CC, Lai TJ, Chen LY, Wu CW, Lui WY (2011) Overcoming the difficulties in laparoscopic management of contracted gallbladders with gallstones: possible role of fundus-down approach. Surg Endosc 25:284–291PubMedCrossRef Huang SM, Hsiao KM, Pan H, Yao CC, Lai TJ, Chen LY, Wu CW, Lui WY (2011) Overcoming the difficulties in laparoscopic management of contracted gallbladders with gallstones: possible role of fundus-down approach. Surg Endosc 25:284–291PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc 17:442–451PubMedCrossRef Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc 17:442–451PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hussain A, Mahmood HK, Dulku K (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in a resource-limited setting: the first 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Yemen. JSLS 12:71–76PubMed Hussain A, Mahmood HK, Dulku K (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in a resource-limited setting: the first 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Yemen. JSLS 12:71–76PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kavlakoglu B, Pekcici R, Oral S (2010) Verification of clipless closure of cystic duct by harmonic scalpel. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:591–595PubMedCrossRef Kavlakoglu B, Pekcici R, Oral S (2010) Verification of clipless closure of cystic duct by harmonic scalpel. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:591–595PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kelley JE, Burrus RG, Burns RP, Graham LD, Chandler KE (1993) Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Am Surg 59:23–27PubMed Kelley JE, Burrus RG, Burns RP, Graham LD, Chandler KE (1993) Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Am Surg 59:23–27PubMed
36.
go back to reference Xu F, Xu CG, Xu DZ (2004) A new method of preventing bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 10:2916–2918PubMed Xu F, Xu CG, Xu DZ (2004) A new method of preventing bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 10:2916–2918PubMed
37.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Kurohiji T, Kakegawa T (1994) Evaluation of two training programs for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence of major complications. World J Surg 18:279–285 discussion 285PubMedCrossRef Yamashita Y, Kurohiji T, Kakegawa T (1994) Evaluation of two training programs for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence of major complications. World J Surg 18:279–285 discussion 285PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Burch JM (2001) Routine intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography with selective cholangiography reduces bile duct complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 193:272–280PubMedCrossRef Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Burch JM (2001) Routine intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography with selective cholangiography reduces bile duct complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 193:272–280PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Buanes T, Mjaland O, Waage A, Langeggen H, Holmboe J (1998) A population-based survey of biliary surgery in Norway. Relationship between patient volume and quality of surgical treatment. Surg Endosc 12:852–855PubMedCrossRef Buanes T, Mjaland O, Waage A, Langeggen H, Holmboe J (1998) A population-based survey of biliary surgery in Norway. Relationship between patient volume and quality of surgical treatment. Surg Endosc 12:852–855PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Buanes T, Waage A, Mjaland O, Solheim K (1996) Bile leak after cholecystectomy significance and treatment: results from the National Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry. Int Surg 81:276–279PubMed Buanes T, Waage A, Mjaland O, Solheim K (1996) Bile leak after cholecystectomy significance and treatment: results from the National Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry. Int Surg 81:276–279PubMed
41.
go back to reference Cagir B, Rangraj M, Maffuci L, Ostrander LE, Herz BL (1994) A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:89–100PubMedCrossRef Cagir B, Rangraj M, Maffuci L, Ostrander LE, Herz BL (1994) A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:89–100PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Carlson MA, Ludwig KA, Frantzides CT, Cattey RP, Henry LG, Walker AP, Schulte WJ, Wilson SD (1993) Routine or selective intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:27–33PubMedCrossRef Carlson MA, Ludwig KA, Frantzides CT, Cattey RP, Henry LG, Walker AP, Schulte WJ, Wilson SD (1993) Routine or selective intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:27–33PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Chau CH, Tang CN, Siu WT, Ha JP, Li MK (2002) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 8:394–399PubMed Chau CH, Tang CN, Siu WT, Ha JP, Li MK (2002) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 8:394–399PubMed
44.
