Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 04-05-2024 | Dysphagia | Original Article

A Tool for the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency in Adults: Turkish Adaptation of Boston Residue and Clearance Scale

Authors: Samet Tosun, Saime Seyhun Topbaş, Elif Aksoy

Published in: Dysphagia

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to create a Turkish language adaptation of the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), a validated and reliable tool. The BRACS scale was first translated into Turkish and a Turkish version was subsequently developed. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) was administered to collect data from 25 dysphagic patients who were hospitalized after a stroke. The recorded films were subjected to editing procedures to ensure their appropriateness for the assessment of swallowing disorders and were then dispatched to a panel of five speech and language therapists for evaluation using the adaptation of the BRACS instrument. The scoring by the experts was evaluated using both explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity, item reliability, and construct (composite) reliability were measured by calculating the average variance extracted (AVE) values. For the 12 location items, EFA revealed 3 main latent factors: the laryngeal vestibule and the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The Turkish BRACS had excellent inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff’s alpha coefficient values ranged from 0.93 to 0.95) and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from 0.88 to 0.93). Inter-rater ICCs for the first and second sessions were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. CFA showed that all fitted criteria reached acceptable or perfect fit levels. The findings indicated that the proposed factor structure was validated. The AVE values are between 0.61 and 0.73 which was taken as evidence of convergent validity. The Turkish adaptation of the BRACS tool demonstrates both reliablity and validity, rendering it a useful and credible tool for assessing residual severity, particularly in clinical settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Logemann JA, Veis S, Colangelo L. A Screening Procedure for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. 1999;51:44–51. Logemann JA, Veis S, Colangelo L. A Screening Procedure for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. 1999;51:44–51.
5.
go back to reference Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kaneoka, A. S., Langmore, S. E., Krisciunas, G. P., Field, K., Scheel, R., McNally, E., Walsh, M. J., O'Dea, M. B., & Cabral, H. (2013). The Boston Residue and Clearance Scale: preliminary reliability and validity testing. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 65(6), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365006 Kaneoka, A. S., Langmore, S. E., Krisciunas, G. P., Field, K., Scheel, R., McNally, E., Walsh, M. J., O'Dea, M. B., & Cabral, H. (2013). The Boston Residue and Clearance Scale: preliminary reliability and validity testing. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 65(6), 312–317. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000365006
17.
go back to reference Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.
18.
go back to reference Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
19.
go back to reference Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi El kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, spss uygulamaları ve yorum. 9th ed. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları; 2009. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi El kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, spss uygulamaları ve yorum. 9th ed. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları; 2009.
20.
go back to reference Hair JF, Anderson RETR. Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Pearson Education; 1998. Hair JF, Anderson RETR. Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Pearson Education; 1998.
21.
go back to reference JC N. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. JC N. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
Metadata
Title
A Tool for the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency in Adults: Turkish Adaptation of Boston Residue and Clearance Scale
Authors
Samet Tosun
Saime Seyhun Topbaş
Elif Aksoy
Publication date
04-05-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10706-1