Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2004

01-08-2004 | Original article

Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study

Authors: U. Matern, G. Kuttler, C. Giebmeyer, P. Waller, M. Faist

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ergonomic deficiencies of various minimally invasive surgery (MIS) instrument handles are well-known. In the past, many studies have been performed to gain a better understanding of ergonomics in MIS. The current study investigates muscle strain during various dynamic tasks with different instrument handles.

Methods

Five different handle designs were tested: the axial handle (Aesculap), the vario handle (own model), multifunctional and ring handles (both Karl Storz), and the shank handle (Wilo). Ten subjects without any surgical training tested the following instrument functions: precise dynamic movement, rotation of the closed instrument, and simultaneous opening and closing of the effector. During these three trials, task performance (errors / duration) and the electromyographic activity of the hand and lower arm muscles were measured.

Results

Regarding the errors and the time required to carry out the tasks, the five handles showed similar results. The muscle activity was lowest for the precise dynamic movement task and highest during the rotation task. The axial handle required significantly more muscle activity than all other handles.

Conclusion

On the basis of these data, it was possible to construct characteristic muscle activation patterns for each handle. However, these patterns were not task specific. Accordingly, they may form a basis to improve the ergonomics of MIS handles with regard to muscle strain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Beckley, D 1998An ergonomic comparison of inline vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasperSurg Endosc12805808CrossRefPubMed Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Beckley, D 1998An ergonomic comparison of inline vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasperSurg Endosc12805808CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Remler, M, Beckley, D 1999A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic reponses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm graspErgonomics4216341645CrossRefPubMed Berguer, R, Gerber, S, Kilpatrick, G, Remler, M, Beckley, D 1999A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic reponses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm graspErgonomics4216341645CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Berguer, R, Rab, GT, Abu-Ghaida, H, Alarcon, A, Chung, J 1997A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical proceduresSurg Endosc11139142CrossRefPubMed Berguer, R, Rab, GT, Abu-Ghaida, H, Alarcon, A, Chung, J 1997A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical proceduresSurg Endosc11139142CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Corlett, EN 1995The evaluation of posture and its effectsWilson, JRCorlett, EN eds. Evaluation of human work. A practical ergonomics methodologyTaylor & FrancisLondon689692 Corlett, EN 1995The evaluation of posture and its effectsWilson, JRCorlett, EN eds. Evaluation of human work. A practical ergonomics methodologyTaylor & FrancisLondon689692
5.
go back to reference Emam, T, Frank, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2001Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturingSurg Endosc15667672CrossRefPubMed Emam, T, Frank, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2001Influence of handle design on the surgeon’s upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturingSurg Endosc15667672CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Emam, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2002Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturingSurg Endosc16267271CrossRefPubMed Emam, T, Hanna, G, Cuschieri, A 2002Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturingSurg Endosc16267271CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hanna, GB, Shimi, S, Cuschieri, A 1997Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporal knottingSurg Endosc11397401CrossRefPubMed Hanna, GB, Shimi, S, Cuschieri, A 1997Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporal knottingSurg Endosc11397401CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Laparoscopic Surgery Update1997Reduce fatigue and discomfort: tips to improve operating room setupLaparosc Surg Update597100 Laparoscopic Surgery Update1997Reduce fatigue and discomfort: tips to improve operating room setupLaparosc Surg Update597100
9.
go back to reference Matern, U 2001Principles of ergonomic instrument handlesMin Invas Ther Allied Technol10169173CrossRef Matern, U 2001Principles of ergonomic instrument handlesMin Invas Ther Allied Technol10169173CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001) Ergonomic aspects of different handles for minimally invasive surgery—an EMG-based study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting, pp 1269–1273 Matern U, Giebmeyer C, Bergmann R, Faist M (2001) Ergonomic aspects of different handles for minimally invasive surgery—an EMG-based study. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting, pp 1269–1273
11.
go back to reference Matern, U, Giebmeyer, C, Bergmann, R, Waller, P, Faist, M 2002Ergonomic aspects of four different types of laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow angle—an EMG-based studySurg Endosc1615281532CrossRefPubMed Matern, U, Giebmeyer, C, Bergmann, R, Waller, P, Faist, M 2002Ergonomic aspects of four different types of laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow angle—an EMG-based studySurg Endosc1615281532CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matern, U, Rückauer, KD, Farthmann, EH 2000Die Arbeitshaltung des laparoskopisch tätigen Chirurgen—Ideal und WirklichkeitZentr Chir125698701CrossRef Matern, U, Rückauer, KD, Farthmann, EH 2000Die Arbeitshaltung des laparoskopisch tätigen Chirurgen—Ideal und WirklichkeitZentr Chir125698701CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Matern, U, Waller, P 1999Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handlesSurg Endosc13174182CrossRefPubMed Matern, U, Waller, P 1999Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handlesSurg Endosc13174182CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Matern, U, Waller, P, Eichenlaub, M, Rückauer, KD 1999MIS instruments: an experimental comparison of various laparoscopic handles and their designSurg Endosc13756762CrossRefPubMed Matern, U, Waller, P, Eichenlaub, M, Rückauer, KD 1999MIS instruments: an experimental comparison of various laparoscopic handles and their designSurg Endosc13756762CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patkin, M, Isabel, L 1993Ergonomics and laparoscopic general surgeryGraber, JNSchultz, LSPietrafitta, JJHickok, DF eds. Laparoscopic abdominal surgeryMcGraw-HillNew York Patkin, M, Isabel, L 1993Ergonomics and laparoscopic general surgeryGraber, JNSchultz, LSPietrafitta, JJHickok, DF eds. Laparoscopic abdominal surgeryMcGraw-HillNew York
17.
go back to reference Quick, NE, Gillette, JC, Shapiro, R, Adrales, GL, Gerlach, D, Park, AE 2003The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training proceduresSurg Endosc17462465CrossRefPubMed Quick, NE, Gillette, JC, Shapiro, R, Adrales, GL, Gerlach, D, Park, AE 2003The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training proceduresSurg Endosc17462465CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rau, G 1977Anwendung der Elektromyographie bei der Beurteilung körperlicher Momentan-und LangzeitbeanspruchungZ Arb Wiss31112120 Rau, G 1977Anwendung der Elektromyographie bei der Beurteilung körperlicher Momentan-und LangzeitbeanspruchungZ Arb Wiss31112120
19.
go back to reference Rohmert, W 1973Physische BeanspruchungSchmidtke, H eds. Ergonomie 1Grundlagen menschlicher Arbeit und Leistung. Carl Hanser VerlagMunich225255 Rohmert, W 1973Physische BeanspruchungSchmidtke, H eds. Ergonomie 1Grundlagen menschlicher Arbeit und Leistung. Carl Hanser VerlagMunich225255
20.
go back to reference Uchal, A, Brogger, J, Rukas, R, Karlsen, B, Bergamaschi, R 2002In-line versus pistol-grip handles in a laparoscopic simulators. A randomized controlled crossover trialSurg Endosc1617711773CrossRefPubMed Uchal, A, Brogger, J, Rukas, R, Karlsen, B, Bergamaschi, R 2002In-line versus pistol-grip handles in a laparoscopic simulators. A randomized controlled crossover trialSurg Endosc1617711773CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW 1999Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeonsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techiques A9481489 Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW 1999Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeonsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techiques A9481489
22.
go back to reference Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW, Goossens, RHM, Snijders, CJ 2001New ergonomic criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forcepsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques111726CrossRef Veelen, MA, Meijer, DW, Goossens, RHM, Snijders, CJ 2001New ergonomic criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forcepsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques111726CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study
Authors
U. Matern
G. Kuttler
C. Giebmeyer
P. Waller
M. Faist
Publication date
01-08-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9162-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2004 Go to the issue