Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007

01-12-2007

Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens

Authors: Michelle A. Ostadi, Julie L. Harnish, Stacey Stegienko, David R. Urbach

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Staging of colorectal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes in a surgical specimen that are positive for metastatic cancer. It is generally recommended that a minimum of 12 lymph nodes be examined to ensure adequate staging. It is unclear which factors specifically contribute to variation in the number of lymph nodes retrieved from surgical specimens. This study aims to understand the factors affecting the number of lymph nodes identified in surgical colorectal cancer specimens.

Methods

A total of 264 retrospectively collected cases of colorectal cancer surgically treated at the University Health Network in Toronto from 2004 to 2006 were analyzed. We used univariate analyses of variance (ANOVA), and univariate and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses to study variation in the lymph node number associated with a variety of explanatory variables.

Results

The average number of lymph nodes retrieved per case was 18.1, with 70 (26.5%) cases containing fewer than 12. Variation in the lymph node number was greatest between different pathology assistants (p =  < 0.001). The mean number of nodes retrieved by different pathology assistants ranged from 12.6 to 29.7. On average, surgery for recurrent cancer removed 6.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.9, p = 0.02) fewer lymph nodes than for primary cancer. Each additional year of patient age was associated with retrieval of 0.1 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.2, p = 0.005) fewer nodes, and rectal cancer specimens had 2.7 (95% CI 0.04 to 5.4, p = 0.05) fewer lymph nodes than colon cancer specimens.

Conclusion

Most of the variation in the number of lymph nodes identified in surgical specimens from colorectal cancer operations was accounted for by differences between pathology assistants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Statistics, Canadian Cancer Society (2006) Colorectal Cancer Statistics, Canadian Cancer Society (2006)
2.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) Colon, rectum. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th Ed. Springer, New York, NY American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) Colon, rectum. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th Ed. Springer, New York, NY
3.
go back to reference Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D (2001), National Cancer Institute Expert Panel Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596CrossRefPubMed Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D (2001), National Cancer Institute Expert Panel Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cancer System Quality Index (2006) Cancer Care Ontario Cancer System Quality Index (2006) Cancer Care Ontario
5.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI (2003) Theprognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI (2003) Theprognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10:65–71CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB, Cummings B, Gunderson L, Macdonald JS, Mayer RJ (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:157–163PubMed Tepper JE, O’Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB, Cummings B, Gunderson L, Macdonald JS, Mayer RJ (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:157–163PubMed
7.
go back to reference Scott N, Thorne C, Jayne D (2004) Lymph node retrieval after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Pathology 57:335–336CrossRefPubMed Scott N, Thorne C, Jayne D (2004) Lymph node retrieval after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Pathology 57:335–336CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Galvis CO, Raab SS, D’Amico F, Grzybicki DM (2001) Pathologists’ assistants practice. A measure of performance. Am J Clin Pathol 116:816–822CrossRefPubMed Galvis CO, Raab SS, D’Amico F, Grzybicki DM (2001) Pathologists’ assistants practice. A measure of performance. Am J Clin Pathol 116:816–822CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Morris AM, Rothenberger DA, Tepper JE (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:426–431PubMed Baxter NN, Morris AM, Rothenberger DA, Tepper JE (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:426–431PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D, Simunovic M (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445CrossRefPubMed Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D, Simunovic M (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54CrossRefPubMed Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens
Authors
Michelle A. Ostadi
Julie L. Harnish
Stacey Stegienko
David R. Urbach
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9414-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007 Go to the issue

News & notices

News and Notices