Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2003

01-10-2003 | Original article

A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures

Authors: M. A. Talamini, S. Chapman, S. Horgan, W. S. Melvin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The Academic Robotics Group prospectively studied 211 robotically assisted operations to assess the safety and utility of robotically assisted surgery. Methods: All operations took place at one of four member institutions between June 2000 and June 2001 using the recently FDA-approved daVinci robotic system. A variety of procedures were undertaken, including antireflux surgery (69), cholecystectomy (36), Heller myotomy (26), bowel resection (17), donor nephrectomy (15), left internal mammery artery mobilization (14), gastric bypass (seven), splenectomy (seven), adrenalectomy (six), exploratory laparoscopy (three), pyloroplasty (four), gastrojejunostomy (two), distal pancreatectomy (one), duodenal polypectomy (one), esophagectomy (one), gastric mass resection (one), and lysis of adhesions (one). Results: Average operating room time was 188 min (range 45 to 387, SD = 83), surgical time 143 min (range 35 to 462, SD = 63), and robot time 90 min (range 12 to 235, SD = 47). Median length of stay was 1 day (range 0 to 37). There were 8 (4%) technical complications during procedures, five minor (four hook cautery dislodgement, one slipped robotic trocar) and three major (system malfunctions, two of which required conversion to standard laparoscopy). In all cases, technical problems caused only delay, without apparent altered outcome. There were medical/surgical complications in nine patients (4%). Six (3%) were considered major, including one death unrelated to the robotic procedure. Conclusions: The results of robotic-assisted surgery compare favorably with those of conventional laparoscopy with respect to mortality, complications, and length of stay. Robotic-assisted surgery is safe and effective and is a new reality for American surgery. The role of these devices in surgery will expand as the technology evolves.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cadiere, GB, Himpens, J, Germay, O, Izizaw, R, Degueldre, M, Vandromme, J, Capelluto, E, Bruyns, J 2001Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.World J Surg2514671477PubMed Cadiere, GB, Himpens, J, Germay, O, Izizaw, R, Degueldre, M, Vandromme, J, Capelluto, E, Bruyns, J 2001Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.World J Surg2514671477PubMed
2.
go back to reference Maniscalo-Theberge, ME, Elliott, DC 1999Virtual reality, robotics, and other wizardy in 21st century trauma care.Surg Clin North Am7912411248PubMed Maniscalo-Theberge, ME, Elliott, DC 1999Virtual reality, robotics, and other wizardy in 21st century trauma care.Surg Clin North Am7912411248PubMed
3.
go back to reference Marescaux, J, Smith, MK, Folscher, D, Jamali, F, Malassagne, B, Leroy, J 2001Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients.Ann Surg23417CrossRefPubMed Marescaux, J, Smith, MK, Folscher, D, Jamali, F, Malassagne, B, Leroy, J 2001Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients.Ann Surg23417CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Melvin, WS, Krause, KR, Needleman, BJ, Schneider, C, Ellison, EC 2002Computer enhanced versus standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery.J GI Surg63235 Melvin, WS, Krause, KR, Needleman, BJ, Schneider, C, Ellison, EC 2002Computer enhanced versus standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery.J GI Surg63235
5.
go back to reference Satava, RM, Jones, SB 2000Preparing surgeons for the 21st century.Surg Clin North Am8013531365 Satava, RM, Jones, SB 2000Preparing surgeons for the 21st century.Surg Clin North Am8013531365
6.
go back to reference Sung, GT, Gill, IS 2001Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the daVinci and Zeus systems.Urology58893898CrossRefPubMed Sung, GT, Gill, IS 2001Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the daVinci and Zeus systems.Urology58893898CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Taylor, RH, Joskowicz, L, Williamson, B, Gueziec, A, Kalvin, A, Kazanzides, P, Van Vorhis, R, Yao, J, Kumar, R, Bzostek, A, Sahay, A, Borner, M, Lahmer, A 1999Computer-integrated revision total hip replacement surgery: concept and preliminary results.Med Image Anal3301319 Taylor, RH, Joskowicz, L, Williamson, B, Gueziec, A, Kalvin, A, Kazanzides, P, Van Vorhis, R, Yao, J, Kumar, R, Bzostek, A, Sahay, A, Borner, M, Lahmer, A 1999Computer-integrated revision total hip replacement surgery: concept and preliminary results.Med Image Anal3301319
Metadata
Title
A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures
Authors
M. A. Talamini
S. Chapman
S. Horgan
W. S. Melvin
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2003
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2003

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2003 Go to the issue