Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2010

01-05-2010

Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: A RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis

Authors: Pablo Parra-Membrives, Daniel Díaz-Gómez, Román Vilegas-Portero, Máximo Molina-Linde, Lourdes Gómez-Bujedo, Juan Ramón Lacalle-Remigio

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bile duct stones affect 10% of patients who undergo a cholecystectomy and therefore represent a major health problem. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, endoscopic sphincterotomy, and open surgical choledocholithotomy are the three available methods for dealing with choledocholithiasis. Though many trials and reviews have compared all three strategies, a list of indications for defined patient profiles is lacking.

Methods

We employed the RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) to evaluate the three procedures for bile duct stone clearance. An expert panel judged appropriateness after a comprehensive bibliography review, a first-round private rating of 108 different clinical situations, a consensus meeting, and a second round of definitive rating. A list of indications for each procedure was statistically calculated.

Results

A consensus was reached for 41 indications (38%). The endoscopic approach was always appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed bile duct stones and inappropriate for patients with single intraoperative detected stones causing cholangitis and bile duct dilatation. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration was appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed choledocholithiasis if patients had not undergone a previous cholecystectomy and no signs of cholangitis were detected. The laparoscopic approach was also appropriate for intraoperatively incidentally detected stones, except for septic patients with poor performance status and multiple calculi. Laparoscopic bile duct clearance was judged inappropriate for septic patients with poor performance status and absence of bile duct dilatation. Open surgery was appropriate in all patients with intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis and in septic patients with bile duct dilatation. There was no clinical situation in which open surgery was appropriate when bile duct stones were preoperatively diagnosed.

Conclusions

There is still uncertainty with respect to the management of choledocholithiasis, showing the need for further investigation. The RAM helps to elucidate appropriateness for the different treatment options in specific clinical settings.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Verga M, Montorsi M (1999) Prevalence and laparoscopic ultrasound patterns of choledocholithiasis and biliary sludge during cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:129–134CrossRefPubMed Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Verga M, Montorsi M (1999) Prevalence and laparoscopic ultrasound patterns of choledocholithiasis and biliary sludge during cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:129–134CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33CrossRefPubMed Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference [No authors listed] (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH consensus development panel on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:271-279 [No authors listed] (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. NIH consensus development panel on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:271-279
5.
go back to reference Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003327 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003327
6.
go back to reference Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504CrossRefPubMed Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191CrossRefPubMed Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679CrossRefPubMed Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Kawai M, Ueno M, Yamaue H (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238:97–102CrossRefPubMed Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Kawai M, Ueno M, Yamaue H (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238:97–102CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H, Matsunaga H, Yokohata K, Takeda T, Utsunomiya N, Ikeda S (1998) Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 48:465–469CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H, Matsunaga H, Yokohata K, Takeda T, Utsunomiya N, Ikeda S (1998) Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 48:465–469CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Hoffmann W, Siewert JR, Classen M (1992) Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:745–749CrossRefPubMed Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Hoffmann W, Siewert JR, Classen M (1992) Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:745–749CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ, Cheadle WG, Miller FB (1993) The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:9–11CrossRefPubMed Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ, Cheadle WG, Miller FB (1993) The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:9–11CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stromberg C, Luo J, Enochsson L, Arnelo U, Nilsson M (2008) Endoscopic sphincterotomy and risk of malignancy in the bile ducts, liver, and pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed Stromberg C, Luo J, Enochsson L, Arnelo U, Nilsson M (2008) Endoscopic sphincterotomy and risk of malignancy in the bile ducts, liver, and pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15:4–13CrossRefPubMed Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 15:4–13CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Arbuckle J, Isla AM (2005) Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 75:35–38CrossRefPubMed Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Arbuckle J, Isla AM (2005) Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 75:35–38CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Poulose BK, Speroff T, Holzman MD (2007) Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Surg 142:43–48; discussion 49CrossRefPubMed Poulose BK, Speroff T, Holzman MD (2007) Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Surg 142:43–48; discussion 49CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34CrossRefPubMed Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Alhamdani A, Mahmud S, Jameel M, Baker A (2008) Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 22:2190–2195CrossRefPubMed Alhamdani A, Mahmud S, Jameel M, Baker A (2008) Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 22:2190–2195CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C, Jorgensen JO (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180CrossRefPubMed Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C, Jorgensen JO (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ (2008) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 78:492–494CrossRefPubMed Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ (2008) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 78:492–494CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Waage A, Stromberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Arvidsson D (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1181–1185CrossRefPubMed Waage A, Stromberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Arvidsson D (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1181–1185CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Poston GJ, Adam R, Alberts S, Curley S, Figueras J, Haller D, Kunstlinger F, Mentha G, Nordlinger B, Patt Y, Primrose J, Roh M, Rougier P, Ruers T, Schmoll HJ, Valls C, Vauthey NJ, Cornelis M, Kahan JP (2005) OncoSurge: a strategy for improving resectability with curative intent in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7125–7134CrossRefPubMed Poston GJ, Adam R, Alberts S, Curley S, Figueras J, Haller D, Kunstlinger F, Mentha G, Nordlinger B, Patt Y, Primrose J, Roh M, Rougier P, Ruers T, Schmoll HJ, Valls C, Vauthey NJ, Cornelis M, Kahan JP (2005) OncoSurge: a strategy for improving resectability with curative intent in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7125–7134CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983CrossRefPubMed Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wietlisbach V, Vader JP, Porchet F, Costanza MC, Burnand B (1999) Statistical approaches in the development of clinical practice guidelines from expert panels: the case of laminectomy in sciatica patients. Med Care 37:785–797CrossRefPubMed Wietlisbach V, Vader JP, Porchet F, Costanza MC, Burnand B (1999) Statistical approaches in the development of clinical practice guidelines from expert panels: the case of laminectomy in sciatica patients. Med Care 37:785–797CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH (1989) Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 79:445–447CrossRefPubMed Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH (1989) Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 79:445–447CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addisson-Wesley, Reading, MA Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addisson-Wesley, Reading, MA
28.
go back to reference Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lázaro P, van het Loo M, McDonnell J, Vader JP, Kahan JP (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness user’s manual. RAND, MR-1269-DG XII/RESISTANCE, Santa Monica, CA Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lázaro P, van het Loo M, McDonnell J, Vader JP, Kahan JP (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness user’s manual. RAND, MR-1269-DG XII/RESISTANCE, Santa Monica, CA
29.
go back to reference Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2:53–63CrossRefPubMed Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2:53–63CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bingener J, Schwesinger WH (2006) Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey. Surg Endosc 20:577–579CrossRefPubMed Bingener J, Schwesinger WH (2006) Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey. Surg Endosc 20:577–579CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR, Strodel WE 3rd (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary tract emergencies: state of the art. World J Surg 23:334–342CrossRefPubMed Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR, Strodel WE 3rd (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary tract emergencies: state of the art. World J Surg 23:334–342CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Verbesey JE, Birkett DH (2008) Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am 88:1315–1328 ixCrossRefPubMed Verbesey JE, Birkett DH (2008) Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am 88:1315–1328 ixCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: A RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis
Authors
Pablo Parra-Membrives
Daniel Díaz-Gómez
Román Vilegas-Portero
Máximo Molina-Linde
Lourdes Gómez-Bujedo
Juan Ramón Lacalle-Remigio
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0748-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2010 Go to the issue