Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2004

01-01-2004 | Original article

Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy

Authors: K. W. Kercher, T. H. Nguyen, K. L. Harold, M. E. Poplin, B. D. Matthews, R. F. Sing, B. T. Heniford

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Wound protectors are plastic sheaths that can be used to line a wound during surgery. Wound protectors can facilitate retraction of an incision without the need for other mechanical retractors and have been proposed as deterrents to wound infection. The purpose of this study was to define the ability of wound protectors to reduce the rate of infection when used in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Methods: We completed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients undergoing nonemergent laparoscopic-assisted colectomy between February 1999 and November 2002. All completely laparoscopic cases were excluded. The wound protector, when used, was applied to the extraction incision during the externalized portion of the procedure (colon and mesentery transection, anastomosis). Outcomes for patients with and without the use of a wound protector were compared. Results: A total of 141 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (98 for benign/malignant tumors, 35 for diverticular disease, and eight for Crohn’s disease). There were no differences between the wound protector group (n = 84) and the no wound protector group (n = 57) with respect to mean age (55 vs 58 years), average body mass index (27 vs 29 kg/m2), gender, indication for surgery, comorbidities, antibiotics used, or mean operative time (185 vs 173 min). Nine patients in the wound protector group and eight in the no wound protector group developed a wound infection at the colon extraction site (p = 0.42). Patients undergoing resection for Crohn’s disease or diverticulitis had a higher infection rate (18.6%) than patients undergoing resection for polyps or cancer (9.2%; p < 0.05). No wound recurrence of cancer was observed in either group at a mean follow-up of 23 months (range, 3–48). Conclusions: The wound protector, although useful for mechanical retraction of small wounds, does not significantly diminish the rate of wound infection at the bowel resection/anastomotic site. Patients undergoing elective resection for inflammatory processes have higher infection rates than patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for polyps or cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference French, ML, Eitzen, HE, Ritter, MA 1976The plastic surgical adhesive drape: an evaluation of its efficacy as a microbial barrier.Ann Surg1844650PubMed French, ML, Eitzen, HE, Ritter, MA 1976The plastic surgical adhesive drape: an evaluation of its efficacy as a microbial barrier.Ann Surg1844650PubMed
2.
go back to reference HALS Study Group2000Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopy for colorectal disease.Surg Endosc14896901 HALS Study Group2000Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopy for colorectal disease.Surg Endosc14896901
3.
go back to reference Harrower, HW 1968Isolation of incisions into body cavities.Am J Surg116824826PubMed Harrower, HW 1968Isolation of incisions into body cavities.Am J Surg116824826PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jackson, DW, Pollock, AV, Tindal, DS 1971The value of a plastic adhesive drape in the prevention of wound infection. A controlled trial.Br J Surg58340342PubMed Jackson, DW, Pollock, AV, Tindal, DS 1971The value of a plastic adhesive drape in the prevention of wound infection. A controlled trial.Br J Surg58340342PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nakagoe, T, Sawai, T, Tsuji, T, Nanashima, A, Jibiki, M, Yamaguchi, H, Yasutake, T, Ayabe, H, Shimomura, K 2001Minilaparotomy wound edge protector (Lap-Protector): a new device.Surg Today31850852CrossRefPubMed Nakagoe, T, Sawai, T, Tsuji, T, Nanashima, A, Jibiki, M, Yamaguchi, H, Yasutake, T, Ayabe, H, Shimomura, K 2001Minilaparotomy wound edge protector (Lap-Protector): a new device.Surg Today31850852CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nystrom, PO, Brote, L 1980Effects of a plastic wound drape on contamination with enterobacteria and on infection after appendicectomy.Acta Chir Scand1466570PubMed Nystrom, PO, Brote, L 1980Effects of a plastic wound drape on contamination with enterobacteria and on infection after appendicectomy.Acta Chir Scand1466570PubMed
7.
go back to reference Peacock, JL, Lawrence, WT, Peacock, EE 1993.O’Leary, JP eds. The physiologic basis of surgery.Williams & WilkinsBaltimore95111 Peacock, JL, Lawrence, WT, Peacock, EE 1993.O’Leary, JP eds. The physiologic basis of surgery.Williams & WilkinsBaltimore95111
8.
go back to reference Psaila, JV, Wheeler, MH, Crosby, DL 1977The role of plastic wound drapes in the prevention of wound infection following abdominal surgery.Br J Surg64729732PubMed Psaila, JV, Wheeler, MH, Crosby, DL 1977The role of plastic wound drapes in the prevention of wound infection following abdominal surgery.Br J Surg64729732PubMed
9.
go back to reference Raahave, D 1976Effect of plastic skin and wound drapes on the density of bacteria in operation wounds.BrJ Surg63421426 Raahave, D 1976Effect of plastic skin and wound drapes on the density of bacteria in operation wounds.BrJ Surg63421426
10.
go back to reference Sookhai, S, Redmond, HP, Deasy, JM 1999Impervious wound-edge protector to reduce postoperative wound infection: a randomised, controlled trial.Lancet3531585CrossRef Sookhai, S, Redmond, HP, Deasy, JM 1999Impervious wound-edge protector to reduce postoperative wound infection: a randomised, controlled trial.Lancet3531585CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stocchi, L, Nelson, H 2000Wound recurrences following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer.Arch Surg135948958CrossRefPubMed Stocchi, L, Nelson, H 2000Wound recurrences following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer.Arch Surg135948958CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Targarona, EM, Gracia, E, Garriga, J, Martinez-Bru, ., Cotes, M, Boluda, R, Lerma, L, Trias, M 2002Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy.Surg Endosc16234239CrossRefPubMed Targarona, EM, Gracia, E, Garriga, J, Martinez-Bru, ., Cotes, M, Boluda, R, Lerma, L, Trias, M 2002Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy.Surg Endosc16234239CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weeks, JC, Nelson, H, Gelber, S, Sargent, D, Schroeder, G 2002Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.J Am Med Assoc287321329CrossRef Weeks, JC, Nelson, H, Gelber, S, Sargent, D, Schroeder, G 2002Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.J Am Med Assoc287321329CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Williams, JA, Oates, GD, Brown, PP, Burden, DW, McCall, J, Hutchison, AG, Lees, LJ 1972Abdominal wound infections and plastic wound guards.Br J Surg59142146PubMed Williams, JA, Oates, GD, Brown, PP, Burden, DW, McCall, J, Hutchison, AG, Lees, LJ 1972Abdominal wound infections and plastic wound guards.Br J Surg59142146PubMed
15.
go back to reference Zoutman, D, McDonald, S, Vethanayagan, D 1998Total and attributable costs of surgical-wound infections at a Canadian tertiary care center.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol19254259 Zoutman, D, McDonald, S, Vethanayagan, D 1998Total and attributable costs of surgical-wound infections at a Canadian tertiary care center.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol19254259
Metadata
Title
Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy
Authors
K. W. Kercher
T. H. Nguyen
K. L. Harold
M. E. Poplin
B. D. Matthews
R. F. Sing
B. T. Heniford
Publication date
01-01-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8137-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2004 Go to the issue