Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Review

Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease

Authors: Sarah S. K. Tang, Dominique J. Twelves, Clare M. Isacke, Gerald P. H. Gui

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The majority of benign and malignant lesions of the breast are thought to arise from the epithelium of the terminal duct-lobular unit (TDLU). Although modern mammography, ultrasound, and MRI have improved diagnosis, a final pathological diagnosis currently relies on percutaneous methods of sampling breast lesions. The advantage of mammary ductoscopy (MD) is that it is possible to gain direct access to the ductal system via the nipple. Direct visualization of the duct epithelium allows the operator to precisely locate intraductal lesions, enabling accurate tissue sampling and providing guidance to the surgeon during excision. The intraductal approach may also have a role in screening individuals who are at high risk of breast cancer. Finally, in spontaneous nipple discharge (SND), as biopsy instruments improve and intraductal therapeutics, such as intraductal excision and laser ablation, become a possibility, normal or benign ductoscopic findings may help minimize surgery in selected patients. As MD technology is rapidly advancing, a comprehensive review of current practice will be a valuable guide for clinicians involved in the management of breast disease.

Methods

This is a review of current ductoscopic practice based on an exhaustive literature search of Pubmed, Google Scholar, and conference proceedings. The search terms “ductoscopy”, “duct endoscopy”, “mammary”, “breast,” and “intraductal” were used.

