Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2008

01-04-2008

Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model

Authors: Theodore J. Cios, Kevin M. Reavis, David R. Renton, Jeffrey W. Hazey, Dean J. Mikami, Vimal K. Narula, Matthew T. Allemang, S. Scott Davis, W. Scott Melvin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The repair of gastric perforation commonly involves simple suture closure using an open or laparoscopic approach. An endolumenal approach using prosthetic materials may be beneficial. The role of bioprosthetics in this instance has not been thoroughly investigated, thus the authors evaluated the feasibility of gastric perforation repair using a bioabsorbable device and quantified gross and histological changes at the injury site. Twelve canines were anesthetized and underwent open gastrotomy. A 1-cm-diameter perforation was created in the anterior wall of the stomach and plugged with a bioabsorbable device. Intralumenal pH was recorded. Canines were sacrificed at one, four, six, eight, and 12 weeks. The stomach was explanted followed by gross and histological examination. The injury site was examined. The relative ability of the device to seal the perforation was recorded, as were postoperative changes. Tissue samples were analyzed for gross and microscopic tissue growth and compared to normal gastric tissue in the same animal as an internal control. A scoring system of −2 to +2 was used to measure injury site healing (−2= leak, −1= no leak and minimal ingrowth, 0= physiologic healing, +1= mild hypertrophic tissue, +2= severe hypertrophic tissue). In all canines, the bioprosthesis successfully sealed the perforation without leak under ex vivo insufflation. At one week, the device maintained its integrity but there was no tissue ingrowth. Histological healing score was −1. At 4–12 weeks, gross examination revealed a healed injury site in all animals. The lumenal portion of the plug was completely absorbed. The gross and histological healing score ranged from −1 to +1. The application of a bioabsorbable device results in durable closure of gastric perforation with physiologic healing of the injury site. This method of gastrotomy closure may aid in the evolution of advanced endoscopic approaches to perforation closure of hollow viscera.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M (2005) Management strategies, early results, benefits and risk factors of laparoscopic repairs of perforated ulcer. World J Surg 29:1299–1310PubMedCrossRef Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M (2005) Management strategies, early results, benefits and risk factors of laparoscopic repairs of perforated ulcer. World J Surg 29:1299–1310PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thompson AR, Hall TJ, Anglin BA, Scott-Conner CE (1995) Laparoscopic plication of perforated ulcer: Results of a selective approach. Southern Med J 88(2):185 Thompson AR, Hall TJ, Anglin BA, Scott-Conner CE (1995) Laparoscopic plication of perforated ulcer: Results of a selective approach. Southern Med J 88(2):185
3.
go back to reference Gluer S, Schmidt AI, Jesch NK, Ure BM (2006) Laparoscopic repair of neonatal gastric perforation. J Ped Surg 41:E57–E58CrossRef Gluer S, Schmidt AI, Jesch NK, Ure BM (2006) Laparoscopic repair of neonatal gastric perforation. J Ped Surg 41:E57–E58CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Mayer T, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery. Surg Endosc 19(11):1487–1490PubMedCrossRef Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Mayer T, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery. Surg Endosc 19(11):1487–1490PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee K, Chang H, Lo C (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am J Surg 70(4):352–6 Lee K, Chang H, Lo C (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am J Surg 70(4):352–6
6.
go back to reference de la Fuente SG, Gottfried MR, Lawson DC, et al. (2003) Evaluation of porcine-derived small intestine submucosa as a biodegradable graft for gastrointestinal healing. J Gastrointest Surg 7:96–101CrossRef de la Fuente SG, Gottfried MR, Lawson DC, et al. (2003) Evaluation of porcine-derived small intestine submucosa as a biodegradable graft for gastrointestinal healing. J Gastrointest Surg 7:96–101CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK, et al. (2004) Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 91:481–484PubMedCrossRef Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK, et al. (2004) Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 91:481–484PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ueno T, Oga A, Takahashi T, Pappas TN (2007) Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in the repair of a cecal wound in unprepared bowel in rats. J Gastrointest Surg 2007 May 3; [Epub ahead of print] Ueno T, Oga A, Takahashi T, Pappas TN (2007) Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in the repair of a cecal wound in unprepared bowel in rats. J Gastrointest Surg 2007 May 3; [Epub ahead of print]
9.
