Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2007

01-11-2007

Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system

Authors: J. H. Schneider, K. M. Kramer, A. Königsrainer, F. A. Granderath

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Currently, pH monitoring is the gold standard for assessing esophageal acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The shortcomings of 24-h pH-monitoring wires led to the development of a 48-h, catheter-free pH measurement system using the telemetry technique with the BRAVO capsule. This prospective study aimed to compare conventional 24-h pH monitoring with the BRAVO catheter-free pH-monitoring system in patients with GERD, patients after antireflux surgery, and a healthy control group.

Methods

A sample of 133 participants were enrolled in the current trial and divided into three subgroups. Group 1 consisted of 10 healthy volunteers. Group 2 consisted of 123 patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and endoscopic signs of esophagitis. Group 3 consisted of 43 GERD patients (extracted from group 2) who underwent a laparoscopic 360° “floppy” Nissen fundoplication. All the patients underwent both conventional 24-h pH monitoring and BRAVO catheter-free pH monitoring. The data for both methods were recorded and compared in line with the different patient groups regarding their validity and reliability. Additionally, all the patients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire concerning their subjective perception of the two different methods.

Results

Both the 24-h pH monitoring and the 48-h BRAVO catheter-free pH monitoring could be successfully performed for all the patients. During measurement, 122 of the patients (92%) continued working or performing daily activities. A significant difference could not be found regarding objective outcome between the two measurement methods in the three patient groups. The two methods showed comparable results in terms of data and measurement reliability. The validity also was comparable, with no significant differences within the groups. Concerning the patients’ subjective estimation of the two methods, the patients reported reduced regular activities and a higher level of discomfort during measurement with the conventional 24-h pH-monitoring system (p < 0.001 and p< 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Both conventional 24-h pH monitoring and the 48-h catheter-free pH monitoring are valid and reliable recording devices for measuring esophageal acid exposure. However, from the patients’ point of view, the BRAVO capsule affords less discomfort in the throat and allows more normal daily activities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anggiansah A, Sumboonnanondo K, Wang J, et al. (1993) Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeter above the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 88: 842–846PubMed Anggiansah A, Sumboonnanondo K, Wang J, et al. (1993) Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeter above the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 88: 842–846PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bremner RM, DeMeester TR, Stein H (1997) Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: what is normal. In: Richter JE (ed) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. 2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, New York, pp 77–94 Bremner RM, DeMeester TR, Stein H (1997) Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: what is normal. In: Richter JE (ed) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. 2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, New York, pp 77–94
3.
go back to reference Fass R, Hell RE, Sampliner, Pulliam G, Graver E, Harzt V, Johnson C, Jaffe PH (1999) Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 44: 2263–2269 Fass R, Hell RE, Sampliner, Pulliam G, Graver E, Harzt V, Johnson C, Jaffe PH (1999) Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 44: 2263–2269
4.
go back to reference Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2003) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: experience with 668 laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Int J Colorectal Dis 18: 73–74PubMedCrossRef Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2003) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: experience with 668 laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Int J Colorectal Dis 18: 73–74PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR (1992) Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 87: 1102–1111PubMed Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR (1992) Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 87: 1102–1111PubMed
6.
go back to reference Johnson LF, DeMeester TR (1974) Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62: 325–332PubMed Johnson LF, DeMeester TR (1974) Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62: 325–332PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kahrilas J, Lin S, Chen J, Manka M (1999) The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. Gut 44: 476–482PubMedCrossRef Kahrilas J, Lin S, Chen J, Manka M (1999) The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. Gut 44: 476–482PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM (1996) Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 110: 1982–1996PubMedCrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM (1996) Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 110: 1982–1996PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, Guardino JM, Chapman J, Kahrilas PJ (2003) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 740–749PubMedCrossRef Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, Guardino JM, Chapman J, Kahrilas PJ (2003) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 740–749PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR (1992) Normal 24-h ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH values: influence of study center, ph electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci 37: 849–856PubMedCrossRef Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR (1992) Normal 24-h ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH values: influence of study center, ph electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci 37: 849–856PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schneider JH, Crookes P, Becker HD (1999) Four-channel sleeve catheter for prolonged measurement of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Dig Dis Sci 12: 2456–2461CrossRef Schneider JH, Crookes P, Becker HD (1999) Four-channel sleeve catheter for prolonged measurement of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Dig Dis Sci 12: 2456–2461CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schneider JH, Grund KE, Becker HD (1998) Lower esophageal sphincter measurement in four different quadrants in normals and patients with achalasia. Dis Esophagus 11: 120–124PubMed Schneider JH, Grund KE, Becker HD (1998) Lower esophageal sphincter measurement in four different quadrants in normals and patients with achalasia. Dis Esophagus 11: 120–124PubMed
14.
go back to reference Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johannsson J, Oberg S (2005) Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and normal values in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 40: 768–774PubMedCrossRef Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johannsson J, Oberg S (2005) Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and normal values in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 40: 768–774PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Weusten BL, Akkermans LM, van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJ (1994) Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Physiol 266: G357–G362PubMed Weusten BL, Akkermans LM, van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJ (1994) Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Physiol 266: G357–G362PubMed
Metadata
Title
Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system
Authors
J. H. Schneider
K. M. Kramer
A. Königsrainer
F. A. Granderath
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9301-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2007 Go to the issue