go back to reference Costi R, Mazzeo A, Tartamella F, Manceau C, Vacher B, Valverde A (2010) Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a “laparoscopy-first” attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Surg Endosc 24:51–62PubMedCrossRef Costi R, Mazzeo A, Tartamella F, Manceau C, Vacher B, Valverde A (2010) Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a “laparoscopy-first” attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Surg Endosc 24:51–62PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference de Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG (2005) Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc 19:996–1001PubMedCrossRef de Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG (2005) Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc 19:996–1001PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229:449–457PubMedCrossRef Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229:449–457PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Zona S, Andreotti A, Saviano M (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic scalpel. JSLS 14:14–19PubMedCrossRef Gelmini R, Franzoni C, Zona S, Andreotti A, Saviano M (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with Harmonic scalpel. JSLS 14:14–19PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556PubMedCrossRef Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:868–874PubMedCrossRef Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:868–874PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:25–28PubMedCrossRef Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:25–28PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6PubMedCrossRef Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference AQUA (2011) Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH. German Hospital Quality Report 2010 AQUA (2011) Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH. German Hospital Quality Report 2010
53.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Karvonen J, Salminen P, Gronroos JM (2011) Bile duct injuries during open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era: alarming trends. Surg Endosc 25:2906–2910PubMedCrossRef Karvonen J, Salminen P, Gronroos JM (2011) Bile duct injuries during open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era: alarming trends. Surg Endosc 25:2906–2910PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Chuang KI, Corley D, Postlethwaite DA, Merchant M, Harris HW (2012) Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? Am J Surg 203:480–487PubMedCrossRef Chuang KI, Corley D, Postlethwaite DA, Merchant M, Harris HW (2012) Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? Am J Surg 203:480–487PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L (2011) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396PubMedCrossRef Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L (2011) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:385–387PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:385–387PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:604–611PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:604–611PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558 discussion 558-549PubMedCrossRef Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558 discussion 558-549PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Lekawa M, Shapiro SJ, Gordon LA, Rothbart J, Hiatt JR (1995) The laparoscopic learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:455–458PubMed Lekawa M, Shapiro SJ, Gordon LA, Rothbart J, Hiatt JR (1995) The laparoscopic learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:455–458PubMed
64.
go back to reference Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M (2012) Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 99:160–167PubMedCrossRef Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M (2012) Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 99:160–167PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JB, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461PubMedCrossRef Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JB, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Pfluke JM, Bowers SP (2011) Laparoscopic intraoperative biliary ultrasonography: findings during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:505–509PubMedCrossRef Pfluke JM, Bowers SP (2011) Laparoscopic intraoperative biliary ultrasonography: findings during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:505–509PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Hashimoto M, Matsuda M, Watanabe G (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonography for reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 57:706–709PubMed Hashimoto M, Matsuda M, Watanabe G (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonography for reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 57:706–709PubMed
68.
go back to reference Hublet A, Dili A, Lemaire J, Mansvelt B, Molle G, Bertrand C (2009) Laparoscopic ultrasonography as a good alternative to intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 109:312–316PubMed Hublet A, Dili A, Lemaire J, Mansvelt B, Molle G, Bertrand C (2009) Laparoscopic ultrasonography as a good alternative to intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 109:312–316PubMed
69.
go back to reference Machi J, Tateishi T, Oishi AJ, Furumoto NL, Oishi RH, Uchida S, Sigel B (1999) Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 188:360–367PubMedCrossRef Machi J, Tateishi T, Oishi AJ, Furumoto NL, Oishi RH, Uchida S, Sigel B (1999) Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 188:360–367PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Mantovani A, Schubert L, Ghelma F, Panzera M, Verga M, Spina GP (1996) Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10:622–627PubMedCrossRef Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Mantovani A, Schubert L, Ghelma F, Panzera M, Verga M, Spina GP (1996) Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10:622–627PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
Authors
M. Eikermann
R. Siegel
I. Broeders
C. Dziri
A. Fingerhut
C. Gutt
T. Jaschinski
A. Nassar
A. M. Paganini
D. Pieper
E. Targarona
M. Schrewe
A. Shamiyeh
M. Strik
E. A. M. Neugebauer
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2511-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012 Go to the issue