Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2008

01-10-2008

One size does not fit all: current disposable laparoscopic devices do not fit the needs of female laparoscopic surgeons

Authors: Danielle M. Adams, Stephen J. Fenton, Bruce D. Schirmer, David M. Mahvi, Karen Horvath, Peter Nichol

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

An increasing number of women are entering the field of general surgery. Because surgical devices have traditionally been targeted at men, we hypothesized that, due to smaller hand size, female general surgery residents would have significantly more difficulty utilizing the “one size fits all” handles of disposable laparoscopic (lap) devices when compared with male residents.

Methods

General surgery residents were anonymously surveyed at four university general surgery training programs. Participants were asked to describe their use of four disposable lap instruments: the lap stapler, lap Harmonic scalpel® (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, New Jersey), lap LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado), and lap retrieval bag. Data were tabulated and analyzed, comparing male with female residents for each instrument as well as according to glove size.

Results

A total of 120 residents were asked to participate with 65 anonymous responses (28 women and 37 men). Women’s median glove size was significantly smaller than men’s (6.5 vs. 7.5, p < 0.0001), whereas the clinical year and number of lap cases were not significantly different. Women reported the following devices more awkward than their male counterparts: lap stapler, lap Harmonic scalpel®, and the lap LigaSure™. Women were more likely to use two hands and describe these devices as “always awkward.” When results were analyzed by glove size independently of gender we found that, with increasing glove size, residents were more likely to describe these devices as easy to use and used these devices with only one hand.

Conclusions

Current disposable lap devices are not designed for individuals with small hands. Women have significantly smaller hands than their male counterparts and have difficulty with the “one size fits all” lap device handles. With the increasing number of women entering general surgery programs, this problem will likely persist until devices are designed for surgeons with small hand sizes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Madan AK, Frantzides CT (2007) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trainers for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Surg Endosc 21:209–213PubMedCrossRef Madan AK, Frantzides CT (2007) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trainers for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Surg Endosc 21:209–213PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:1082–1085PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:1082–1085PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Park WC et al (2005) Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills. Surg Endosc 19:101–104PubMedCrossRef Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Park WC et al (2005) Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills. Surg Endosc 19:101–104PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rosser JC Jr, Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L et al (2007) The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 142:181–186; discussion 186PubMedCrossRef Rosser JC Jr, Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L et al (2007) The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 142:181–186; discussion 186PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD (2003) A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg 138:967–970PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD (2003) A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg 138:967–970PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berguer R, Hreljac A (2004) The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 18:508–512PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Hreljac A (2004) The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 18:508–512PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference AMA (2004–2005) Women in US Academic Medicine: Statistics and Medical School Benchmarking. AAMC GME Track (2004 data) AMA (2004–2005) Women in US Academic Medicine: Statistics and Medical School Benchmarking. AAMC GME Track (2004 data)
Metadata
Title
One size does not fit all: current disposable laparoscopic devices do not fit the needs of female laparoscopic surgeons
Authors
Danielle M. Adams
Stephen J. Fenton
Bruce D. Schirmer
David M. Mahvi
Karen Horvath
Peter Nichol
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9986-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2008 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices