Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Original article

The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction

Authors: M. S. Maish, S. R. DeMeester, E. Choustoulakis, J. W. Briel, J. A. Hagen, J. H. Peters, J. C. Lipham, C. G. Bremner, T. R. DeMeester

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although rare, graft ischemia and necrosis after esophagectomy is a devastating complication. The aim of this study was to review our experience with early endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis after esophagectomy and reconstruction.

Methods

From a population of 479 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 1996–2003, we identified 102 patients who had endoscopy within 21 days of operation.

Results

Endoscopy was performed a median of 9 days after operation. Graft ischemia, anastomotic leak, or both were found in 63 of the 102 patients. Reoperation was necessary in 27% of these patients, including graft removal in nine patients. In 39 patients, endoscopy demonstrated a healthy graft; only one of these patients (2.6%) required reoperation. No patient with ischemia judged insufficient to warrant graft removal on initial endoscopy subsequently lost their graft. There were no complications or anastomotic injuries associated with early endoscopy.

Conclusion

Endoscopy early after esophagectomy is safe and provides accurate and reliable identification of graft ischemia that can be used to guide the treatment of these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyle, N, Pearce, A, Hunter, D, Owen, W, Mason, R 1999Intraoperative scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resectionJ Am Coll Surg188498502CrossRefPubMed Boyle, N, Pearce, A, Hunter, D, Owen, W, Mason, R 1999Intraoperative scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resectionJ Am Coll Surg188498502CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Davis, P, Law, S, Wong, J 2003Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancerArch Surg138303308CrossRefPubMed Davis, P, Law, S, Wong, J 2003Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancerArch Surg138303308CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Urschel, J 1995Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a reviewAm J Surg169634640CrossRefPubMed Urschel, J 1995Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a reviewAm J Surg169634640CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Briel, J, Tamhankar, AP, Hagen, JA, DeMeester, SR, Johansson, J, Choustoulakis, E, Peters, JH, Bremner, CG, DeMeester, TR 2004Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up vs colon interpositionJ Am Coll Surg198536541CrossRefPubMed Briel, J, Tamhankar, AP, Hagen, JA, DeMeester, SR, Johansson, J, Choustoulakis, E, Peters, JH, Bremner, CG, DeMeester, TR 2004Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up vs colon interpositionJ Am Coll Surg198536541CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction
Authors
M. S. Maish
S. R. DeMeester
E. Choustoulakis
J. W. Briel
J. A. Hagen
J. H. Peters
J. C. Lipham
C. G. Bremner
T. R. DeMeester
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8816-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2005 Go to the issue