Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Short Communication

Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds

Authors: Ajay C Kevat, Anaath Kalirajah, Robert Roseby

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Our study aimed to objectively describe the audiological characteristics of wheeze and crackles in children by using digital stethoscope (DS) auscultation, as well as assess concordance between standard auscultation and two different DS devices in their ability to detect pathological breath sounds. Twenty children were auscultated by a paediatric consultant doctor and digitally recorded using the Littman™ 3200 Digital Electronic Stethoscope and a Clinicloud™ DS with smart device. Using spectrographic analysis, we found those with clinically described wheeze had prominent periodic waveform segments spanning expiration for a period of 0.03–1.2 s at frequencies of 100–1050 Hz, and occasionally spanning shorter inspiratory segments; paediatric crackles were brief discontinuous sounds with a distinguishing waveform. There was moderate concordance with respect to wheeze detection between digital and standard binaural stethoscopes, and 100% concordance for crackle detection. Importantly, DS devices were more sensitive than clinician auscultation in detecting wheeze in our study.
Conclusion: Objective definition of audio characteristics of abnormal paediatric breath sounds was achieved using DS technology. We demonstrated superiority of our DS method compared to traditional auscultation for detection of wheeze.
What is Known:
• The audiological characteristics of abnormal breath sounds have been well-described in adult populations but not in children.
• Inter-observer agreement for detection of pathological breath sounds using standard auscultation has been shown to be poor, but the clinical value of now easily available digital stethoscopes has not been sufficiently examined.
What is New:
• Digital stethoscopes can objectively define the nature of pathological breath sounds such as wheeze and crackles in children.
• Paediatric wheeze was better detected by digital stethoscopes than by standard auscultation performed by an expert paediatric clinician.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Holford SK (1981) Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds: measurement, classification and modeling (Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Holford SK (1981) Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds: measurement, classification and modeling (Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5.
go back to reference Kevat AC, Dawson J, Davis PG, Kamlin COF (2015) Evaluation of a digital stethoscope and smart device technology for assessment of heart rate in the newborn infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [Internet] 100(6):F562–F563. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-308639 CrossRef Kevat AC, Dawson J, Davis PG, Kamlin COF (2015) Evaluation of a digital stethoscope and smart device technology for assessment of heart rate in the newborn infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [Internet] 100(6):F562–F563. doi:10.​1136/​archdischild-2015-308639 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Moussavi ZK, Leopando MT, Rempel GR (1998) Automated detection of respiratory phases by acoustical means. Proc 20th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Vol20 Biomed Eng Towar Year 2000 Beyond (Cat No98CH36286). 20(1):21–4. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.1998.745812 Moussavi ZK, Leopando MT, Rempel GR (1998) Automated detection of respiratory phases by acoustical means. Proc 20th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Vol20 Biomed Eng Towar Year 2000 Beyond (Cat No98CH36286). 20(1):21–4. doi:10.​1109/​IEMBS.​1998.​745812
9.
go back to reference Prodhan P, Dela Rosa RS, Shubina M, Haver KE, Matthews BD, Buck S et al (2008) Wheeze detection in the pediatric intensive care unit: comparison among physician, nurses, respiratory therapists, and a computerized respiratory sound monitor. Respir Care 53(10):1304–1309PubMed Prodhan P, Dela Rosa RS, Shubina M, Haver KE, Matthews BD, Buck S et al (2008) Wheeze detection in the pediatric intensive care unit: comparison among physician, nurses, respiratory therapists, and a computerized respiratory sound monitor. Respir Care 53(10):1304–1309PubMed
10.
go back to reference Reichert S, Gass R, Brandt C, Andrès E (2008) Analysis of respiratory sounds: state of the art. Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med 2:45–58PubMedPubMedCentral Reichert S, Gass R, Brandt C, Andrès E (2008) Analysis of respiratory sounds: state of the art. Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med 2:45–58PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds
Authors
Ajay C Kevat
Anaath Kalirajah
Robert Roseby
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2929-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

European Journal of Pediatrics 7/2017 Go to the issue