go back to reference Truong S, Bohm G, Klinge U, Stumpf M, Schumpelick V (2004) Results after endoscopic treatment of postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Surg Endosc 18:1105–1108PubMedCrossRef Truong S, Bohm G, Klinge U, Stumpf M, Schumpelick V (2004) Results after endoscopic treatment of postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Surg Endosc 18:1105–1108PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Disibeyaz S, Parlak E, Koksal AS, et al. (2005) Endoscopic treatment of a large upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leak using a prolene plug and cyanoacrylate. Endoscopy 37:1032–1033PubMedCrossRef Disibeyaz S, Parlak E, Koksal AS, et al. (2005) Endoscopic treatment of a large upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leak using a prolene plug and cyanoacrylate. Endoscopy 37:1032–1033PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Morales-Conde S, et al. (2005) Bioabsorbable vs polypropylene plug for the “mesh and plug” inguinal hernia repair. Poster presented at the American hernia society meeting in February 2005 (Gore Bioabsorbable Hernia Plug, manufacturer report) Morales-Conde S, et al. (2005) Bioabsorbable vs polypropylene plug for the “mesh and plug” inguinal hernia repair. Poster presented at the American hernia society meeting in February 2005 (Gore Bioabsorbable Hernia Plug, manufacturer report)
12.
go back to reference Krasner D (1997) Wound healing scale, version 1.0: a proposal. Adv Wound Care 10(5):82–85PubMed Krasner D (1997) Wound healing scale, version 1.0: a proposal. Adv Wound Care 10(5):82–85PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lucas C, Classen J, Harrison D, De H (2002) Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Adv Skin Wound Care 15(1):17–23PubMedCrossRef Lucas C, Classen J, Harrison D, De H (2002) Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Adv Skin Wound Care 15(1):17–23PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hashiba K, Carvalho AM, Diniz G Jr, et al. (2001) Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):500–504PubMedCrossRef Hashiba K, Carvalho AM, Diniz G Jr, et al. (2001) Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):500–504PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, et al. (2007) Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia 11(1):57–60PubMedCrossRef Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, et al. (2007) Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia 11(1):57–60PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smart N, Immanuel A, Mercer-Jones M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of a Littre’s hernia with porcine dermal collagen implant (Permacol). Hernia. Feb 9; [Epub ahead of print] Smart N, Immanuel A, Mercer-Jones M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of a Littre’s hernia with porcine dermal collagen implant (Permacol). Hernia. Feb 9; [Epub ahead of print]
17.
go back to reference Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193(3):360–363PubMedCrossRef Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193(3):360–363PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Esposito C, Damiano R, Settimi A, et al. (2004) Experience with the use of tissue adhesives in pediatric endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:290–292PubMedCrossRef Esposito C, Damiano R, Settimi A, et al. (2004) Experience with the use of tissue adhesives in pediatric endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:290–292PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Badylak SF, Record R, Lindberg K, Hodde J, Park K (1998) Small intestinal submucosa: a substrate for in vitro cell growth. J Biomater Sci Polym 9(8):863–878CrossRef Badylak SF, Record R, Lindberg K, Hodde J, Park K (1998) Small intestinal submucosa: a substrate for in vitro cell growth. J Biomater Sci Polym 9(8):863–878CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rosen M, Ponsky J, Petras R, et al. (2002) Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration. Surgery 132(3):480–486PubMedCrossRef Rosen M, Ponsky J, Petras R, et al. (2002) Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration. Surgery 132(3):480–486PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. (2001) In vivo degradation of a 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials 22(19):2653–2659PubMedCrossRef Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, et al. (2001) In vivo degradation of a 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials 22(19):2653–2659PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, et al. (1996) Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 60(1):107–114PubMedCrossRef Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, et al. (1996) Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 60(1):107–114PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Szostak MJ, DelPizzo JJ, Sklar GN (2000) The plug and patch: a new technique for repair of corporal perforation during the placement of penile prostheses. J Urol 163(4):1203–1205PubMedCrossRef Szostak MJ, DelPizzo JJ, Sklar GN (2000) The plug and patch: a new technique for repair of corporal perforation during the placement of penile prostheses. J Urol 163(4):1203–1205PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Whitson B (2001) Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res 99(2):282–287PubMedCrossRef Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Whitson B (2001) Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res 99(2):282–287PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fine NA, Mustoe TA (2006) Greenfield’s Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice 4th ed. Chapter 4. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Philadelphia, PA, USA Fine NA, Mustoe TA (2006) Greenfield’s Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice 4th ed. Chapter 4. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Philadelphia, PA, USA
26.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333PubMedCrossRef Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model
Authors
Theodore J. Cios
Kevin M. Reavis
David R. Renton
Jeffrey W. Hazey
Dean J. Mikami
Vimal K. Narula
Matthew T. Allemang
S. Scott Davis
W. Scott Melvin
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9530-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2008 Go to the issue