Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 4/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Original Article

Quality of Life in Oncological Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Validity and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index

Authors: Renée Speyer, Bas J. Heijnen, Laura W. Baijens, Femke H. Vrijenhoef, Elsemieke F. Otters, Nel Roodenburg, Hans C. Bogaardt

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Quality of life is an important outcome measurement in objectifying the current health status or therapy effects in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. In this study, the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) have been determined for oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. At Maastricht University Medical Center, 76 consecutive patients were selected and asked to fill in three questionnaires on quality of life related to oropharyngeal dysphagia (the SWAL-QOL, the MDADI, and the DHI) as well as a simple one-item visual analog Dysphagia Severity Scale. None of the quality-of-life questionnaires showed any floor or ceiling effect. The test-retest reliability of the MDADI and the Dysphagia Severity Scale proved to be good. The test-retest reliability of the DHI could not be determined because of insufficient data, but the intraclass correlation coefficients were rather high. The internal consistency proved to be good. However, confirmatory factor analysis could not distinguish the underlying constructs as defined by the subscales per questionnaire. When assessing criterion validity, both the MDADI and the DHI showed satisfactory associations with the SWAL-QOL (reference or gold standard) after having removed the less relevant subscales of the SWAL-QOL. In conclusion, when assessing the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the DHI or the MDADI, not all psychometric properties have been adequately met. In general, because of difficulties in the interpretation of study results when using questionnaires lacking sufficient psychometric quality, it is recommended that researchers strive to use questionnaires with the most optimal psychometric properties.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sherman AC, Simonton S, Camp Adams D, Vural E, Owens B, Hanna E. Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:459–67.PubMed Sherman AC, Simonton S, Camp Adams D, Vural E, Owens B, Hanna E. Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:459–67.PubMed
2.
go back to reference García-Peris P, Parón L, Velasco C, de la Cuerda C, Camblor M, Bretón I, Herencia H, Verdaguer J, Navarro C, Clave P. Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr. 2007;26:710–7.PubMedCrossRef García-Peris P, Parón L, Velasco C, de la Cuerda C, Camblor M, Bretón I, Herencia H, Verdaguer J, Navarro C, Clave P. Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr. 2007;26:710–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Speyer R, Baijens LW, Heijnen MAM, Zwijnenberg I. The effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia by speech therapists: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):40–65.PubMedCrossRef Speyer R, Baijens LW, Heijnen MAM, Zwijnenberg I. The effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia by speech therapists: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):40–65.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, Rosenbek JC, Chignell K, Kramer AE, Bricker DE. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:870–6.PubMed Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:870–6.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Woisard V, Andrieux MP, Puech M. Validation of a self-assessment questionnaire for swallowing disorders (Deglutition Handicap Index). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2006;127(5):315–25. Woisard V, Andrieux MP, Puech M. Validation of a self-assessment questionnaire for swallowing disorders (Deglutition Handicap Index). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2006;127(5):315–25.
7.
go back to reference Crary MA, Carnaby Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.PubMedCrossRef Crary MA, Carnaby Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bogaardt HC, Speyer R, Baijens LW, Fokkens WJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-Qol. Dysphagia. 2009;24:66–70.PubMedCrossRef Bogaardt HC, Speyer R, Baijens LW, Fokkens WJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-Qol. Dysphagia. 2009;24:66–70.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
10.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
14.
go back to reference Aday LA. Designing and conducting health surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996. Aday LA. Designing and conducting health surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.
15.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development. Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. DeVellis RF. Scale development. Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001.
16.
go back to reference Last JM, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. Last JM, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
17.
go back to reference Everitt BS. Medical statistics from A to Z: a guide for clinicians and medical students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Everitt BS. Medical statistics from A to Z: a guide for clinicians and medical students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
18.
go back to reference Everitt BS. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Everitt BS. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Metadata
Title
Quality of Life in Oncological Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Validity and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index
Authors
Renée Speyer
Bas J. Heijnen
Laura W. Baijens
Femke H. Vrijenhoef
Elsemieke F. Otters
Nel Roodenburg
Hans C. Bogaardt
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9327-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Dysphagia 4/2011 Go to the issue