Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009

Open Access 01-10-2009

Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality

Authors: Sanne M. B. I. Botden, I. H. J. T. de Hingh, J. J. Jakimowicz

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To be an effective training tool, a laparoscopic simulator has to provide metrics that are meaningful and informative to the trainee. Time, path length and smoothness are often used parameters, but are not very informative on the quality of the performance. This study aims to validate a newly developed assessment method for laparoscopic suturing on the ProMIS augmented reality simulator, and compares it with scores of objective observers.

Methods

Twenty-four participants practised their suturing skills on the augmented reality suturing module: experienced participants (n = 10), >50 clinical laparoscopic suturing experience; and novice participants (n = 14), without laparoscopic experience. The performances were recorded and assessed by two unrelated observers and compared with the assessment scores. The assessment score was a calculation of time spent in the correct area and quality (strength) of the knot. To test the accuracy of the individual assessment parameters, we compared these with each other.

Results

The experienced participants had significantly higher performance scores than the novice participants in the beginner-level mode (mean 95.73 vs. 60.89, standard deviation 2.63 vs. 17.09, < 0.001, independent t-test). The performance scores of the assessment method (n = 43) correlated significantly with the scorings of the objective observers (Spearman’s rho 0.672; p < 0.001).
The parameter time spent in correct area had a calculated significant correlation with the strength of the knot (n = 229, Spearman’s rho 0.257, p < 0.001), but this was clinically irrelevant.

Conclusion

This assessment method is a valid tool for objectively assessing laparoscopic suturing skills. Although assessment parameters can correlate, to provide informative feedback it is important to combine meaningful measurements in the assessment of suturing skills.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244(2):310–314CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244(2):310–314CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Satava RM (2006) Assessing surgery skills through simulation. Clin Teach 3:107–111CrossRef Satava RM (2006) Assessing surgery skills through simulation. Clin Teach 3:107–111CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150CrossRefPubMed Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463; discussion 463–464 Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463; discussion 463–464
5.
go back to reference Van Sickle KR (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231CrossRefPubMed Van Sickle KR (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Strom P, Hedman L, Sarna L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2006) Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc 20(9):1383–1388CrossRefPubMed Strom P, Hedman L, Sarna L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2006) Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc 20(9):1383–1388CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21(2):238–243CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21(2):238–243CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hammond I, Karthigasu K (2006) Training, assessment and competency in gynaecologic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20(1):173–187CrossRefPubMed Hammond I, Karthigasu K (2006) Training, assessment and competency in gynaecologic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20(1):173–187CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Objective assessment of endoscopic Knot Quality. Am J Surg 174:410–413CrossRefPubMed Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (1997) Objective assessment of endoscopic Knot Quality. Am J Surg 174:410–413CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2005) Real-time objective assessment of knot quality with a portable tensiometer is superior to execution time for assessment of laparoscopic knot-tying performance. Surg Innov 12(3):233–237CrossRefPubMed Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2005) Real-time objective assessment of knot quality with a portable tensiometer is superior to execution time for assessment of laparoscopic knot-tying performance. Surg Innov 12(3):233–237CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A (2007) Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 193:105–110CrossRefPubMed Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A (2007) Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 193:105–110CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 142(2):202–206CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 142(2):202–206CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19(12):1523–1532CrossRefPubMed Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19(12):1523–1532CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality
Authors
Sanne M. B. I. Botden
I. H. J. T. de Hingh
J. J. Jakimowicz
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0276-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices