Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Technique

Randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of liver retraction in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Authors: Rajat Goel, Asim Shabbir, Chi-Ming Tai, Alvin Eng, Hung-Yen Lin, Su-Long Lee, Chih-Kun Huang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate differences between three methods of liver retraction during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass (LRYGB) and to compare novel liver retraction techniques with the traditional mechanical liver retractor in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

In this study, 60 obese patients (26 males and 34 females) who underwent LRYGB between January and July 2010 were randomized to one of three groups (20 in each): group 1 (Nathanson liver retractor), group 2 (liver suspension tape), and group 3 (V-shaped liver suspension technique [V-LIST]). Data regarding demographics (age, sex, body mass index); liver function test (LFT) just before surgery; postoperative results immediately, then 18 h, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery; operative data, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 2 were calculated and analyzed.

Results

The groups did not differ significantly in terms of preoperative LFT or operative data except that group 3 took significantly longer time for liver suspension than group 1 (p = 0.01) or group 2 (p = 0.03). The VAS score in group 2 was significantly lower on POD 1 than in group 1 (p = 0.04). Group 1 showed a significant rise in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at 18 h compared with group 2 (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively) and group 3 (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01), at 1 week compared with group 2 (p = 0.04 and 0.04), and in AST levels alone during the immediate postoperative compared with group 3 (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The Nathanson liver retractor causes more liver dysfunction than V-LIST or the liver suspension technique and causes more postoperative pain than the liver suspension technique. Both V-LIST and liver suspension tape have a short learning curve and implications for single-port surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Gelfand DV et al (2005) Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg 15:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Gelfand DV et al (2005) Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg 15:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pasenau J, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM et al (2000) Liver hematoma after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a case report and review of retraction injuries. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:178–181PubMed Pasenau J, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM et al (2000) Liver hematoma after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a case report and review of retraction injuries. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:178–181PubMed
3.
go back to reference Huang CK, Lo CH, Asim S et al (2011) A novel technique for liver retraction in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 21:676–679PubMedCrossRef Huang CK, Lo CH, Asim S et al (2011) A novel technique for liver retraction in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 21:676–679PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Huang CK, Lee YC, Hung CM et al (2008) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbidly obese Chinese patients: learning curve, advocacy, and complications. Obes Surg 18:776–781PubMedCrossRef Huang CK, Lee YC, Hung CM et al (2008) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbidly obese Chinese patients: learning curve, advocacy, and complications. Obes Surg 18:776–781PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Capizzi FD, Boschi S, Brulatti M et al (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable esophagogastric banding: preliminary results. Obes Surg 12:391–394PubMedCrossRef Capizzi FD, Boschi S, Brulatti M et al (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable esophagogastric banding: preliminary results. Obes Surg 12:391–394PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Teixeira J, McGill K, Koshy N et al (2010) Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of adjustable gastric band: a series of 22 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:41–45PubMedCrossRef Teixeira J, McGill K, Koshy N et al (2010) Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of adjustable gastric band: a series of 22 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:41–45PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yassa NA, Peters JH (1996) CT of focal hepatic injury due to surgical retractor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:599–602PubMed Yassa NA, Peters JH (1996) CT of focal hepatic injury due to surgical retractor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:599–602PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, Toh Y et al (2008) New technique for the retraction of the liver in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 22:2532–2534PubMedCrossRef Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, Toh Y et al (2008) New technique for the retraction of the liver in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 22:2532–2534PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference de la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP et al (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg 19:1707–1710PubMedCrossRef de la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP et al (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg 19:1707–1710PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Huang CK, Yao SF, Lo CH et al (2010) A novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 20:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef Huang CK, Yao SF, Lo CH et al (2010) A novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 20:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V (1998) Alterations in hepatic function during laparoscopic surgery: an experimental clinical study. Surg Endosc 12:968–972PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V (1998) Alterations in hepatic function during laparoscopic surgery: an experimental clinical study. Surg Endosc 12:968–972PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morris-Stiff G, Jones R, Mitchell S et al (2008) Retraction transaminitis: an inevitable but benign complication of laparoscopic fundoplication. World J Surg 32:2650–2654PubMedCrossRef Morris-Stiff G, Jones R, Mitchell S et al (2008) Retraction transaminitis: an inevitable but benign complication of laparoscopic fundoplication. World J Surg 32:2650–2654PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yassa NA, Peters JH (1996) CT of focal hepatic injury due to surgical retractor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:599–602PubMed Yassa NA, Peters JH (1996) CT of focal hepatic injury due to surgical retractor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:599–602PubMed
Metadata
Title
Randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of liver retraction in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Authors
Rajat Goel
Asim Shabbir
Chi-Ming Tai
Alvin Eng
Hung-Yen Lin
Su-Long Lee
Chih-Kun Huang
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2438-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013 Go to the issue