Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2006

01-01-2006

Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery

Authors: J. Zehetner, A. Kaltenbacher, W. Wayand, A. Shamiyeh

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background:

The increasing number of routinely performed laparoscopic operations causes the surgeons’ “screen work” time to rise constantly. A new ergonomic workload on the surgeons’ upper spine and shoulders is created as a result of the standard screen height position on top of the laparoscopy towers.

Methods:

Eight surgeons in the authors’ surgical department were evaluated for the inclination/reclination angle of their cervical spine when using the laparoscopy towers in the authors’ department and also at their favorable screen height.

Results:

The laparoscopy towers used in the authors’ department made 3° to 14° reclination of the cervical spine necessary. The interviewed surgeons preferred a position of slight inclination, with a median of 160 cm measured from the central screen height to the floor.

Conclusion:

Monitors of laparoscopy towers should be adapted to the surgeon’s preferred screen height: at eye level frontally with a neutral or slight inclination of the cervical spine. The authors suggest a central screen height of 160 cm, with the monitor positioned in front of the surgeon. Newer equipment from the industry should be provided.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (2001) The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons’ upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc 15:1027–1029PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (2001) The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons’ upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc 15:1027–1029PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley D (1999) A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp. Ergonomics 42: 1634–1645PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley D (1999) A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp. Ergonomics 42: 1634–1645PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 139–142PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 139–142PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15: 1204–1207PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15: 1204–1207PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berquer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 416–421PubMedCrossRef Berquer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 416–421PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brown SI, White C, Wipat K, Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (2004) Characterizing the “gold standard” image for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 1192–1195PubMedCrossRef Brown SI, White C, Wipat K, Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (2004) Characterizing the “gold standard” image for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 1192–1195PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance, and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84: 1460–1464PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance, and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84: 1460–1464PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481–484PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481–484PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 436–440; Epub Jan 10, 2005PubMedCrossRef Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 436–440; Epub Jan 10, 2005PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M (2004) Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc 18: 1231–1241PubMedCrossRef Matern U, Kuttler G, Giebmeyer C, Waller P, Faist M (2004) Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc 18: 1231–1241PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT (2005) Monitor height affects surgeons’ stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 111: 498–501PubMed Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT (2005) Monitor height affects surgeons’ stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 111: 498–501PubMed
13.
go back to reference Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Goossens RH, Meijer DW, Bussmann JB (2002) Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16: 674–8, Epub December 31, 2001CrossRef Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Goossens RH, Meijer DW, Bussmann JB (2002) Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16: 674–8, Epub December 31, 2001CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery
Authors
J. Zehetner
A. Kaltenbacher
W. Wayand
A. Shamiyeh
Publication date
01-01-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0251-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2006 Go to the issue