Results/conclusions

Duct endoscopes have become smaller in diameter with working channels and improved optical definition. Currently, the role of MD is best defined in the management of SND facilitating targeted surgical excision, potentially avoiding unnecessary surgery, and limiting the extent of surgical resection for benign disease. The role of MD in breast-cancer screening and breast conservation surgery has yet to be fully defined. Few prospective randomized trials exist in the literature, and these would be crucial to validate current opinion, not only in the benign setting but also in breast oncologic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dooley W, Francescatti D, Clark L, Webber G (2004) Office-based breast ductoscopy for diagnosis. Am J Surg 188:415–418PubMedCrossRef Dooley W, Francescatti D, Clark L, Webber G (2004) Office-based breast ductoscopy for diagnosis. Am J Surg 188:415–418PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Denewer A, El-Etribi K, Nada N, El-Metwally M (2008) The role and limitations of mammary ductoscopy in management of pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 14:442–449PubMedCrossRef Denewer A, El-Etribi K, Nada N, El-Metwally M (2008) The role and limitations of mammary ductoscopy in management of pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J 14:442–449PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Cohen J-M, Boolbol SK (2008) Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2720–2727PubMedCrossRef Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Cohen J-M, Boolbol SK (2008) Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2720–2727PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Escobar PF, Baynes D, Crowe JP (2004) Ductoscopy-assisted microdochectomy. J Fertil Women Med 49:222–224 Escobar PF, Baynes D, Crowe JP (2004) Ductoscopy-assisted microdochectomy. J Fertil Women Med 49:222–224
5.
go back to reference Dooley WC (2002) Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 9:920–923PubMedCrossRef Dooley WC (2002) Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 9:920–923PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, Ikenaga M, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Sakamoto G (2002) Endoscopic classification of intraductal lesions and histological diagnosis. Breast Cancer 9:220–225PubMedCrossRef Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, Ikenaga M, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Sakamoto G (2002) Endoscopic classification of intraductal lesions and histological diagnosis. Breast Cancer 9:220–225PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, Satoh H, Watanabe Y, Mikami T, Toda K, Okazaki Y, Nabeta K, Hirata K, Narimatsu E (1991) Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21:188–193PubMed Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, Satoh H, Watanabe Y, Mikami T, Toda K, Okazaki Y, Nabeta K, Hirata K, Narimatsu E (1991) Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21:188–193PubMed
8.
go back to reference Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Barsky SH, Shao ZM (2001) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc 15:1340–1345PubMedCrossRef Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Barsky SH, Shao ZM (2001) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc 15:1340–1345PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shen KW, Wu K, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Shao ZM, Barsky SH (2000) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 89:1512–1519PubMedCrossRef Shen KW, Wu K, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Shao ZM, Barsky SH (2000) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 89:1512–1519PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misak T, Hosokawa K, Fujii M, Kaise H, Kusama M, Koyanagi Y (2001) Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer 8:213–221PubMedCrossRef Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misak T, Hosokawa K, Fujii M, Kaise H, Kusama M, Koyanagi Y (2001) Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer 8:213–221PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz L, Staradub V, Morrow M, Khan S (2005) A Comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 241:575–581PubMedCrossRef Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz L, Staradub V, Morrow M, Khan S (2005) A Comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 241:575–581PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Louie LD, Crowe JP, Dawson AE, Lee K, Baynes DL, Dowdy A, Kim JA (2006) Indentification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy? Am J Surg 192:530–533PubMedCrossRef Louie LD, Crowe JP, Dawson AE, Lee K, Baynes DL, Dowdy A, Kim JA (2006) Indentification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy? Am J Surg 192:530–533PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jacobs VR, Paepke S, Schaaf H, Weber B-C, Kiechle-Bahat M (2007) Autofluorescence ductoscopy: a new imaging technique for intraductal breast endoscopy. Clin Breast Cancer 8:619–623CrossRef Jacobs VR, Paepke S, Schaaf H, Weber B-C, Kiechle-Bahat M (2007) Autofluorescence ductoscopy: a new imaging technique for intraductal breast endoscopy. Clin Breast Cancer 8:619–623CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khan SA, Baird C, Staradub VL, Morrow M (2002) Ductal lavage and ductoscopy: the opportunities and the limitations. Clin Breast Cancer 3:185–191PubMedCrossRef Khan SA, Baird C, Staradub VL, Morrow M (2002) Ductal lavage and ductoscopy: the opportunities and the limitations. Clin Breast Cancer 3:185–191PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, Naftalis E, Leitch Am, Hoover S, Euhus DM (2005) Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 103:1129–1136PubMedCrossRef Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, Naftalis E, Leitch Am, Hoover S, Euhus DM (2005) Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 103:1129–1136PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Matsunaga T, Kawakami R, Namba K, Fujii M (2004) Intraductal biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Cancer 39:863 Matsunaga T, Kawakami R, Namba K, Fujii M (2004) Intraductal biopsy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Cancer 39:863
17.
go back to reference Hunerbein M, Dubowy A, Raubach M, Gebauer B, Topalidis T, Schlag P (2007) Gradient index ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy of intraductal breast lesions. Am J Surg 194:511–514PubMedCrossRef Hunerbein M, Dubowy A, Raubach M, Gebauer B, Topalidis T, Schlag P (2007) Gradient index ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy of intraductal breast lesions. Am J Surg 194:511–514PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics (2008) Cancer Statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2005, England. Series MB1, no. 36, National Statistics, London Office for National Statistics (2008) Cancer Statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2005, England. Series MB1, no. 36, National Statistics, London
