Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2012

01-02-2012

Lobectomy for early-stage lung carcinoma: a cost analysis of full thoracoscopy versus posterolateral thoracotomy

Authors: Ricard Ramos, Cristina Masuet, Dominique Gossot

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Major pulmonary resections for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are increasingly being performed by thoracoscopy, but there are economic concerns related to the use of many disposable items and increased operative time. We evaluated and compared the costs of thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy.

Methods

Data from all patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009 were reviewed. Two hundred eighty-seven major pulmonary resections (269 lobectomies and 18 anatomic segmentectomies) for NSCLC were performed: 98 cases via a totally endoscopic approach (TS) and 189 via a classical posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT). Direct medical costs [hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, disposables, theatre time, laboratory, and radiology costs] were evaluated.

Results

Patient demographics were similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ in histology, pathologic stage, or type of lobectomy. There were no differences in postoperative complications or readmissions during the 30-day postoperative period; however, patients in the TS group had significantly fewer chest tube days and shorter hospital length of stay (p < 0.001). Theatre costs were significantly higher in the TS group [€2,861 ± 458 vs. €2,260 ± 399 (p < 0.001)]. Mean cost for disposables for TS was €1,800 ± 560.46 vs. €901 ± 328 for PLT (p < 0.001). Thoracoscopic upper-right lobectomy and anatomic segmentectomy were more expensive than other thoracoscopic lobectomies. Mean costs for hospital stay, laboratory, and radiological services for TS were less than for PLT (p < 0.001), although mean ICU stay was similar in both groups. Finally, overall costs were significantly greater for the PLT group (€14,145.57 ± 7,117.84) than for the TS group (€11,934.13 ± 6,690.25) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Thoracoscopic lobectomy was less expensive than open lobectomy for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Although thoracoscopic lobectomy has a higher initial cost, overall cost is less expensive due to a shorter hospital stay.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flores R, Park B, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk N, Bains M, Downey R, Rusch V (2009) Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:11–18PubMedCrossRef Flores R, Park B, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk N, Bains M, Downey R, Rusch V (2009) Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:11–18PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gopaldas R, Bakaeen F, Dao T, Walsh G, Swisher S, Chu D (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1563–1570PubMedCrossRef Gopaldas R, Bakaeen F, Dao T, Walsh G, Swisher S, Chu D (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1563–1570PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McKenna R, Mahtabifard A, Pickens A, Kusuanco D, Fuller C (2007) Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1663–1667PubMedCrossRef McKenna R, Mahtabifard A, Pickens A, Kusuanco D, Fuller C (2007) Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1663–1667PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Onaitis M, Petersen R, Balderson S, Toloza E, Burfeind W, Harpole D, D’Amico T (2006) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:420–425PubMed Onaitis M, Petersen R, Balderson S, Toloza E, Burfeind W, Harpole D, D’Amico T (2006) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:420–425PubMed
5.
go back to reference Paul S, Altorki N, Sheng S, Lee P, Harpole D, Onaitis M, Stiles B, Port J, D’Amico T (2010) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:366–378PubMedCrossRef Paul S, Altorki N, Sheng S, Lee P, Harpole D, Onaitis M, Stiles B, Port J, D’Amico T (2010) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:366–378PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petersen RP, Pham D, Burfeind WR, Hanish SI, Toloza EM, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico T (2007) Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83(4):1245–1249PubMedCrossRef Petersen RP, Pham D, Burfeind WR, Hanish SI, Toloza EM, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico T (2007) Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83(4):1245–1249PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamamoto K, Ohsumi A, Kojima F, Imanishi N, Matsuoka K, Ueda M, Miyamoto Y (2010) Long-term survival after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 89:353–359PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto K, Ohsumi A, Kojima F, Imanishi N, Matsuoka K, Ueda M, Miyamoto Y (2010) Long-term survival after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 89:353–359PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yan T, Black D, Bannon P, McCaughan B (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562PubMedCrossRef Yan T, Black D, Bannon P, McCaughan B (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Casali G, Walker WS (2009) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: can we afford it? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(3):423–428PubMedCrossRef Casali G, Walker WS (2009) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: can we afford it? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(3):423–428PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shigemura N, Akashi A, Funaki S, Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Sawabata N, Shiono H, Minami M, Takeuchi Y, Okumura M, Sawa Y (2006) Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage 1A lung cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:507–512PubMedCrossRef Shigemura N, Akashi A, Funaki S, Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Sawabata N, Shiono H, Minami M, Takeuchi Y, Okumura M, Sawa Y (2006) Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage 1A lung cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:507–512PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gossot D (2008) Technical tricks to facilitate totally endoscopic major pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 86:323–326PubMedCrossRef Gossot D (2008) Technical tricks to facilitate totally endoscopic major pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 86:323–326PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sakuragi T, Okazaki Y, Mitsuoka M, Yamasaki F, Masuda M, Mori D, Satoh T, Itoh T (2008) The utility of a reusable bipolar sealing instrument, BiClamp®, for pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothor Surg 34:505–509CrossRef Sakuragi T, Okazaki Y, Mitsuoka M, Yamasaki F, Masuda M, Mori D, Satoh T, Itoh T (2008) The utility of a reusable bipolar sealing instrument, BiClamp®, for pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothor Surg 34:505–509CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsunezuka Y, Waseda R, Yachi T (2010) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device LigaSureV™ for pulmonary artery ligation—burst pressure and clinical experiences in complete video-assisted thoracoscopic major lung resection for lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:229–233PubMedCrossRef Tsunezuka Y, Waseda R, Yachi T (2010) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device LigaSureV™ for pulmonary artery ligation—burst pressure and clinical experiences in complete video-assisted thoracoscopic major lung resection for lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:229–233PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Scott W, Howington J, Feigenberg S, Movsas B, Pisters K (2007) Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd ed). Chest 132:234–242CrossRef Scott W, Howington J, Feigenberg S, Movsas B, Pisters K (2007) Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd ed). Chest 132:234–242CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Burfeind WR Jr, Jaik NP, Villamizar N, Toloza EM, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA (2009) A cost-minimisation analysis of lobectomy: thoracoscopic versus posterolateral thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef Burfeind WR Jr, Jaik NP, Villamizar N, Toloza EM, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA (2009) A cost-minimisation analysis of lobectomy: thoracoscopic versus posterolateral thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nakajima J, Takamoto S, Kohno T, Ohtsuka T (2000) Costs of videothoracoscopic surgery versus open resection for patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer 89:2497–2501PubMedCrossRef Nakajima J, Takamoto S, Kohno T, Ohtsuka T (2000) Costs of videothoracoscopic surgery versus open resection for patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer 89:2497–2501PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shigemura N, Akashi A, Nakagiri T, Ohta M, Matsuda H (2004) Complete vs assisted thoracoscopic approach: a prospective randomized trial comparing a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques. Surg Endosc 18:1492–1497PubMedCrossRef Shigemura N, Akashi A, Nakagiri T, Ohta M, Matsuda H (2004) Complete vs assisted thoracoscopic approach: a prospective randomized trial comparing a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques. Surg Endosc 18:1492–1497PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cho S, Do Y, Lee EB (2011) Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Endosc 25:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef Cho S, Do Y, Lee EB (2011) Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Endosc 25:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lobectomy for early-stage lung carcinoma: a cost analysis of full thoracoscopy versus posterolateral thoracotomy
Authors
Ricard Ramos
Cristina Masuet
Dominique Gossot
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1891-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2012 Go to the issue