Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2005

01-01-2005 | Original article

A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE

Authors: D. E. Wenner, P. Whitwam, J. Rosser, S. Hashmi, D. E. Wenner III

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has proved to be a safe, cost-effective way to treat common bile duct (CBD) stones. Despite this, LCBDE has not gained widespread adoption by surgeons. The technique has proved difficult to master, and damage to the fragile choledochoscope by grasping forceps and passage through the port valves has been problematic. Cases involving large, impacted, or multiple stones have required conversion to open exploration of CBD.

Methods

The Multichannel Instrument Guide (MIG) is introduced as a solution for these problems. The MIG is a J-shaped plastic extrusion with three lumens. It is flexible and can be straightened for insertion through a 10-mm port. The MIG facilitates insertion of a flexible 2.8- to 3.2-mm choledochoscope into the CBD. At the same time, additional tools such as balloon or irrigation catheters and lithotripters can be introduced into the CBD. These can be manipulated under video guidance via the choledochoscope. This procedural multitasking allows for a more efficient LCBDE. The authors describe their initial experience using the MIG for 23 patients.

Results

Of the 23 patients who underwent LCBDE procedures, 20 had stones in the CBD. Multiple stones were present in 48% of the patients; impacted stones were present in 26% of the patients; and stones larger than 1 cm were present in 26% of the patients. A 95% stone clearance rate was achieved. Difficult cases with large, impacted or multiple stones were resolved using the MIG. Two choledochoscopes were damaged; one during surgery and one during cleaning and storage.

Conclusions

The MIG has demonstrated significant advantages over previously described techniques. The device secures biliary tract access and allows procedural multitasking while protecting the delicate and expensive equipment. Subsequently, a simplified technique algorithm can be followed that may encourage more surgeons to adopt the routine performance of LCBDE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beal, JM 1984Historical perspective of gallstone diseaseSurg Gynecol Obstet158181189PubMed Beal, JM 1984Historical perspective of gallstone diseaseSurg Gynecol Obstet158181189PubMed
2.
go back to reference Berci, G, Morgenstern, L 1994Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stonesSurg Endosc811681175CrossRefPubMed Berci, G, Morgenstern, L 1994Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stonesSurg Endosc811681175CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health Care Statistics, Hospital Care Statistics Branch: Retreived February 24, 2003 at http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/tables/2002/02hus095.pdf. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health Care Statistics, Hospital Care Statistics Branch: Retreived February 24, 2003 at http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/tables/2002/02hus095.pdf.
4.
go back to reference Cotton, P, Lehman, G, Vennes, J, Geenen, JE, Russell, RCG, Meyers, WC, Liguory, C, Nick, N 1991Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensusGastrointest Endosc37383393PubMed Cotton, P, Lehman, G, Vennes, J, Geenen, JE, Russell, RCG, Meyers, WC, Liguory, C, Nick, N 1991Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensusGastrointest Endosc37383393PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cuscheri, A, Lezoche, E, Morino, M 1999EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculiSurg Endosc13952957CrossRefPubMed Cuscheri, A, Lezoche, E, Morino, M 1999EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculiSurg Endosc13952957CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Freeman, ML, Nelson, DB, Sherman, S, et al. 1996Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomyN Engl J Med335:909918CrossRef Freeman, ML, Nelson, DB, Sherman, S,  et al. 1996Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomyN Engl J Med335:909918CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Geenen, D, Geenen, J, Jafri, F, et al. 1998The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stonesEndoscopy301820PubMed Geenen, D, Geenen, J, Jafri, F,  et al. 1998The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stonesEndoscopy301820PubMed
8.
go back to reference Giurgiu, DI, Margulies, DR, Carroll, BJ, et al. 1999Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcomeArch Surg134839844CrossRefPubMed Giurgiu, DI, Margulies, DR, Carroll, BJ,  et al. 1999Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcomeArch Surg134839844CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Glen, F, McShervey, CK 1975Calculus biliary diseaseRavitch, MM eds. Current problems in surgery. Year Book Medical.Chicago138 Glen, F, McShervey, CK 1975Calculus biliary diseaseRavitch, MM eds. Current problems in surgery. Year Book Medical.Chicago138
10.
go back to reference Hakamada, K, Sasaki, M, Endoh, M, et al. 1997Late development of bile duct cancer after sphincteroplasty: a ten- to twenty-two-year follow-up studySurgery121488492CrossRefPubMed Hakamada, K, Sasaki, M, Endoh, M,  et al. 1997Late development of bile duct cancer after sphincteroplasty: a ten- to twenty-two-year follow-up studySurgery121488492CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ideda, S, Tanaka, M, Matsumoto, S, et al. 1998Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-upEndoscopy20317 Ideda, S, Tanaka, M, Matsumoto, S,  et al. 1998Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-upEndoscopy20317
12.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 1993 Am J Surg165390396 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 1993  Am J Surg165390396
13.
go back to reference Paganni, AM, Feliciotti, F, Guerrieri, M, et al. 2001Laparoscopic common bile duct explorationJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech11391400CrossRef Paganni, AM, Feliciotti, F, Guerrieri, M,  et al. 2001Laparoscopic common bile duct explorationJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech11391400CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Petelin, JB 1993Clinical results of common bile duct explorationEndosc Surg1125129 Petelin, JB 1993Clinical results of common bile duct explorationEndosc Surg1125129
15.
go back to reference Poon, R, Yeung, C, Liu, C, Yuen, W, Lo, C, Tang, A, Fan, S 2003Intravenous bolus somatostatin after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography reduces the incidence of pancreatitis associated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: a randomized controlled trialGut5217681773CrossRefPubMed Poon, R, Yeung, C, Liu, C, Yuen, W, Lo, C, Tang, A, Fan, S 2003Intravenous bolus somatostatin after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography reduces the incidence of pancreatitis associated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: a randomized controlled trialGut5217681773CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rhodes, M, Sussman, L, Cohen, L, Louis, MP 1998Randomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stonesLancet351159161CrossRefPubMed Rhodes, M, Sussman, L, Cohen, L, Louis, MP 1998Randomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stonesLancet351159161CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ricardi, R, Islam, S, Canete, JJ, Arcand, PL, Stoker, ME 2003Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct explorationSurg Endosc171922CrossRefPubMed Ricardi, R, Islam, S, Canete, JJ, Arcand, PL, Stoker, ME 2003Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct explorationSurg Endosc171922CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stoker, ME 1995Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgeryArch Surg130265269PubMed Stoker, ME 1995Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgeryArch Surg130265269PubMed
19.
go back to reference Strong, R 1999Late bile duct cancer complicating biliary-enteric anastomosis for benign diseaseAm J Surg177472474 Strong, R 1999Late bile duct cancer complicating biliary-enteric anastomosis for benign diseaseAm J Surg177472474
20.
go back to reference Tanaka, M, Takahata, S, Konomi, H, et al. 1998Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stonesGastrointest Endosc48465469PubMed Tanaka, M, Takahata, S, Konomi, H,  et al. 1998Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stonesGastrointest Endosc48465469PubMed
21.
go back to reference Vaira, D, Ainley, C, Willimas, S, et al. 1989Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1,000 PatientsLancetii431434CrossRef Vaira, D, Ainley, C, Willimas, S,  et al. 1989Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1,000 PatientsLancetii431434CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE
Authors
D. E. Wenner
P. Whitwam
J. Rosser
S. Hashmi
D. E. Wenner III
Publication date
01-01-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8130-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2005 Go to the issue