Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007

01-04-2007

A comparison of 399 open and 568 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed during a 4-year period

Authors: N. Sekhar, A. Torquati, Y. Youssef, J. K. Wright, W. O. Richards

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) was introduced at the authors’ institution 5 years ago. The authors analyzed the short- and long-term results of this procedure compared with those for the same procedure using the laparotomy approach over the same period.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected bariatric database used the outcome end points used by the American Society of Bariatric Surgery (ASBS) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) in their center of excellence programs.

Results

From January 2001 to July 2005, 568 laparoscopic and 399 open gastric bypasses were performed at Vanderbilt University. The patients were from the same bariatric surgery program and therefore received the same pre- and postoperative care. The hospital length of stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter (2.5 ± 2.4 days) than in the open group (3.7 ± 3.7 days; p = 0.001). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (164 ± 50 min) than in the open group (195 ± 50 min; p = 0.0001). The follow-up assessment response at 2 years was 76.6%. At 2 years, the excess weight loss (EWL) was significantly greater in the laparoscopic group (71.3% ± 18.4%) than in the open group (67.3% ± 15.3%; p = 0.03). The wound infection rate was significantly higher in open group (9.2%) than in the laparoscopic group (1.7%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality: open (0.50%) versus laparoscopic (0.17%; p = 0.371). There was no significant difference in the 30-day reoperation rate between the open (2.4%) and laparoscopic (2.6%; p = 0.705) groups. The 30-day readmission rate was similar in the open (5.0%) and laparoscopic (5.2%; p = 0.852) groups, as was the rate of leakage from the gastrojejunostomy in the open (0.50%) and laparoscopic (0.35%; p = 0.127) groups. The conversion rate from laparoscopic procedure to laparotomy was 1.7%.

Conclusion

In the authors’ institution, a laparoscopic bariatric surgery program with a very low rate of morbidity and mortality has been introduced. Operative time, hospital stay, and wound complications are reduced with the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic and open procedures are equally safe, with equivalent 30-day mortality, readmission, reoperation, and gastrojejunostomy leakage rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Courcoulas A, Perry Y, Buenaventura P, Luketich J (2003) Comparing the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a matched paired analysis. Obes Surg 13: 341–346PubMedCrossRef Courcoulas A, Perry Y, Buenaventura P, Luketich J (2003) Comparing the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a matched paired analysis. Obes Surg 13: 341–346PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher BL (2004) Comparison of recovery time after open and laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable banding. Obes Surg 14: 67–72PubMedCrossRef Fisher BL (2004) Comparison of recovery time after open and laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable banding. Obes Surg 14: 67–72PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 291: 2847–2850PubMedCrossRef Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 291: 2847–2850PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Livingston EH (2004) Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 188: 105–110PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH (2004) Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 188: 105–110PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marema RT, Perez M, Buffington CK (2005) Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries. Surg Endosc 19: 525–530PubMedCrossRef Marema RT, Perez M, Buffington CK (2005) Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries. Surg Endosc 19: 525–530PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Fleming NW, Singh A, Lee SJ, Goldman CD, Wolfe BM (2001) Evaluation of core temperature during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11: 570–575PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Fleming NW, Singh A, Lee SJ, Goldman CD, Wolfe BM (2001) Evaluation of core temperature during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11: 570–575PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234: 279–289; discussion 289–291PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234: 279–289; discussion 289–291PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, Gosselin RC, Singh A, Wolfe BM (2002) Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 194: 557–566; discussion 566–567PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, Gosselin RC, Singh A, Wolfe BM (2002) Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 194: 557–566; discussion 566–567PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Palmer LS, Wolfe BM (2000) A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. J Am Coll Surg 191: 149–155; discussion 155–157PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Palmer LS, Wolfe BM (2000) A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. J Am Coll Surg 191: 149–155; discussion 155–157PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192: 469–476; discussion 476–477PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192: 469–476; discussion 476–477PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens CM, Nguyen NT (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3,464 cases. Arch Surg 138: 957–961PubMedCrossRef Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens CM, Nguyen NT (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3,464 cases. Arch Surg 138: 957–961PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg 243: 181–188PubMedCrossRef Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg 243: 181–188PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith SC, Edwards CB, Goodman GN, Halversen RC, Simper SC (2004) Open vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison of operative morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg 14: 73–76PubMedCrossRef Smith SC, Edwards CB, Goodman GN, Halversen RC, Simper SC (2004) Open vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison of operative morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg 14: 73–76PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Westling A, Gustavsson S (2001) Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg 11: 284–292PubMedCrossRef Westling A, Gustavsson S (2001) Laparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial. Obes Surg 11: 284–292PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A comparison of 399 open and 568 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed during a 4-year period
Authors
N. Sekhar
A. Torquati
Y. Youssef
J. K. Wright
W. O. Richards
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9151-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007 Go to the issue