Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012

01-05-2012

Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy

Authors: P. Valdastri, G. Ciuti, A. Verbeni, A. Menciassi, P. Dario, A. Arezzo, M. Morino

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite being considered the most effective method for colorectal cancer diagnosis, colonoscopy take-up as a mass-screening procedure is limited mainly due to invasiveness, patient discomfort, fear of pain, and the need for sedation. In an effort to mitigate some of the disadvantages associated with colonoscopy, this work provides a preliminary assessment of a novel endoscopic device consisting in a softly tethered capsule for painless colonoscopy under robotic magnetic steering.

Methods

The proposed platform consists of the endoscopic device, a robotic unit, and a control box. In contrast to the traditional insertion method (i.e., pushing from behind), a “front-wheel” propulsion approach is proposed. A compliant tether connecting the device to an external box is used to provide insufflation, passing a flexible operative tool, enabling lens cleaning, and operating the vision module. To assess the diagnostic and treatment ability of the platform, 12 users were asked to find and remove artificially implanted beads as polyp surrogates in an ex vivo model. In vivo testing consisted of a qualitative study of the platform in pigs, focusing on active locomotion, diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, safety, and usability.

Results

The mean percentage of beads identified by each user during ex vivo trials was 85 ± 11%. All the identified beads were removed successfully using the polypectomy loop. The mean completion time for accomplishing the entire procedure was 678 ± 179 s. No immediate mucosal damage, acute complications such as perforation, or delayed adverse consequences were observed following application of the proposed method in vivo.

