Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2003

01-08-2003 | Original article

The influence of periarterial papaverine application on intraoperative renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in a pig model

Authors: J. Zacherl, E. Thein, M. Stangl, H. Feussner, S. Bock, M. Mittlböck, W. Erhardt, J. R. Siewert

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The transplantation of live donor kidneys harvested laparoscopically is associated with a higher incidence of delayed graft function than the transplantation of grafts harvested via the open technique. The delay is believed to be due to a decrease in renal blood flow during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether renal function and blood perfusion can be enhanced by the periarterial application of papaverine during LDN. Methods: Renal function and blood flow were studied in a porcine model that included a total of 24 pigs (20–30 kg). In 12 of the pigs, urine output and creatinine clearance were determined as measures of renal function. In the other 12 pigs, renal blood flow was determined using fluorescent-labeled microspheres. In each group, the pigs were randomized into two subgroups, one with and one without a perivascular injection of 50 mg papaverine. Results: As compared to the controls, the animals receiving papaverine had a significantly higher urine output (3.1 ± 1.6 vs 0.9 ± 0.45 ml/h/kg; p = 0.02), superior creatinine clearance (2.22 ± 0.5 vs 0.95 ± 0.1 ml/min/kg; p = 0.038), and enhanced renal blood flow (4.9 ± 2.2 vs 2.1 ± 0.8 ml/min/g; p = 0.008). Conclusions: When applied to the tissue surrounding the renal artery, papaverine substantially improves renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic live kidney donation. Whether graft optimization during kidney procurement also translates into improved posttransplantation function remains to be established.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ali, AT, Montgomery, WD, Santamore, WP, Spence, PA 1997Preventing gastroepiploic artery spasm: papaverine vs. calcium channel blockade.J Surg Res714148CrossRefPubMed Ali, AT, Montgomery, WD, Santamore, WP, Spence, PA 1997Preventing gastroepiploic artery spasm: papaverine vs. calcium channel blockade.J Surg Res714148CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Arquilla, B, Gupta, R, Gernshiemer, J, Fischer, M 2000Acute arterial spasm in an extremity caused by inadvertent intra-arterial injection successfully treated in the emergency department.J Emerg Med19139143CrossRefPubMed Arquilla, B, Gupta, R, Gernshiemer, J, Fischer, M 2000Acute arterial spasm in an extremity caused by inadvertent intra-arterial injection successfully treated in the emergency department.J Emerg Med19139143CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cisek, LJ, Gobet, RM, Peters, CA 1998Pneumoperitoneum produces reversible renal dysfuntion in animals with normal and chronically reduced renal function.J Endourol1295100PubMed Cisek, LJ, Gobet, RM, Peters, CA 1998Pneumoperitoneum produces reversible renal dysfuntion in animals with normal and chronically reduced renal function.J Endourol1295100PubMed
4.
go back to reference Finelli, FC, Gongora, E, Sasaki, TM, Light, JA 2001A survey: the prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers.Transplantation7118621864CrossRefPubMed Finelli, FC, Gongora, E, Sasaki, TM, Light, JA 2001A survey: the prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers.Transplantation7118621864CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Flowers, JF, Jacobs, S, Cho, E, Morton, A, Rosenberger, WF, Evans, D, Imbembo, AL, Bartlett, ST 1997Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg226483489PubMed Flowers, JF, Jacobs, S, Cho, E, Morton, A, Rosenberger, WF, Evans, D, Imbembo, AL, Bartlett, ST 1997Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg226483489PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hausmann, H, Photiadis, J, Hatzer, R 1996Blood flow in the internal mammary artery after the administration of papaverine during coronary artery bypass grafting.Tex Heart Inst J23279283PubMed Hausmann, H, Photiadis, J, Hatzer, R 1996Blood flow in the internal mammary artery after the administration of papaverine during coronary artery bypass grafting.Tex Heart Inst J23279283PubMed
