Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL

Authors: Eva-Maria Kraus, Natalie Rommel, Lisa H. Stoll, Andreas Oettinger, Adam P. Vogel, Matthis Synofzik

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The SWAL-QOL questionnaire is a common tool for evaluating patients’ dysphagia-specific quality of life. A validated German version is not available. This study aimed to establish a German version of the SWAL-QOL (G-SWAL-QOL) using a standardized translation procedure and to systematically evaluate its psychometric properties. The original SWAL-QOL was translated into German following international translation guidelines. A pilot study (45 subjects) confirmed comprehensibility of the G-SWAL-QOL. A consecutive series of 158 subjects (103 patients with dysphagia; 55 healthy controls) was then recruited to assess validity and reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL. Construct validity was analyzed through a correlation analysis with both (i) the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (ADI-D) and (ii) the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated to determine reliability. All questions of the G-SWAL-QOL were comprehensible, except one which was subsequently revised. Construct validity of the G-SWAL-QOL was demonstrated by moderate to high correlations with the ADI-D (Spearman’s rho 0.36 – 0.88). The G-SWAL-QOL was able to differentiate between patients with dysphagia and healthy controls (p < 0.001) and was sensitive to disease severity measured by different food textures. Reliability of the G-SWAL-QOL was good to excellent for both internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.7 for all domains, except eating desire [α = 0.69]) and test–retest reliability (Spearman’s rho ≥ 0.68 for all domains; ICC > 0.8 for all domains). The G-SWAL-QOL is a valid and reliable measuring tool for dysphagia-specific quality of life in German-speaking persons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malagelada J-R, Bazzoli F, Boeckxstaens G, De Looze D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, Lindberg G, Malfertheiner P, Salis G, Sharma P. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia—global guidelines and cascades update september 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370–8.CrossRefPubMed Malagelada J-R, Bazzoli F, Boeckxstaens G, De Looze D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, Lindberg G, Malfertheiner P, Salis G, Sharma P. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia—global guidelines and cascades update september 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.CrossRefPubMed Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Chignell KA, Logemann JA, Clarke C. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):115–21.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Chignell KA, Logemann JA, Clarke C. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):115–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Keage M, Delatycki M, Corben L, Vogel A. A systematic review of self-reported swallowing assessments in progressive neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):27–46.CrossRefPubMed Keage M, Delatycki M, Corben L, Vogel A. A systematic review of self-reported swallowing assessments in progressive neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):27–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroentérol Clin et Biol. 2009;33(3):167–71.CrossRef Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroentérol Clin et Biol. 2009;33(3):167–71.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen G, De Bodt M. The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL). Dysphagia. 2013;28(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMed Vanderwegen J, Van Nuffelen G, De Bodt M. The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL). Dysphagia. 2013;28(1):11–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):66–70.CrossRefPubMed Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):66–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26(2):117–24.CrossRefPubMed Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26(2):117–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):325–35.CrossRefPubMed Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27(3):325–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G, De Luca N, Farneti D, Marilia S, Calcagno P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):1–9.CrossRef Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G, De Luca N, Farneti D, Marilia S, Calcagno P. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):1–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stanschuss S. Rehabilitation von Dysphagien. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag GmbH; 2006. Stanschuss S. Rehabilitation von Dysphagien. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag GmbH; 2006.
14.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2012. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2012.
16.
go back to reference Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRefPubMed Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.CrossRefPubMed Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bauer F, Seiss M, Grässel E, Stelzle F, Klotz M, Rosanowski F. Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Hno. 2010;58(7):692–7.CrossRefPubMed Bauer F, Seiss M, Grässel E, Stelzle F, Klotz M, Rosanowski F. Swallowing-related quality of life in oral cavity cancer. The German version of the Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Hno. 2010;58(7):692–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instruments zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften. J Public Health. 1995;3(1):21–36.CrossRef Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey Übersetzung und psychometrische Testung eines krankheitsübergreifenden Instruments zur Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften. J Public Health. 1995;3(1):21–36.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Robbins J, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):122–33.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Robbins J, Kramer AE, Rosenbek JC, Chignell KA. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15(3):122–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand.(SF-36)-Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe, Göttingen. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand.(SF-36)-Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
23.
go back to reference Ellert U, Kurth B-M. Methodische Betrachtungen zu den Summenscores des SF-36 anhand der erwachsenen bundesdeutschen Bevölkerung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2004;47(11):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed Ellert U, Kurth B-M. Methodische Betrachtungen zu den Summenscores des SF-36 anhand der erwachsenen bundesdeutschen Bevölkerung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2004;47(11):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrance Eribaum Association; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrance Eribaum Association; 1988.
25.
go back to reference McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81(6):358.CrossRef Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81(6):358.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007. p. 646. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007. p. 646.
28.
go back to reference Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2014. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications; 2014.
29.
go back to reference Nunally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Nunally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
30.
go back to reference Portney L, Watkins M (1993) Foundations of clinical research. Applications and practice norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange. J Rehabil. 74(3). Portney L, Watkins M (1993) Foundations of clinical research. Applications and practice norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange. J Rehabil. 74(3).
31.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, van Reij EJ, Aaronson NK, Leemans CR. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(8):e67–71.CrossRefPubMed Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, van Reij EJ, Aaronson NK, Leemans CR. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(8):e67–71.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Starrost U. Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS). Schluckstörungen: Diagnostik und Rehabilitation, 3rd ed. München: Urban and Fischer; 2006. Starrost U. Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS). Schluckstörungen: Diagnostik und Rehabilitation, 3rd ed. München: Urban and Fischer; 2006.
Metadata
Title
Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL
Authors
Eva-Maria Kraus
Natalie Rommel
Lisa H. Stoll
Andreas Oettinger
Adam P. Vogel
Matthis Synofzik
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9872-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Dysphagia 4/2018 Go to the issue