Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2004

01-05-2004 | Original article

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Endoloops: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors: G. Beldi, K. Muggli, C. Helbling, R. Schlumpf

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Inadequate closure of the appendix stump can lead to abscess formation or peritonitis. This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the number of endoloops needed in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods

A total of 208 patients were randomized in two groups: 109 in group 1 using one and 99 in group 2 using two proximal endoloops. The groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative complications.

Results

Postoperative complications were found in five patients (4.6%) in group 1, consisting of intraabdominal abscesses (three patients), pulmonary embolism (one patient), and persisting port-site pain (one patient). In group 2, postoperative complications were found in five patients (5.1%), consisting of intraabdominal abscesses (four patients) and prolonged percutaneous drainage (one patient). There was no significant difference between the two groups.

Discussion

In acute appendicitis, a minimal inflamed appendix base can be safely divided using one endoloop.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cristalli, BG, Izard, V, Jacob, D, Levardon, M 1991Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier.Surg Endosc5176178PubMed Cristalli, BG, Izard, V, Jacob, D, Levardon, M 1991Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier.Surg Endosc5176178PubMed
2.
go back to reference Engstrom, L, Fenyo, G 1985Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.Br J Surg72971972PubMed Engstrom, L, Fenyo, G 1985Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.Br J Surg72971972PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kazemier G Zeeuw, GR, Lange, JF, Hop, WC, Bonjer, HJ 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial.Surg Endosc11336340CrossRefPubMed Kazemier G Zeeuw, GR, Lange, JF, Hop, WC, Bonjer, HJ 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial.Surg Endosc11336340CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.Br J Surg88200205PubMed Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.Br J Surg88200205PubMed
6.
go back to reference Wagner, M, Aronsky, D, Tschudi, J, Metzger, A, Klaiber, C 1996Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases.Surg Endosc10895899CrossRefPubMed Wagner, M, Aronsky, D, Tschudi, J, Metzger, A, Klaiber, C 1996Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases.Surg Endosc10895899CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Endoloops: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors
G. Beldi
K. Muggli
C. Helbling
R. Schlumpf
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9156-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2004 Go to the issue