7.
go back to reference Koffron, A, Herman, C, Gross, O, Ferrario, M, Kaufman, D, Abecassis, M, Fryer, J, Stuart, F, Leventhal, J 2001Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: analysis of donor and recipient outcomes.Transplant Proc331111CrossRefPubMed Koffron, A, Herman, C, Gross, O, Ferrario, M, Kaufman, D, Abecassis, M, Fryer, J, Stuart, F, Leventhal, J 2001Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: analysis of donor and recipient outcomes.Transplant Proc331111CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference London, ET, Ho, HS, Neruhaus, AMC, Wolfe, BM, Rudich, SM, Perez, RV 2000Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum.Ann Surg231195201CrossRefPubMed London, ET, Ho, HS, Neruhaus, AMC, Wolfe, BM, Rudich, SM, Perez, RV 2000Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum.Ann Surg231195201CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McDougall, EM, Monk, TG, Wolf Jr, JS, Hicks, M, Clayman, RV, Gardner, S, Humphrey, PA, Sharp, T, Martin, K 1996The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model.J Am Coll Surg182317328PubMed McDougall, EM, Monk, TG, Wolf Jr, JS, Hicks, M, Clayman, RV, Gardner, S, Humphrey, PA, Sharp, T, Martin, K 1996The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model.J Am Coll Surg182317328PubMed
10.
go back to reference Miki, Y, Iwase, K, Kamiike, W, Taniguchi, E, Sakaguchi, K, Sumimura, J, Matsuda, H, Nagai, I 1997Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and time-course changes in renal function: the effect of the retraction method on renal function.Surg Endosc11838841CrossRefPubMed Miki, Y, Iwase, K, Kamiike, W, Taniguchi, E, Sakaguchi, K, Sumimura, J, Matsuda, H, Nagai, I 1997Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and time-course changes in renal function: the effect of the retraction method on renal function.Surg Endosc11838841CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Montgomery, RA, Kavoussi, LR, Su, LM, Sinkov, V, Cohen, C, Maley, WR, Burdick, JF, Markowitz, J, Ratner, LE 2001Improved recipient results after 5 years of performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Transplant Proc3311081110CrossRefPubMed Montgomery, RA, Kavoussi, LR, Su, LM, Sinkov, V, Cohen, C, Maley, WR, Burdick, JF, Markowitz, J, Ratner, LE 2001Improved recipient results after 5 years of performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Transplant Proc3311081110CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nogueira, JM, Cangro, CB, Fink, JC, Schweitzer, E, Wiland, A, Klassen, DK, Gardner, J, Flowers, J, Jacobs, S, Cho, E, et al. 1999A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation67722728CrossRefPubMed Nogueira, JM, Cangro, CB, Fink, JC, Schweitzer, E, Wiland, A, Klassen, DK, Gardner, J, Flowers, J, Jacobs, S, Cho, E,  et al. 1999A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation67722728CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ostraat, O, Lonnroth, H, Olausson, M, Blohme, I 2000Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a European transplant centre.Transpl Int13S253S254 Ostraat, O, Lonnroth, H, Olausson, M, Blohme, I 2000Experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a European transplant centre.Transpl Int13S253S254
14.
go back to reference Philosophe, B, Kuo, PC, Schweitzer, EJ, Farney, AC, Lim, JW, Johnson, LB, Jacobs, S, Flowers, JL, Cho, ES, Bartlett, ST 1999Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy.Transplantation68497502PubMed Philosophe, B, Kuo, PC, Schweitzer, EJ, Farney, AC, Lim, JW, Johnson, LB, Jacobs, S, Flowers, JL, Cho, ES, Bartlett, ST 1999Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy.Transplantation68497502PubMed
15.
go back to reference Raab, S, Thein, E, Harris, AG, Messmer, K 1999A new sample processing unit for the fluorescent microsphere method.Am J Physiol276H1806H1807 Raab, S, Thein, E, Harris, AG, Messmer, K 1999A new sample processing unit for the fluorescent microsphere method.Am J Physiol276H1806H1807
