Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012

01-11-2012

Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Byron F. Santos, Ezra N. Teitelbaum, Fahd O. Arafat, Magdy P. Milad, Nathaniel J. Soper, Eric S. Hungness

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

A natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach offers the potential of reducing pain and convalescence after intra-abdominal operations. We present a single-institution series of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomies (TVC) and compare outcomes with patients undergoing standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Patients had an indication for elective cholecystectomy and met the following institutional review board-approved inclusion criteria: female gender, age >18 years, body mass index ≤35, ASA Classification I or II, and absence of acute cholecystitis. TVC was performed by using one or two transabdominal ports to enable gallbladder retraction and clip application. Dissection was performed with a flexible endoscope through a posterior colpotomy using instrumentation from the NOTES GEN1 Toolbox (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.).

Results

Seven patients underwent TVC and seven patients underwent LC. Operative times were significantly longer for TVC (162 vs. 68 min; p < 0.001). All procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, except for one patient in each group who were discharged on POD#1. Three minor (grade I) complications occurred: two in the LC group and one in the TVC group. TVC patients required less narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit (1 vs. 8 mg morphine equivalents; p = 0.02). Visual Analog Scale pain scores (scale 0–10) were less in the TVC group at 30 min (1 vs. 5; p = 0.02) and 60 min (2 vs. 5; p = 0.02). TVC pain scores also were lower on postoperative days 1, 4, and 7 (2, 1, 0 vs. 6, 3, 2), although only significantly on POD#1 (p = 0.01). SF-36 scores were similar at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

This series adds to the existing evidence that transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope for dissection is a technically feasible and safe procedure. TVC requires a longer operative time than LC but may result in less pain in the immediate postoperative period with patients subsequently requiring fewer narcotics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006231 Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006231
2.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001546 Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001546
3.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery, October 2005. Surg Endosc 20:329–333PubMedCrossRef Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery, October 2005. Surg Endosc 20:329–333PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G, Lacerda Oliveira A (2007) NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 14:279–283PubMedCrossRef Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G, Lacerda Oliveira A (2007) NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 14:279–283PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 826–827PubMedCrossRef Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 826–827PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forgione A, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in human beings: preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:345–351PubMedCrossRef Forgione A, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in human beings: preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:345–351PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H et al (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1092–1098PubMedCrossRef Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H et al (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1092–1098PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. “conventional” laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbeck Arch Surg 396:709–715CrossRef Kilian M, Raue W, Menenakos C, Wassersleben B, Hartmann J (2011) Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. “conventional” laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Langenbeck Arch Surg 396:709–715CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R et al (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Endoscopy 42:571–575PubMedCrossRef Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R et al (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Endoscopy 42:571–575PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A et al (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A et al (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Melzack R (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299PubMedCrossRef Melzack R (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Quirk FH, Heiman JR, Rosen RC, Laan E, Smith MD, Boolell M (2002) Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for clinical trials of female sexual dysfunction. J Womens Health Gender Based Med 11:277–289CrossRef Quirk FH, Heiman JR, Rosen RC, Laan E, Smith MD, Boolell M (2002) Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for clinical trials of female sexual dysfunction. J Womens Health Gender Based Med 11:277–289CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed
17.
go back to reference Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP et al (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery—NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 17:142–158PubMedCrossRef Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP et al (2010) International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery—NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov 17:142–158PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Sousa LH, de Sousa JA, de Sousa Filho LH et al (2009) Totally NOTES (T-NOTES) transvaginal cholecystectomy using two endoscopes: preliminary report. Surg Endosc 23:2550–2555PubMedCrossRef de Sousa LH, de Sousa JA, de Sousa Filho LH et al (2009) Totally NOTES (T-NOTES) transvaginal cholecystectomy using two endoscopes: preliminary report. Surg Endosc 23:2550–2555PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L et al (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249:908–912PubMedCrossRef Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L et al (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249:908–912PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH, Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®): a technical review. Surg Endosc 25:3135–3148PubMedCrossRef Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH, Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®): a technical review. Surg Endosc 25:3135–3148PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Niu J, Song W, Yan M et al (2011) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical results for a series of 43 cases in China. Surg Endosc 25:1281–1286PubMedCrossRef Niu J, Song W, Yan M et al (2011) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical results for a series of 43 cases in China. Surg Endosc 25:1281–1286PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2011) Surgical outcome and midterm follow-up after transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:101–106PubMedCrossRef Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G (2011) Surgical outcome and midterm follow-up after transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:101–106PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Byron F. Santos
Ezra N. Teitelbaum
Fahd O. Arafat
Magdy P. Milad
Nathaniel J. Soper
Eric S. Hungness
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2313-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2012 Go to the issue