Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2006

01-02-2006

Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy

A prospective randomized trial

Authors: P. W. Marcello, P. L. Roberts, L. C. Rusin, R. Holubkov, D. J. Schoetz

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation.

Methods

A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation.

Results

The study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20–50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25–800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group ($317 ± $0 vs $400 ± $112; p < 0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = $317 ± $0 vs S/C = $565 ± $67; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Device failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akari Y, Noake T, Kanazawa M, Momosaki K, Nozoe Y, Inoue A, Ishibashi N, Ogata Y, Shirouzu K (2004) Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas. Kurume Med J 51: 105–108 Akari Y, Noake T, Kanazawa M, Momosaki K, Nozoe Y, Inoue A, Ishibashi N, Ogata Y, Shirouzu K (2004) Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas. Kurume Med J 51: 105–108
2.
go back to reference Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Rosario M, Adams J, Beart R (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–44PubMed Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Rosario M, Adams J, Beart R (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–44PubMed
3.
go back to reference Brown SL, Woo EK (2004) Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. J Am Coll Surg 199: 374–381PubMed Brown SL, Woo EK (2004) Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. J Am Coll Surg 199: 374–381PubMed
4.
go back to reference Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-size arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 377–380PubMed Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-size arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 377–380PubMed
5.
go back to reference Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1680–1685CrossRefPubMed Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1680–1685CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a helping hand or hindrance. Surg Endosc 19: 656–661CrossRefPubMed Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a helping hand or hindrance. Surg Endosc 19: 656–661CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15: 799–801CrossRefPubMed Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15: 799–801CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 592–596CrossRefPubMed Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 592–596CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Levy B, Emery L (2003) Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102: 147–151CrossRefPubMed Levy B, Emery L (2003) Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102: 147–151CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Kercher KW, Mostafa G, Lentzner A, Lipford EH, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2001) Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis. Am Surg 67: 901–906PubMed Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Kercher KW, Mostafa G, Lentzner A, Lipford EH, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2001) Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis. Am Surg 67: 901–906PubMed
11.
go back to reference Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ (2004) Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1371–1376CrossRefPubMed Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ (2004) Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1371–1376CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y (2005) Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 226–228CrossRefPubMed Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y (2005) Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 226–228CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy
A prospective randomized trial
Authors
P. W. Marcello
P. L. Roberts
L. C. Rusin
R. Holubkov
D. J. Schoetz
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0258-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2006 Go to the issue