16.
go back to reference Ratner, LE, Ciseck, LJ, Moore, RG, Cigarroa, FG, Kaufman, HS, Kavoussi, LR 1995Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation6010471049PubMed Ratner, LE, Ciseck, LJ, Moore, RG, Cigarroa, FG, Kaufman, HS, Kavoussi, LR 1995Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation6010471049PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ratner, LE, Kavoussi, LR, Sroka, M, Hiller, J, Weber, R, Schulam, PG, Montgomery, R 1997Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach.Transplantation63229233PubMed Ratner, LE, Kavoussi, LR, Sroka, M, Hiller, J, Weber, R, Schulam, PG, Montgomery, R 1997Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach.Transplantation63229233PubMed
18.
go back to reference Razvi, HA, Fields, D, Vargas, JC, Vaughan, ED, Vukasin, A, Sosa, RE 1996Oliguria during laparoscopic surgery: evidence for direct renal parenchymal compression as an etiologic factor.J Endourol1014PubMed Razvi, HA, Fields, D, Vargas, JC, Vaughan, ED, Vukasin, A, Sosa, RE 1996Oliguria during laparoscopic surgery: evidence for direct renal parenchymal compression as an etiologic factor.J Endourol1014PubMed
19.
go back to reference Schweitzer, EJ, Wilson, J, Jacobs, S, Machan, CH, Philosophe, B, Farney, A, Colonna, J, Jarrell, BE, Bartlett, ST 2000Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg232392400CrossRefPubMed Schweitzer, EJ, Wilson, J, Jacobs, S, Machan, CH, Philosophe, B, Farney, A, Colonna, J, Jarrell, BE, Bartlett, ST 2000Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg232392400CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shafizadeh, S, McEvoy, JR, Murray, C, Baillie, GM, Ashcraft, E, Sill, T, Rogers, J, Baliga, P 2000Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.Am Surg6611321135PubMed Shafizadeh, S, McEvoy, JR, Murray, C, Baillie, GM, Ashcraft, E, Sill, T, Rogers, J, Baliga, P 2000Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.Am Surg6611321135PubMed
21.
go back to reference Thein, E, Raab, S, Harris, AG, Messmer, K 2000Automation of the use of fluorescent microspheres for the determination of blood flow.Comput Meth Prog Biol611121CrossRef Thein, E, Raab, S, Harris, AG, Messmer, K 2000Automation of the use of fluorescent microspheres for the determination of blood flow.Comput Meth Prog Biol611121CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vardiman, AB, Kopitnik, TA, Purdy, PD, Batjer, HH, Samson, DS 1995Treatment of traumatic arterial vasospasm with intraarterial papaverine infusion.Am J Neuroradiol16319321PubMed Vardiman, AB, Kopitnik, TA, Purdy, PD, Batjer, HH, Samson, DS 1995Treatment of traumatic arterial vasospasm with intraarterial papaverine infusion.Am J Neuroradiol16319321PubMed
23.
go back to reference Wolf, JS Jr, Merion, RM, Leichtman, AB, Campbell Jr, DA, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Turcotte, JG, Konnak, JW 2001Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation72284290PubMed Wolf, JS Jr, Merion, RM, Leichtman, AB, Campbell Jr, DA, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Turcotte, JG, Konnak, JW 2001Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation72284290PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yang, SC, Park, DS, Lee, DH, Lee, JM, Park, K 1995Retroperitoneal endoscopic live donor nephrectomy: report of 3 cases.J Urol 15318841886CrossRefPubMed Yang, SC, Park, DS, Lee, DH, Lee, JM, Park, K 1995Retroperitoneal endoscopic live donor nephrectomy: report of 3 cases.J Urol 15318841886CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The influence of periarterial papaverine application on intraoperative renal function and blood flow during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in a pig model
Authors
J. Zacherl
E. Thein
M. Stangl
H. Feussner
S. Bock
M. Mittlböck
W. Erhardt
J. R. Siewert
Publication date
01-08-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2003
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8835-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2003

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2003 Go to the issue