19.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33–38PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33–38PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lucassen A, Watson E, Eccles D (2001) Evidence-based case report: advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer. BMJ 322:1040–1042PubMedCrossRef Lucassen A, Watson E, Eccles D (2001) Evidence-based case report: advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer. BMJ 322:1040–1042PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Upton AC, Kelsey CA, Ashby RN, Rosenberg RD, Linver MN (1996) Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer 77:903–909PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Upton AC, Kelsey CA, Ashby RN, Rosenberg RD, Linver MN (1996) Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment. Cancer 77:903–909PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Feig SA, Hendrick RE (1997) Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:119–124PubMed Feig SA, Hendrick RE (1997) Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:119–124PubMed
23.
go back to reference Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, Prindiville SA, Palmieri D, Simon R, Reid T, Steeg PA (2006) Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 94:555–564PubMedCrossRef Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, Prindiville SA, Palmieri D, Simon R, Reid T, Steeg PA (2006) Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 94:555–564PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wood ME, Stanley MA, Crocker AM, Kingsley FS, Leiman G (2009) Ductal lavage of cancerous and unaffected breasts: procedure success rate and cancer detection. Acta Cytol 53:410–415PubMedCrossRef Wood ME, Stanley MA, Crocker AM, Kingsley FS, Leiman G (2009) Ductal lavage of cancerous and unaffected breasts: procedure success rate and cancer detection. Acta Cytol 53:410–415PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carruthers CD, Chapleskie LA, Flynn MB, Frazier TG (2007) The use of ductal lavage as a screening tool in women at high risk for developing breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 194:463–466PubMedCrossRef Carruthers CD, Chapleskie LA, Flynn MB, Frazier TG (2007) The use of ductal lavage as a screening tool in women at high risk for developing breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 194:463–466PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Khan SA, Lankes HA, Patil DB et al (2009) Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women. Cancer Prev Res 2:265–273CrossRef Khan SA, Lankes HA, Patil DB et al (2009) Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women. Cancer Prev Res 2:265–273CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Li J, Zhao J, Xiodong Y, Lange J, Kuere H, Krishnamurthy S, Schilling E, Khan SA, Sukuma S, Chan DW (2005) Identification of biomarkers for breast cancer in nipple aspiration and ductal lavage fluid. Clin Cancer Res 11:8312–8320PubMedCrossRef Li J, Zhao J, Xiodong Y, Lange J, Kuere H, Krishnamurthy S, Schilling E, Khan SA, Sukuma S, Chan DW (2005) Identification of biomarkers for breast cancer in nipple aspiration and ductal lavage fluid. Clin Cancer Res 11:8312–8320PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Hawke DH, Liu Y, Krishnamurthy S, Fritsche H, Hung KK, Kuerer HM (2006) Proteomic analysis of nipple aspirate fluid from women with early-stage breast cancer using isotope-coded affinity tags and tandem mass spectrometry reveals differential expression of vitamin D binding protein. BMC Cancer 6:68PubMedCrossRef Pawlik TM, Hawke DH, Liu Y, Krishnamurthy S, Fritsche H, Hung KK, Kuerer HM (2006) Proteomic analysis of nipple aspirate fluid from women with early-stage breast cancer using isotope-coded affinity tags and tandem mass spectrometry reveals differential expression of vitamin D binding protein. BMC Cancer 6:68PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fackler MJ, Rivers A, Teo WW, Mangat A, Taylor E, Zhang Z, Goodman S, Argani P, Nayar R, Susnik B, Sukuma S, Khan S (2009) Hypermethylated genes as biomarkers of cancer in women with pathological nipple discharge. Clin Cancer Res 15:3802–3811PubMedCrossRef Fackler MJ, Rivers A, Teo WW, Mangat A, Taylor E, Zhang Z, Goodman S, Argani P, Nayar R, Susnik B, Sukuma S, Khan S (2009) Hypermethylated genes as biomarkers of cancer in women with pathological nipple discharge. Clin Cancer Res 15:3802–3811PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zhu W, Qin W, Hewett JE, Sauter ER (2010) Quantitative evaluation of DNA hypermethylation in malignant and benign breast tissue and fluids. Int J Cancer 126:474–482PubMedCrossRef Zhu W, Qin W, Hewett JE, Sauter ER (2010) Quantitative evaluation of DNA hypermethylation in malignant and benign breast tissue and fluids. Int J Cancer 126:474–482PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fackler MJ, Malone J, Zhang Z, Schilling E, Garrett-Mayer E, Swift-Scanlan T, Lange J, Nayar R, Davidson NE, Khan SA, Sukumar S (2006) Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in ductal fluid. Clin Cancer Res 12:3306–3310PubMedCrossRef Fackler MJ, Malone J, Zhang Z, Schilling E, Garrett-Mayer E, Swift-Scanlan T, Lange J, Nayar R, Davidson NE, Khan SA, Sukumar S (2006) Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in ductal fluid. Clin Cancer Res 12:3306–3310PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Euhus DM, Bu D, Ashfaq R, Xie X-J, Beitch AM, Lewis CM (2006) Atypia and DNA methylation in nipple duct lavage in relation to predicted cancer risk. Can Epid Biom Prev 16:1812–1821 Euhus DM, Bu D, Ashfaq R, Xie X-J, Beitch AM, Lewis CM (2006) Atypia and DNA methylation in nipple duct lavage in relation to predicted cancer risk. Can Epid Biom Prev 16:1812–1821
33.
go back to reference Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2007) Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical applications. Br Cancer Res Treat 106:171–179CrossRef Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2007) Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical applications. Br Cancer Res Treat 106:171–179CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hou MF, Huang TJ, Liu GC (2001) The diagnostic value of galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Clin Imaging 25:75–81PubMedCrossRef Hou MF, Huang TJ, Liu GC (2001) The diagnostic value of galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Clin Imaging 25:75–81PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Baitchez G, Gortchev G, Todorova A, Dikov D, Stancheva N, Daskalova I (2003) Intraductal aspiration cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surg 88:83–86 Baitchez G, Gortchev G, Todorova A, Dikov D, Stancheva N, Daskalova I (2003) Intraductal aspiration cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surg 88:83–86
36.
go back to reference Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azavedo E (1999) Nipple discharge disorders: current diagnostic management and the role of fibre-ductoscopy. Eur Radiol 9:583–590PubMedCrossRef Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azavedo E (1999) Nipple discharge disorders: current diagnostic management and the role of fibre-ductoscopy. Eur Radiol 9:583–590PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Bender O, Balci F, Yuney E, Akbulut H (2009) Scarless endoscopic papillectomy of the breast. Onkologie 32:94–98PubMedCrossRef Bender O, Balci F, Yuney E, Akbulut H (2009) Scarless endoscopic papillectomy of the breast. Onkologie 32:94–98PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Dooley WC (2003) Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Onc 10:38–42CrossRef Dooley WC (2003) Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Onc 10:38–42CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease
Authors
Sarah S. K. Tang
Dominique J. Twelves
Clare M. Isacke
Gerald P. H. Gui
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1465-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2011 Go to the issue