Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original article

Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task

Authors: K. R. Van Sickle, D. A. McClusky III, A. G. Gallagher, C. D. Smith

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of simulation for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) skills training has many advantages over current traditional methods. One advantage of simulation is that it enables an objective assessment of technical performance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the ProMIS augmented reality simulator could objectively distinguish between levels of performance skills on a complex laparoscopic suturing task.

Methods

Ten subjects — five laparoscopic experts and five laparoscopic novices — were assessed for baseline perceptual, visio-spatial, and psychomotor abilities using validated tests. After three trials of a novel laparoscopic suturing task were performed on the simulator, measures for time, smoothness of movement, and path distance were analyzed for each trial. Accuracy and errors were evaluated separately by two blinded reviewers to an interrater reliability of >0.8. Comparisons of mean performance measures were made between the two groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Internal consistency of ProMIS measures was assessed with coefficient α.

Results

The psychomotor performance of the experts was superior at baseline assessment (p < 0.001). On the laparoscopic suturing task, the experts performed significantly better than the novices across all three trials (p < 0.001). They performed the tasks between three and four times faster (p < 0.0001), had three times shorter instrument path length (p < 0.0001), and had four times greater smoothness of instrument movement (p < 0.009). Experts also showed greater consistency in their performance, as demonstrated by SDs across all measures, which were four times smaller than the novice group. Observed internal consistency of ProMIS measures was high (α = 0.95, p < 0.00001).

Conclusions

Preliminary results of construct validation efforts of the ProMIS simulator show that it can distinguish between experts and novices and has promising psychometric properties. The attractive feature of ProMIS is that a wide variety of MIS tasks can be used to train and assess technical skills.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill. BMJ 318: 887PubMed Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill. BMJ 318: 887PubMed
2.
go back to reference Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193: 479–485CrossRefPubMed Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193: 479–485CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gallagher A, Satava R (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic pyschomotor skills. Surg Endosc 16: 1746–1752CrossRefPubMed Gallagher A, Satava R (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic pyschomotor skills. Surg Endosc 16: 1746–1752CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gallagher A, Lederman A, McGlade K, Satava R, Smith CD (2004) Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc 18:660–665CrossRef Gallagher A, Lederman A, McGlade K, Satava R, Smith CD (2004) Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc 18:660–665CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Grantcharov T, Kristiansen V, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91: 146–150CrossRefPubMed Grantcharov T, Kristiansen V, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91: 146–150CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kothari S, Kaplan B, DeMaria E, Broderick T, Merrell RC (2002) Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. J Laparoendoscop Adv Surg Tech 12: 167–173CrossRef Kothari S, Kaplan B, DeMaria E, Broderick T, Merrell RC (2002) Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. J Laparoendoscop Adv Surg Tech 12: 167–173CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pearson A, Gallagher A, Rosser J, Satava R (2002) Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16: 130–137CrossRefPubMed Pearson A, Gallagher A, Rosser J, Satava R (2002) Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16: 130–137CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230CrossRefPubMed Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rosser J, Rosser L, Salvagi R (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204PubMed Rosser J, Rosser L, Salvagi R (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204PubMed
10.
12.
go back to reference Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc 17:1943–1950CrossRefPubMed Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc 17:1943–1950CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brien M, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463CrossRefPubMed Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brien M, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Smith S, Torkington J, Brown T, Taffinder NJ, Darzi A (2001) Motion analysis: a tool for assessing laparoscopic dexterity in the performance of a laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 640–645CrossRefPubMed Smith S, Torkington J, Brown T, Taffinder NJ, Darzi A (2001) Motion analysis: a tool for assessing laparoscopic dexterity in the performance of a laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 640–645CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Taffinder N, Smith S, Mair J, Russel R, Darzi A (1999) Can a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endosc 13(Suppl 1): 81 Taffinder N, Smith S, Mair J, Russel R, Darzi A (1999) Can a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endosc 13(Suppl 1): 81
16.
go back to reference Villegas L, Schneider BE, Gallery MP, Jones UB (2003) Laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 17: 1879–1888CrossRefPubMed Villegas L, Schneider BE, Gallery MP, Jones UB (2003) Laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 17: 1879–1888CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task
Authors
K. R. Van Sickle
D. A. McClusky III
A. G. Gallagher
C. D. Smith
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8274-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2005 Go to the issue