Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2008

01-05-2008

Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004

Authors: Jason A. Kemp, Samuel R. G. Finlayson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Over the past 5 years, several studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colon resection is an acceptable and perhaps preferable alternative to open resection for both benign diseases and cancer. The extent to which laparoscopic colon resections are used nationally is not known.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify laparoscopic and open elective colon resections performed in the United States each year from 2000 through 2004. The trends in adoption of the laparoscopic technique for each type of colon resection and for the most common diagnoses were identified, and differences in patient and provider characteristics were examined.

Results

From 2000 to 2004, the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased from 3% to 6.5%. The proportion performed for cancer increased from 1.4% to 4.3%, and for benign disease from 4.6% to 8.2%. Patients treated laparoscopically tended to be younger (median age, 61 years vs 66 years; < 0.001) and to have fewer comorbidities (Charlson score of zero for 58.1% vs 37%; < 0.001). Laparoscopic colon resections were more widely adopted in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals (5.1% vs 3.7%; < 0.001) and in urban versus rural hospitals (4.7% vs 2.2%; < 0.001).

Conclusion

Although the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased in the first half of this decade, it has remained very low. This trend is similar across procedure types and diagnoses. It remains to be seen whether greater patient demand and more recent trials will result in wider adoption of the laparoscopic approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Vereja J, Goldstein H (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1:144–150 Jacobs M, Vereja J, Goldstein H (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1:144–150
2.
go back to reference Martel G, Boushey RP (2006) Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am 86:867–897PubMedCrossRef Martel G, Boushey RP (2006) Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am 86:867–897PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Alexander R, Jaques B, Mitchell K (1993) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 341:249–250PubMedCrossRef Alexander R, Jaques B, Mitchell K (1993) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 341:249–250PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–57PubMedCrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–57PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–767PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–767PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2059 The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2059
8.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SW, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SW, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference COLOR study group. (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef COLOR study group. (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG (1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1075–1079PubMedCrossRef Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG (1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1075–1079PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kemp JA, Zuckerman RS, Finlayson SR (2008) Trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural vs urban hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 206:28–32PubMedCrossRef Kemp JA, Zuckerman RS, Finlayson SR (2008) Trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural vs urban hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 206:28–32PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 17:864–867PubMedCrossRef Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 17:864–867PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tekkis P, Senaagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef Tekkis P, Senaagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378CrossRef Kincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004
Authors
Jason A. Kemp
Samuel R. G. Finlayson
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9732-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2008 Go to the issue