Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2004

01-08-2004 | Original article

The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning

Authors: T. Mahmood, A. Darzi

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Background

The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.

Methods

Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.

Results

There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator
Literature
1.
go back to reference Calman, KC, Temple, JG 1999Reforming higher specialist training in the United KingdomMed Education332833CrossRef Calman, KC, Temple, JG 1999Reforming higher specialist training in the United KingdomMed Education332833CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chaudhry, A, Sutton, C 1999Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MST VR: quality of human computer interfaceAnn R Coll Surg Eng81281286 Chaudhry, A, Sutton, C 1999Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MST VR: quality of human computer interfaceAnn R Coll Surg Eng81281286
3.
go back to reference Hochberg, J, Maiss, J, Magdeburg, B, et al. 2001Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001Endoscopy33541549CrossRefPubMed Hochberg, J, Maiss, J, Magdeburg, B,  et al. 2001Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001Endoscopy33541549CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Katz, PO 1995Providing feedbackGastrointestinal Endosc Clin North Am5347355 Katz, PO 1995Providing feedbackGastrointestinal Endosc Clin North Am5347355
5.
go back to reference Mahmood, T, Darzi, A 2003The colonoscopy simulator as a teaching toolGut52262CrossRef Mahmood, T, Darzi, A 2003The colonoscopy simulator as a teaching toolGut52262CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mahmood, T, Darzi, A, Bouchier Hayes, D 2003Is the UK gastrointestinal endoscopy training adequate? The trainer and trainee’s perspectiveGut5221CrossRef Mahmood, T, Darzi, A, Bouchier Hayes, D 2003Is the UK gastrointestinal endoscopy training adequate? The trainer and trainee’s perspectiveGut5221CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mallinson, R 2000Training in sigmoidoscopy: the experience of trainees in elderly medicine in East AngliaInt J Clin Practice54265266 Mallinson, R 2000Training in sigmoidoscopy: the experience of trainees in elderly medicine in East AngliaInt J Clin Practice54265266
8.
go back to reference Sivak, MV, et al. 1995The art of endoscopic instructionGastrointest Endosc Clin North Am5299310 Sivak, MV,  et al. 1995The art of endoscopic instructionGastrointest Endosc Clin North Am5299310
9.
go back to reference Yeh, MM, Cahill, DF 1999Quantifying physician teaching productivity using clinical relative value unitsJ Gen Internal Med14617621CrossRef Yeh, MM, Cahill, DF 1999Quantifying physician teaching productivity using clinical relative value unitsJ Gen Internal Med14617621CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning
Authors
T. Mahmood
A. Darzi
Publication date
01-08-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2004 Go to the issue

Commentary

Commentary