Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006

01-09-2006

Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery

Authors: A. Mehrabi, C. L. Yetimoglu, A. Nickkholgh, A. Kashfi, P. Kienle, L. Konstantinides, M. R. Ahmadi, H. Fonouni, P. Schemmer, H. Friess, M. M. Gebhard, M. W. Büchler, J. Schmidt, C. N. Gutt

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the increasing use of the surgical robotic system in the clinical arena, appropriate training programs and assessment systems need to be established for mastery of this new technology. The authors aimed to design and evaluate a clinic-like training program for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.

Methods

Four trainees with different surgical levels of experience participated in this study using the da Vinci telemanipulator. Each participant started with an initial evaluation stage composed of standardized visceral and vascular operations (cholecystectomy, gastrotomy, anastomosis of the small intestine, and anastomosis of the aorta) in a porcine model. Then the participants went on to the training stage with the rat model, performing standardized visceral and vascular operations (gastrotomy, anastomosis of the large and small intestines, and anastomosis of the aorta) four times in four rats. The final evaluation stage was again identical to the initial stage. The operative times, the number of complications, and the performance quality of the participants were compared between the two evaluation stages to assess the impact of the training stage on the results.

Results

The operative times in the final evaluation stage were considerably shorter than in the initial evaluation stage and, except for cholecystectomies, all the differences reached statistical significance. Also, significantly fewer complications and improved quality for each operation in the final evaluation stage were documented, as compared with their counterparts in the initial evaluation stage. These improvements were recorded at each level of experience.