Conclusions

Use of the proposed platform in ex vivo and preliminary animal studies indicates that it is safe and operates effectively in a manner similar to a standard colonoscope. These studies served to demonstrate the platform’s added advantages of reduced size, front-wheel drive strategy, and robotic control over locomotion and orientation.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Berg AO, Allan JD, Frame PS, Homer CJ, Johnson MS, Klein JD, Lieu TA, Mulrow CD, Orleans CT, Peipert JF, Pender NJ, Siu AL, Teutsch SM, Westhoff C, Woolf SH (2002) Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137(2):129–131 Berg AO, Allan JD, Frame PS, Homer CJ, Johnson MS, Klein JD, Lieu TA, Mulrow CD, Orleans CT, Peipert JF, Pender NJ, Siu AL, Teutsch SM, Westhoff C, Woolf SH (2002) Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137(2):129–131
4.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JMA, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2010) Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 375(9726):1624–1633PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JMA, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2010) Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 375(9726):1624–1633PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationaledupdate based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124:544–560PubMedCrossRef Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationaledupdate based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124:544–560PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Zubiaurre L, Cosme A, Muñoz C, Sánchez A, Martín C, Tito L, Piñol V, Castells A, Llor X, Xicola RM, Pons E, Clofent J, de Castro ML, Cuquerella J, Medina E, Gutierrez A, Arenas JI, Jover R (2007) Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 56:1714–1718PubMedCrossRef Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Zubiaurre L, Cosme A, Muñoz C, Sánchez A, Martín C, Tito L, Piñol V, Castells A, Llor X, Xicola RM, Pons E, Clofent J, de Castro ML, Cuquerella J, Medina E, Gutierrez A, Arenas JI, Jover R (2007) Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 56:1714–1718PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borda A, Muñoz-Navas M (2008) Colon capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 14:5265–5268PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Urien I, Carretero C, Borda A, Muñoz-Navas M (2008) Colon capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 14:5265–5268PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Loeve A, Breedveld P, Dankelman J (2010) Scopes too flexible and too stiff. IEEE Pulse 1(3):26–41PubMedCrossRef Loeve A, Breedveld P, Dankelman J (2010) Scopes too flexible and too stiff. IEEE Pulse 1(3):26–41PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eickhoff A, Van Dam J, Jakobs R, Kudis V, Hartmann D, Damian U, Weickert U, Schilling D, Riemann JF (2007) Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide endoscopy system): results of the first human clinical trial (“PACE study”). Am J Gastroenterol 102(2):261–266PubMedCrossRef Eickhoff A, Van Dam J, Jakobs R, Kudis V, Hartmann D, Damian U, Weickert U, Schilling D, Riemann JF (2007) Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide endoscopy system): results of the first human clinical trial (“PACE study”). Am J Gastroenterol 102(2):261–266PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, Kim JO, Ko BM, Hwangbo Y, Kim WH, Park DH, Lee SK, Park CH, Baek IH, Park DI, Park SJ, Ji JS, Jang BI, Jeen YT, Shin JE, Byeon JS, Eun CS, Han DS (2008) An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 67(4):683–689PubMedCrossRef Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, Kim JO, Ko BM, Hwangbo Y, Kim WH, Park DH, Lee SK, Park CH, Baek IH, Park DI, Park SJ, Ji JS, Jang BI, Jeen YT, Shin JE, Byeon JS, Eun CS, Han DS (2008) An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 67(4):683–689PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cruz-Correa M, Schultz K, Jagannath S, Harris M, Kantsevoy S, Bedine M, Kalloo A (2007) Performance characteristics and comparison of two fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 52(4):1009–1013 Cruz-Correa M, Schultz K, Jagannath S, Harris M, Kantsevoy S, Bedine M, Kalloo A (2007) Performance characteristics and comparison of two fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 52(4):1009–1013
12.
go back to reference Aschoff AJ, Ernst AS, Brambs HJ, Juchems MS (2008) CT colonography: an update. Eur Radiol 18(3):429–437PubMedCrossRef Aschoff AJ, Ernst AS, Brambs HJ, Juchems MS (2008) CT colonography: an update. Eur Radiol 18(3):429–437PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Achiam MP, Chabanova E, Løgager V, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J (2007) Implementation of MR colonography. Abdom Imag 32(4):457–462CrossRef Achiam MP, Chabanova E, Løgager V, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J (2007) Implementation of MR colonography. Abdom Imag 32(4):457–462CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A (2010) Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 16(43):5452–5456PubMedCrossRef Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A (2010) Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 16(43):5452–5456PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fritscher-Ravens A, Fox S, Swain CP, Milla P, Long G (2006) CathCam guide wire–directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38(3):209–213PubMedCrossRef Fritscher-Ravens A, Fox S, Swain CP, Milla P, Long G (2006) CathCam guide wire–directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38(3):209–213PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Arber N, Grinshpon R, Pfeffer J, Maor J, Bar–Meir S, Rex D (2007) Proof-of-concept study of the Aer-O-Scope omnidirectional colonoscopic viewing system in ex vivo and in vivo porcine models. Endoscopy 39(5):412–417PubMedCrossRef Arber N, Grinshpon R, Pfeffer J, Maor J, Bar–Meir S, Rex D (2007) Proof-of-concept study of the Aer-O-Scope omnidirectional colonoscopic viewing system in ex vivo and in vivo porcine models. Endoscopy 39(5):412–417PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, Metzger Y, Lachter J, Gal E, Sapoznikov B, Konikoff F, Leichtmann G, Fireman Z, Kopelman Y, Adler SN (2009) Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 41(12):1026–1031PubMedCrossRef Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, Metzger Y, Lachter J, Gal E, Sapoznikov B, Konikoff F, Leichtmann G, Fireman Z, Kopelman Y, Adler SN (2009) Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 41(12):1026–1031PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H, Wettschureck E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Hoepffner N,MD (2008) A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 67(7):1139–1145PubMedCrossRef Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H, Wettschureck E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Hoepffner N,MD (2008) A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 67(7):1139–1145PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Groth S, Rex DK, Rösch T, Hoepffner N (2011) High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1075–1080PubMedCrossRef Groth S, Rex DK, Rösch T, Hoepffner N (2011) High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1075–1080PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R, Segol O, Sloyer A, Cohen LB, Goldfarb-Albak S, Repici A (2008) Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68(4):701–710PubMedCrossRef Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R, Segol O, Sloyer A, Cohen LB, Goldfarb-Albak S, Repici A (2008) Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68(4):701–710PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Drew B, Ross AS, Gluck MN, Brandabur JJ, McCormick SE, Lin OS (2011) Spiral overtube–assisted colonoscopy after incomplete colonoscopy in the redundant colon. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):515–519CrossRef Drew B, Ross AS, Gluck MN, Brandabur JJ, McCormick SE, Lin OS (2011) Spiral overtube–assisted colonoscopy after incomplete colonoscopy in the redundant colon. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):515–519CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo S, Tajiri S (2010) Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 42(7):541–545PubMedCrossRef Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo S, Tajiri S (2010) Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 42(7):541–545PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Keller J, Fibbe K, Volke F, Gerber J, Mosse AC, Reimann-Zawadzki M, Rabinovitz E, Layer P, Schmitt D, Andresen V, Rosien U, Swain P (2011) Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 73(1):22–28PubMedCrossRef Keller J, Fibbe K, Volke F, Gerber J, Mosse AC, Reimann-Zawadzki M, Rabinovitz E, Layer P, Schmitt D, Andresen V, Rosien U, Swain P (2011) Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 73(1):22–28PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ciuti G, Donlin R, Valdastri P, Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Morino M, Dario P (2010) Preliminary validation of a novel robotic-controlled platform for capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 42(2):148–152PubMedCrossRef Ciuti G, Donlin R, Valdastri P, Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Morino M, Dario P (2010) Preliminary validation of a novel robotic-controlled platform for capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 42(2):148–152PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ciuti G, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2010) Robotic magnetic steering and locomotion of capsule endoscope for diagnostic and surgical endoluminal procedures. Robotica 28:199–207CrossRef Ciuti G, Valdastri P, Menciassi A, Dario P (2010) Robotic magnetic steering and locomotion of capsule endoscope for diagnostic and surgical endoluminal procedures. Robotica 28:199–207CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Valdastri P, Ciuti G, Lucarini G, Salerno M, Di Natali C, Verra M, Dario P, Morino M (2011) Experimental assessment of a novel robotically driven endoscopic capsule for colonoscopy: a comparative study. In: XVII meeting of European surgical association, Helsinki, Finland, 20–21 May 2011 Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Valdastri P, Ciuti G, Lucarini G, Salerno M, Di Natali C, Verra M, Dario P, Morino M (2011) Experimental assessment of a novel robotically driven endoscopic capsule for colonoscopy: a comparative study. In: XVII meeting of European surgical association, Helsinki, Finland, 20–21 May 2011
27.
go back to reference Metzger YC, Adler SM, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Koslowsky B, Bjarnason I (2009) Comparison of a new PillCam™ SB2 video capsule versus the standard PillCam™ SB for detection of small bowel disease. Rep Med Imag 2:7–11 Metzger YC, Adler SM, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Koslowsky B, Bjarnason I (2009) Comparison of a new PillCam SB2 video capsule versus the standard PillCam SB for detection of small bowel disease. Rep Med Imag 2:7–11
28.
go back to reference Modlin IM (2000) A brief history of endoscopy. MultiMed, Milan Modlin IM (2000) A brief history of endoscopy. MultiMed, Milan
29.
go back to reference Long G, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills T, Swain P (2006) The Cath-Cam: a new concept in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64(6):997–1001PubMedCrossRef Long G, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills T, Swain P (2006) The Cath-Cam: a new concept in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 64(6):997–1001PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy
Authors
P. Valdastri
G. Ciuti
A. Verbeni
A. Menciassi
P. Dario
A. Arezzo
M. Morino
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2054-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012 Go to the issue