Conclusions

The presented experimental small and large animal model is a standardized and reproducible training method for robotic surgery that allows evaluation of the surgical performance while shortening and optimizing the learning-curve.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16: 1389–1402PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16: 1389–1402PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH, Kelley WE Jr (2002) Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 17–25PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH, Kelley WE Jr (2002) Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 17–25PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, Chevtchik O, Bonaros N, Ott H, Friedrich G, Weidinger F, Laufer G (2004) Robotic totally endoscopic CAB: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127: 504–510PubMedCrossRef Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, Chevtchik O, Bonaros N, Ott H, Friedrich G, Weidinger F, Laufer G (2004) Robotic totally endoscopic CAB: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127: 504–510PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boyd WD, Desai ND, Kiaii B, Rayman R, Menkis AH, McKenzie FN, Novick RJ (2000) A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis Ann Thorac Surg 70: 839–842, discussion 842–843PubMedCrossRef Boyd WD, Desai ND, Kiaii B, Rayman R, Menkis AH, McKenzie FN, Novick RJ (2000) A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis Ann Thorac Surg 70: 839–842, discussion 842–843PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Buess GF, Schurr MO, Fischer SC (2000) Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 135: 229–235PubMedCrossRef Buess GF, Schurr MO, Fischer SC (2000) Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 135: 229–235PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477PubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Fourtanier G (1999) Nissen fundoplication done by remotely controlled robotic technique. Ann Chir 53: 137–141PubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Fourtanier G (1999) Nissen fundoplication done by remotely controlled robotic technique. Ann Chir 53: 137–141PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F (1999) The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 9: 206–209PubMedCrossRef Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F (1999) The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 9: 206–209PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119PubMedCrossRef Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17: 574–579PubMedCrossRef Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17: 574–579PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Damiano RJ Jr, Tabaie HA, Mack MJ, Edgerton JR, Mullangi C, Graper WP, Prasad SM (2001) Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically-assisted CAB grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 1263–1268, discussion 1268–1269PubMedCrossRef Damiano RJ Jr, Tabaie HA, Mack MJ, Edgerton JR, Mullangi C, Graper WP, Prasad SM (2001) Initial prospective multicenter clinical trial of robotically-assisted CAB grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 1263–1268, discussion 1268–1269PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill: needs to become more objective. BMJ 318: 887–888PubMed Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill: needs to become more objective. BMJ 318: 887–888PubMed
14.
go back to reference Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74: 1020–1023PubMedCrossRef Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 74: 1020–1023PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14PubMedCrossRef Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Di Lorenzo N, Coscarella G, Faraci L, Konopacki D, Pietrantuono M, Gaspari AL (2005) Robotic systems and surgical education. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 9: 3–12PubMed Di Lorenzo N, Coscarella G, Faraci L, Konopacki D, Pietrantuono M, Gaspari AL (2005) Robotic systems and surgical education. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 9: 3–12PubMed
17.
go back to reference Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW (2000) Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 15: 378–387PubMedCrossRef Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW (2000) Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 15: 378–387PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, McGuigan J (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25: 1478–1483PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, McGuigan J (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25: 1478–1483PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) VR simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241: 364–372PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) VR simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241: 364–372PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, Buchler MW (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91: 1390–1397PubMedCrossRef Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, Buchler MW (2004) Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 91: 1390–1397PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, Schenkman NS (2004) Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system. Am J Surg 187: 309–315PubMedCrossRef Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, Schenkman NS (2004) Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system. Am J Surg 187: 309–315PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, Marohn MR, Talamini MA (2005) Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc 19: 477–483PubMedCrossRef Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, Marohn MR, Talamini MA (2005) Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc 19: 477–483PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hashizume M, Tsugawa K (2004) Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems, and future vision. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34: 227–237PubMedCrossRef Hashizume M, Tsugawa K (2004) Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems, and future vision. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34: 227–237PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of learning curve of a simulated surgical task on da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18: 372–378PubMedCrossRef Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of learning curve of a simulated surgical task on da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18: 372–378PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12: 1091PubMedCrossRef Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12: 1091PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hubert J, Feuillu B, Mangin P, Lobontiu A, Artis M, Villemot JP (2003) Laparoscopic computer-assisted pyeloplasty: the results of experimental surgery in pigs. BJU Int 92: 437–440PubMedCrossRef Hubert J, Feuillu B, Mangin P, Lobontiu A, Artis M, Villemot JP (2003) Laparoscopic computer-assisted pyeloplasty: the results of experimental surgery in pigs. BJU Int 92: 437–440PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 790–795PubMed Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 790–795PubMed
28.
go back to reference Newlin ME, Mikami DJ, Melvin SW (2004) Initial experience with the four-arm computer-enhanced telesurgery device in foregut surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 121–124PubMedCrossRef Newlin ME, Mikami DJ, Melvin SW (2004) Initial experience with the four-arm computer-enhanced telesurgery device in foregut surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 121–124PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Niemeyer G, Kuchenbecker KJ, Bonneau R, Mitra P, Reid AM, Fiene J, Weldon G (2004) THUMP: an immersive haptic console for surgical simulation and training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98: 272–274PubMed Niemeyer G, Kuchenbecker KJ, Bonneau R, Mitra P, Reid AM, Fiene J, Weldon G (2004) THUMP: an immersive haptic console for surgical simulation and training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98: 272–274PubMed
30.
go back to reference Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2004) Building a surgical robotics program. Am J Surg 188 (4A Suppl): 16S–18SPubMedCrossRef Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2004) Building a surgical robotics program. Am J Surg 188 (4A Suppl): 16S–18SPubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nio D, Balm R, Maartense S, Guijt M, Bemelman WA (2004) The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27: 283–286PubMed Nio D, Balm R, Maartense S, Guijt M, Bemelman WA (2004) The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27: 283–286PubMed
32.
go back to reference Nio D, Bemelman WA, Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus)-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412–415PubMedCrossRef Nio D, Bemelman WA, Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus)-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412–415PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16: 1095–1108PubMedCrossRef Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16: 1095–1108PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ro CY, Toumpoulis I, Ashton R Jr, Imielinska C, Jebara T, Shin SH, Zipkin J, McGinty J, Todd G, Derose J Jr (2005) A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance. Stud Health Tech Inform 111: 418–421 Ro CY, Toumpoulis I, Ashton R Jr, Imielinska C, Jebara T, Shin SH, Zipkin J, McGinty J, Todd G, Derose J Jr (2005) A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance. Stud Health Tech Inform 111: 418–421
35.
go back to reference Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Pulles B, Kappelhof FM, van der Werken C (2004) Manual robot-assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc 18: 1249–1252PubMedCrossRef Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Pulles B, Kappelhof FM, van der Werken C (2004) Manual robot-assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc 18: 1249–1252PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA (2002) Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84: 223–226PubMed Ruurda JP, van Vroonhoven TJ, Broeders IA (2002) Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84: 223–226PubMed
37.
go back to reference Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M (2004) Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 18: 63–66, discussion 66–67PubMedCrossRef Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M (2004) Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 18: 63–66, discussion 66–67PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Stewart L, Way LW (1995) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 130: 1123–1128, discussion 1129PubMed Stewart L, Way LW (1995) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 130: 1123–1128, discussion 1129PubMed
39.
go back to reference Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Maass H, Hirzinger G, Kuehnapfel U (2003) A virtual reality–based haptic surgical training system. Comput Aided Surg 8: 269–272PubMed Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Maass H, Hirzinger G, Kuehnapfel U (2003) A virtual reality–based haptic surgical training system. Comput Aided Surg 8: 269–272PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery
Authors
A. Mehrabi
C. L. Yetimoglu
A. Nickkholgh
A. Kashfi
P. Kienle
L. Konstantinides
M. R. Ahmadi
H. Fonouni
P. Schemmer
H. Friess
M. M. Gebhard
M. W. Büchler
J. Schmidt
C. N. Gutt
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0612-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006 Go to the issue